Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reni vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 9609 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9609 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Reni vs State Of Kerala on 13 October, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
                                                       2025:KER:75635


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

   MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 21ST ASWINA, 1947

                    BAIL APPL. NO. 12183 OF 2025

         CRIME NO.10/2021 OF VANDIPERIYAR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,

IDUKKI   AGAINST   THE   ORDER/JUDGMENT   DATED   05.07.2023   IN   BAIL

APPL. NO.3885 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

PETITIONER:

           RENI.,
           AGED 36 YEARS,
           S/O. MANUEL, CHETTIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, VAZHAVARA,
           8TH MILE KARA, THANKAMANI VILLAGE,
           IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 515.


           BY ADVS.
           SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH
           SRI.LIBIN STANLEY
           SMT.SAIPOOJA
           SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL
           SMT.R.GAYATHRI
           SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA
           SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH
           SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE



RESPONDENTS:

    1      STATE OF KERALA.,
           REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
           PIN - 682 031.

    2      THE EXCISE INSPECTOR.,
           EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, VANDIPERIYAR,
           VANDIPERIYAR P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
           PIN - 685 533.
 Bail Appl. No.12183 of 2025
                                                 2025:KER:75635
                                 -2-

              SRI.PRASANTH M P (PP)



       THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Bail Appl. No.12183 of 2025
                                                        2025:KER:75635
                                       -3-

                    BECHU KURIAN THOMAS., J
                   -------------------------------------
                  Bail Appl. No.12183 of 2025
                    ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 13th day of October, 2025

                               ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.10 of 2021 of

Excise Range Office, Vandiperiyar, Idukki, which is now pending as

S.C.No.68 of 2021 on the files of Special Court for NDPS Act Cases,

Thodupuzha, registered for the offences punishable under sections

20(b)(ii)(C), 22(b), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

3. According to the prosecution on 26.02.2021, accused were

found in possession while transporting 20.970 Kg of dried ganja and

1.100 Kg of hashish oil in a car bearing Reg. No.KL-34-A8388 and

thereby committed the offences alleged. Petitioner was arrested on

26.02.2021, and he has been in custody since then.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner has been in custody since 26.02.2021. It was submitted that

the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner or his

relatives at the time of his arrest.

2025:KER:75635

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application

and submitted that the grounds for arrest were communicated to the

petitioner at the time of his arrest. It was also submitted that since the

contraband seized from the petitioner was a commercial quantity, the

rigour under Section 37 of NDPS Act will apply and hence petitioner

ought not to be released on bail.

6. Though prima facie there are materials on record to

connect the petitioner with the crime, since petitioner has raised the

question of absence of communication of the grounds for his arrest,

this Court is obliged to consider the said issue.

7. In the decisions in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and

Others, [(2024) 7 SCC 576], Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of

Delhi) [(2024) 8 SCC 254] and Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana

[2025 SCC Online SC 269], it has been held that the requirement of

informing a person of grounds of arrest is a mandatory requirement of

Article 22(1) and also that the said information must be provided to

the arrested person in such a manner that sufficient knowledge of the

basic facts constituting the grounds must be communicated to the

arrested person effectively in the language which he understands.

8. In a recent decision in Shahina v. State of Kerala (2025

KHC Online 706), this Court has also considered the impact of the

aforesaid principles in relation to offences alleged under the NDPS Act

2025:KER:75635

and held that the grounds for arrest must be communicated.

9. On a perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that the

grounds for arrest have not been communicated as contemplated by

law. In the arrest memo issued to the arrestee, there is no reference

to any of the grounds for arresting him, while in the arrest intimation,

the details have been specifically incorporated. However, since the

arrestee has not been communicated the grounds for arrest, the

mandate under Article 22 has not been satisfied. Accordingly,

petitioner's continuance in custody is illegal.

10. Petitioner has been in custody from 26.02.2021 onwards.

Since the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner

soon after the arrest, petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall personally be present on all posting dates before the trial Court and co-operate with the trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

2025:KER:75635

In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any

modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the

jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider such applications

if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law,

notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE ADS

2025:KER:75635

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 12183/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.09.2025 IN BA NO. 10082 OF 2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.09.2021 IN CRL.M.C. NO.110/2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR NDPS ACT CASES;

THODUPUZHA.

Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.10.2021 IN CRL.M.C. NO.141/2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR NDPS ACT CASES;

THODUPUZHA.

Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05.07.2023 IN BAIL APPL.NO.3885 OF 2023 ON HIGH COURT.

Annexure 5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.11.2023 IN BAIL APPL.NO.8883 OF 2021 ON HIGH COURT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter