Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhijith K. Sudhan vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 1115 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1115 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Abhijith K. Sudhan vs State Of Kerala on 3 February, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
                                                               2026:KER:9277

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

     TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 14TH MAGHA, 1947

                      BAIL APPL. NO. 186 OF 2026

     CRIME NO.2161/2025 OF THODUPUZHA POLICE STATION, IDUKKI


PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            ABHIJITH K. SUDHAN
            AGED 33 YEARS
            S/O SUDHAN, KUNNANANICKAL HOUSE, MULLARIKUDY KARA,
            KONNATHADY VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI
            DISTRICT., PIN - 685554


            BY ADV SHRI.N.A.SHAFEEK


RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031


            SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS   BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
03.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A. No.186 of 2026
                               -2-


                                                     2026:KER:9277



                             ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking

pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.2161/2025

of Thodupuzha Police Station, Idukki District. The offences

alleged are punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 64(2)(h), 69,

79 and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant

committed rape on the survivor on 20.08.2024 at her residence

and thereafter in an apartment at Riverview road against her

will and without her consent and thereby committed the above

offences.

4. I have heard Sri.N.A.Shafeek, the learned counsel for

the applicant and Sri.K.A.Nousahd, the learned Senior Public

Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials

2026:KER:9277

are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime;

hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public

Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged

incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal

acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the

course of the investigation.

6. I went through the FIS. A reading of the FIS would

show that the applicant and the survivor were in a relationship

since 2020. It is alleged that the applicant promised to marry

her. Thereafter on two occasions; first one at her house and the

second one at the resort, the applicant forcefully committed

rape on her. The alleged incidents were in the year 2024.

However, the FIS was lodged only on 18.12.2025. According to

the survivor, she came to know that the applicant was going to

marry another girl and it was thereafter the complaint was

lodged. The survivor initially filed a complaint before the Station

House Officer, Thodupuzha which is marked as Annexure-A.

The story in Annexure-A is a different one. In Annexure-A, she

stated that they were living as husband and wife together and

they had consensual sex twice and she became pregnant. It is

2026:KER:9277

also stated in the said complaint that she came to know that

the applicant was going to marry another girl and that was the

reason for filing the complaint. Thus, it appears that the alleged

sexual acts between the applicant and the survivor were

consensual in nature. Considering the allegations made against

the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary.

For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant

pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of

his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One

lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the

case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the

investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police

custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating

officer on 10.02.2026 and 11.02.2026 at 10 a.m. to undergo

2026:KER:9277

medical examination and potency test.

(iv) The applicant shall appear before the investigating

officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until

further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating

officer as and when required.

(v) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like

nature while on bail.

(vi) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the

prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or

in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence

any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vii) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala

without the permission of the trial Court.

(viii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of

bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating

the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE SKP

2026:KER:9277

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 186 OF 2026

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

Annexure A THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE DE FACTO COMPLAINANT WHICH IS OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT Annexure B THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT GIVEN BY THE DE FACTO COMPLAINANT Annexure C THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.01.2026 IN CRL.M.C. NO.864/2025 OF SESSIONS COURT THODUPUZHA

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter