Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Basith V vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 8782 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8782 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2025

Kerala High Court

Abdul Basith V vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
                                                                2025:KER:68631


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

  TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 / 25TH BHADRA, 1947

                     BAIL APPL. NO. 10861 OF 2025

       CRIME       NO.7/2024   OF    KALIKAVU       EXCISE      RANGE   OFFICE,

MALAPPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC NO.1193 OF 2024 OF

SPECIAL COURT (ATROCITIES AGAINST SC/ST), MANJERI.

PETITIONER:

            ABDUL BASITH V.,
            AGED 35 YEARS,
            S/O. ABDUL BASHEER V, VADAKOTH(H),
            UNNIKULAM P.O, THAMARASSERY THALUK,
            UNNIKULAM VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE (DIST),
            PIN - 673 574.

            BY ADVS.
            SRI.V.S.MANSOOR
            SRI.AKHIL BINOY
            SHRI.JIS JOHN SEBASTIAN
            SHRI.AHAMMED MIZWAR V.P.



RESPONDENT:

            STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
            PIN - 682 031.

            SRI.PRASANTH M P (PP)



     THIS   BAIL    APPLICATION     HAVING   COME    UP   FOR    ADMISSION   ON
16.09.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Bail Appl. No.10861 of 2025
                                                                  2025:KER:68631
                                          -2-

                         BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                    --------------------------------------
                    Bail Appl. No.10861 of 2025
                     ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 16th day of September, 2025

                                       ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No.7 of 2024 of

Kalikavu Excise Range Office, Malappuram, which is now pending as

S.C.No.1193 of 2024 of Special Court (Atrocities against SC/ST),

Manjeri, registered for the offences punishable under sections 22(c)

and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

(for short 'NDPS Act').

3. According to the prosecution on 06.03.2024, the accused

was found in possession while transporting 265.14 grams of

methamphetamine in a car bearing Reg. No.KL-57-W-1726 and thereby

committed the offences alleged. Petitioner was arrested on 22.07.2024,

and he has been in custody since then.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner has been in custody since 22.07.2024. It was submitted that

the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner or his

relatives at the time of his arrest.

2025:KER:68631

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application

and submitted that the grounds for arrest were communicated to the

petitioner at the time of his arrest. It was also submitted that since the

contraband seized from the petitioner was a commercial quantity, the

rigour under Section 37 of NDPS Act will apply and hence petitioner

ought not to be released on bail.

6. Though prima facie there are materials on record to

connect the petitioner with the crime, since petitioner has raised the

question of absence of communication of the grounds for his arrest, this

Court is obliged to consider the said issue.

7. In the decisions in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and

Others, [(2024) 7 SCC 576], Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of

Delhi) [(2024) 8 SCC 254] and Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana

[2025 SCC Online SC 269], it has been held that the requirement of

informing a person of grounds of arrest is a mandatory requirement of

Article 22(1) and also that the said information must be provided to the

arrested person in such a manner that sufficient knowledge of the basic

facts constituting the grounds must be communicated to the arrested

person effectively in the language which he understands.

8. In a recent decision in Shahina v. State of Kerala (2025

KHC Online 706), this Court has also considered the impact of the

aforesaid principles in relation to offences alleged under the NDPS Act

2025:KER:68631

and held that the grounds for arrest must be communicated.

9. On a perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that the

grounds for arrest have not been communicated to the petitioner as

contemplated by law. Though the arrest memo mentions that the

accused had arranged the contraband, there is no reference to the

nature of contraband or the quantity. Since those significant as far as

the offence under the NDPS Act is concerned, I am satisfied that the

grounds for arrest have not been communicated to the petitioner as

contemplated by law. Similarly, the arrest intimation also does not

refer to any grounds for arrest.

10. Petitioner has been in custody from 22.07.2024 onwards.

Since the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner

soon after the arrest, petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

2025:KER:68631

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any

modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the

jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider such applications if

any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law,

notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE ADS

2025:KER:68631

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 10861/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE EXCISE IN S.C NO: 1193/2024 BEFORE THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST ACT & NDPS CASES, MANJERI.

Annexure 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ARREST MEMO OF THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO. 7/2024 OF KALIKAVU EXCISE RANGE DATED 22/07/2024.

Annexure 3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ARREST INTIMATION ISSUED TO THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER.

Annexure 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN SLP(CRL) NO.

1149/2025 DATED 08/04/2025.

Annexure 5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN B.A NO.

8846/2025 DATED 28/07/2025.

Annexure 6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN B.A NO.

9456/2025 DATED 19/08/2025.

Annexure 7 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER IN B.A NO.

9940/2025 AND B.A NO. 9938/2025 DATED 20/08/2025.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter