Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shakeela vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 139 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 139 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2025

Kerala High Court

Shakeela vs State Of Kerala on 9 May, 2025

                                               2025:KER:33691




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

   FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 19TH VAISAKHA, 1947

                    CRL.MC NO. 3817 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.445/2023 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR

         AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC NO.708 OF 2023 OF

        JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KUNNAMKULAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 7:

    1      SHAKEELA
           AGED 45 YEARS, W/O. SAITHU MUHAMMED,
           CHELAKKAL HOUSE, PAVITTAPURAM DESOM, KOLLUR
           VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680302.

    2      SALIM
           AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. RASHEED,
           CHELAKKAL HOUSE, PAVITTAPURAM DESOM,
           KOLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
           PIN - 680302.

    3      SHAHUL HAMEED
           AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. SAITHU MUHAMMED,
           ASARIVALAPPIL HOUSE, AKKIKAVU DESOM,
           PERUMBILAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
           PIN - 680519.

    4      SAJNA
           AGED 36 YEARS, D/O. RASHEED,
           CHELAKKAL HOUSE, PAVITTAPURAM DESOM,
                                               2025:KER:33691
Crl.M.C.No.3817 of 2025
                            :2:


         KOLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680302.

    5    SALEENA
         AGED 39 YEARS, D/O. RASHEED,
         CHELAKKAL HOUSE, PAVITTAPURAM DESOM,
         KOLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680302.

    6    RASHEED
         AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED,
         CHELAKKAL HOUSE, PAVITTAPURAM DESOM,
         KOLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680302.

    7    ASHIQ
         AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. KUNJUMON,
         YAARTHINKAL HOUSE, VALANCE ROAD,
         KANNIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680027.


         BY ADV VISHNUPRASAD NAIR


RESPONDENT(S)/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & INJURED:


    1    STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHIN,
         PIN - 682031.

    2    NUSAIBA
         AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. SAITHU MUHAMMED,
         ASHARIVALAPPIL HOUSE, AKKIKAVU PO,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT -, PIN - 680519.
                                               2025:KER:33691
Crl.M.C.No.3817 of 2025
                            :3:


    3    SAITHU MUHAMMED
         AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. ALI,
         ASHARIVALAPPIL HOUSE, AKKIKAVU PO,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT -, PIN - 680519.

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN
         SRI. M C ASHI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 09.05.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                  2025:KER:33691
Crl.M.C.No.3817 of 2025
                               :4:



                           ORDER

Dated this the 9th day of May, 2025

The petitioners have approached this Court to quash

Annexures - 1 and 2 and all further proceedings in Crime

No.445 of 2003 of Kunnamkulam Police Station on the ground

of settlement arrived at between the parties.

2. The petitioners are the accused and the

offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under

Sections 450, 341, 323, 354, 384, 294(b), 506, 509 and 34 IPC.

Respondents 2 and 3 are the defacto complainants. Annexures

3 and 4 are the affidavit sworn in by them.

3. Heard Sri. Vishnuprasad Nair, the learned

Counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri. K.R.Arun Krishnan,

the learned Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 and the

learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent.

2025:KER:33691

4. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the matter has been settled and genuineness of

the settlement has been ascertained. A statement has been

obtained from respondents 2 and 3 and they confirm the fact

that the settlement has indeed been arrived at in terms of

Annexures 3 and 4 affidavits filed by them respectively.

5. Learned Counsel submits that the defacto

complainant as well as the injured have settled the dispute as

revealed in Annexures 3 and 4 affidavits.

6. In view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10

SCC 303] and State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan

[(2019) 5 SCC 688], I am of the opinion that the proceedings

against the petitioners can be quashed taking note of the

settlement arrived at between the victim and the offender. No

purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings 2025:KER:33691

against the petitioners.

Crl.M.C. is allowed and Annexure-1 FIR and Annexure-

2 Final Report are quashed. No further proceedings in

C.C.No.708 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class

Magistate Court, Kunnamkulam, arising of Crime No.445 of

2003 of Kummankulam Police Station as against the petitioners

are warranted.

Sd/-

SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE ams 2025:KER:33691

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS DATED 8/4/2023 IN CRIME NO. 445/2023 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION

Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C. NO. 708/2023 ON THE FILES OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KUNNAMKULAM

Annexure 3 AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21/3/2025

Annexure 4 AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21/3/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter