Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaba K. Jabaz vs Ghalib Moideen
2025 Latest Caselaw 5526 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5526 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2025

Kerala High Court

Shaba K. Jabaz vs Ghalib Moideen on 26 March, 2025

Author: Devan Ramachandran
Bench: Devan Ramachandran
                                                       2025:KER:26779


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
                                   &
        THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA
 WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947
                      OP (FC) NO. 153 OF 2025
 AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.17/2024 AND I.A.19/2024 IN
    OP NO.1858 OF 2022 DATED 20.12.2024 OF FAMILY COURT,
                              ERNAKULAM

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

         SHABA K. JABAZ, AGED 32 YEARS
         DAUGHTER OF LATE K.M.JABAZ RESIDING
         AT 48/425B, KIZHAKKEVELY, EDAPPALLY
         RAGHAVAN PILLAI ROAD, ELAMAKKARA,
         ERANKULAM, PIN - 682026

         BY ADV PEEYUS A.KOTTAM


RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

         GHALIB MOIDEEN, AGED 34 YEARS
         SON OF M.A.MOIDEEN, RESIDING AT 39/357,
         MADATHIL, MADATHIPARAMBU ROAD, VENNALA
         P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682028

         BY ADVS.
         M.H.ASIF ALI
         S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF(K/000647/1990)
         ARAVIND T RAMESH(K/000993/2016)
         RAJANA JOSE(K/1696/2022)
         ASHIK ALI M.H.(K/2354/2021)


     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.03.2025,     THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                   2025:KER:26779
OP(FC) 153/25
                                2

                          JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The petitioner, who is the mother of an 8 year old child,

has approached this Court impugning Ext.P5 order of the learned

Family Court, Ernakulam, dismissing I.A.No.17/2024 filed by her,

seeking modification of an earlier order in I.A.No.4025/2022 in

O.P.No.1858/2022.

2. The first order of the learned Family Court, namely

that in I.A.No.4025/2022, has been produced as Ext.P1, in which,

the respondent-father of the child has been allowed to have his

interim custody every second Saturday from 10.30 A.M., till 4

P.M. on the ensuing Sunday; and from 10.30 A.M., till 4 P.M. on

third Saturdays. The place of exchange has been shown, in the

said order, to be the premises of the Court.

3. On the imputation that the child is unwilling to go to

the father for overnight stay, the petitioner filed I.A.No.17/2024

seeking modification of the earlier mentioned order, but which 2025:KER:26779 OP(FC) 153/25

has now been dismissed by the learned Family Court. This order,

producing it as Ext.P5, has been assailed by the petitioner on

various grounds.

4. Before we move forward, we must record that, on

24.03.2025, when this matter was earlier considered by us, both

sides offered to be present along with the child today.

5. The parties were so present and we interacted with the

child rather extensively.

6. We must say that the child exhibited no ill-will or lack

of affection towards his father and recounted certain instances in

the past where he spent time with him. We did not see any

objection from him to be in the company of his father, though he

seemed to be under pressure on account of the circumstances in

which his parents are fighting with each other for his custody.

7. We thereupon had an interaction with the parents and

the petitioner-mother reiterated that she is not against the

arrangement in Ext.P1 order; but that she is only concerned that 2025:KER:26779 OP(FC) 153/25

her son cannot be forced for an overnight stay with his father if

he is not willing to do so.

8. As we have said above, the child did not express any

reservation even before us to be with his father overnight on

Saturdays as allowed in Ext.P1; and are, therefore, of the view

that what the mother has expressed before us is an apprehension

that she may have obtained on account of the strife she is going

through with her now divorced husband.

9. That said, however, we are unhappy that the place of

exchange of the child for the purpose of Ext.P1 should be the

Court premises, because it is our experience that children abhor

going to such and in being paraded in front of lawyers and other

litigants. We, therefore, put it to the parties whether they can

suggest any other place and both of them agreed that the venue

of exchange of the child hereinafter can be in front of the

'Changampuzha Park', Edappally, Eranakulam.

In the afore circumstances, we dispose of this Original 2025:KER:26779 OP(FC) 153/25

Petition, confirming Ext.P1; however, modifying it to the limited

extent that the place of exchange of the child, for the purpose of

the arrangement therein, shall be in front of the gate of the

'Chamgampuzha Park' on the National Highway at Edappally.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE RR 2025:KER:26779 OP(FC) 153/25

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 153/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. NO.

4025/2022 IN O.P.NO. 1858/2022 DATED 15.10.2022

Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. 17/2024 IN I.A.NO. 4025/2022 IN O.P.NO. 1858/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING MODIFICATION OF EXT-P1 ORDER BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 06.11.2024

Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO EXT-P2 APPLICATION BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 30.11.2024

Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO I.A. NO. 14/2024 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 03.08.2024

Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION IN I.A.NO. 21/2025 IN O.P 1858/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 10.03.2025

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NO.1858/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 01.07.2022

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO CHRISTMAS CUSTODY PETITION 2024 IN I.A.NO. 19/2024 IN O.P.NO.1858/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 04.12.2024

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO ONAM CUSTODY PETITION IN I.A.NO. 14/2024 IN O.P.NO.1858/2022 2025:KER:26779 OP(FC) 153/25

FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 17.08.2024

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILE BY THE PETITIONER IN I.A. 19/2024 IN O.P. 1858/2022 DATED 10.11.2024

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE MINOR SON IN I.A.NO. 4025/2022 IN O.P.NO.1858/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 01.07.2022

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1(a) A True Copy of order dated 17/11/2022 in CMP No. 713/2022 on the files of the Honourable Additional District and Sessions Court (for the Trial of Cases Relating to Atrocities and Sexual Violence against Women and Children), Ernakulam

Exhibit R1(b) A true copy of the order dated 07/12/2023 in B. A. No. 6010/2023 on the files of the Honourable High Court of Kerala

Exhibit R1(c) A true copy of the photograph taken at the residence of the Respondent on 16/03/2025 while the minor child was with the Respondent

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter