Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Samuel Mathew T vs Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 7045 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7045 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Samuel Mathew T vs Union Of India on 23 June, 2025

Author: N.Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
                                               2025:KER:44713

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

   MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1947

                    WP(C) NO. 10691 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

         SAMUEL MATHEW T.,
         AGED 64 YEARS,
         S/O T.M. SAMUEL,
         10 DEVI GARDENS,
         GURU NAGAR,
         MANNANTHALA P.Ο,
         TRIVANDRUM,
         PIN - 695015

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.PAUL P. ABRAHAM
         SRI.ANANDHA KRISHNAN R.
         SRI.MANOJKUMAR C.M.


RESPONDENTS:

    1    UNION OF INDIA,
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
         MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
         DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS,
         NORTH BLOCK,
         NEW DELHI,
         PIN - 110001

    2    CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL,
         KERALA CIRCLE,
         DEPARTMENT OF POSTS-INDIA,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         KERALA,
         PIN - 695001.
                                               2025:KER:44713
W.P.(C) No.10691/2025
                             :2:

    3      SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES,
           DEPARTMENT OF POSTS-INDIA,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
           NORTH DIVISION,
           KERALA,
           PIN - 695001.

           BY ADV.
           SRI.K.R.RAJKUMAR, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.06.2025, THE COURT ON 23.06.2025 DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                     2025:KER:44713
W.P.(C) No.10691/2025
                                          :3:




                               N. NAGARESH, J.

           `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                       W.P.(C) No.10691 of 2025

              `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                    Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2025


                                JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

The petitioner along with his wife purchased two Kisan

Vikas Patra Certificates on 02.05.2016. The Certificates are to

mature on 02.07.2025. The petitioner and his wife intended to

transfer the two Certificates in favour of his wife and his mother.

The petitioner therefore submitted Ext.P2 application for

transfer on 15.01.2024, to the 3rd respondent.

2. The petitioner was informed as per Ext.P3 that

the transfer cannot be permitted under the prevailing Kisan

Vikas Patra Scheme, 2019. The petitioner states that he had

purchased the Kisan Vikas Patra when Kisan Vikas Patra

Rules, 2014 were in force. The Kisan Vikas Patra Scheme, 2025:KER:44713

2019 does not permit transfer of certificates issued under the

Scheme to third parties. The refusal to allow the transfer on

that ground is therefore arbitrary and unlawful, contends the

petitioner.

3. The Notification rescinding the Kisan Vikas

Patra Rules, 2014 explicitly provides that such rescission shall

not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired or

accrued under the previous Rules, contends the petitioner. The

respondents have failed to consider the binding nature of the

2014 Rules at the time of the petitioner's investment. The

respondents are therefore compellable to approve the transfer

of Kisan Vikas Patra Certificates in favour of the petitioner's

wife and mother, urged the counsel for the petitioner.

4. The Senior Panel Counsel resisted the writ

petition. A statement has been filed on behalf of the

respondents.

5. The 2019 KVP Rules were further amended in

2020 and the 2020 amendments govern the transfer request 2025:KER:44713

made after their enactment. In the case of the petitioner, the

transfer request was made only on 15.01.2024 when 2019 KVP

Rules came into effect. Under the 2019 Rules, all transfers are

barred, except in death cases. The writ petition is therefore

liable to be dismissed.

6. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for

the respondents.

7. The petitioner and his wife jointly purchased

two Kisan Vikas Patras on 02.05.2016. At the time of the

purchase, the Kisan Vikas Patras were governed by Ext.P1

Kisan Vikas Patra Rules, 2014 framed in exercise of the powers

conferred by Section 12 of the Government Savings Certificates

Act, 1959. A perusal of Ext.P1 Rules would show that there is

no express prohibition for transferring the Kisan Vikas Patras

under Ext.P1 Rules. On the other hand, Rule 10 of the KVP

Rules, 2014 enabled the holders of KVP to transfer the same

from one person to another with the consent in writing of an 2025:KER:44713

officer of the Post Office or Bank as specified in the Table

provided under Rule 10.

8. The Government of India framed Ext.P4 Kisan

Vikas Patra Scheme, 2019 which was notified on 12.12.2019.

Paragraph 7(2) of Ext.P4 Scheme gives a limited facility for

transfer of the Kisan Vikas Patra account. The Scheme does

not provide for transfer of Kisan Vikas Patra from one

individual to another individual. The contention of the

respondents is that in view of the KVP Scheme, 2019, the

request for transfer of the two Kisan Vikas Patra Certificates

made by the petitioner cannot be considered.

9. The petitioner had purchased the Kisan Vikas

Patra along with his wife on 02.05.2016 when Ext.P1 Rules,

2014 were in force. The petitioner, under the Rules, 2014,

could have transferred the Certificates with the consent of the

designated officers as provided under Rule 10. Rule 10 gives a

vested right to the petitioner to transfer Kisan Vikas Patras.

The subsequent Scheme, 2019 framed as per Ext.P4 cannot 2025:KER:44713

take away the right of the petitioner to transfer the Kisan Vikas

Patras, since a right vested in a citizen cannot be taken away

retrospectively.

In the circumstances, the petitioner is entitled

to succeed. The writ petition is allowed. The respondents are

directed to approve the transfer of the Kisan Vikas Patra

Certificates jointly held by the petitioner along with his wife in

favour of the petitioner's wife and mother.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/19.06.2025 2025:KER:44713

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10691/2025

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE KISAN VIKAS PATRA RULES, 2014 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORMAL APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER DATED 15.01.2024 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED NIL Exhibit P3(a) A LEGIBLE TYPED COPY OF THE EXHIBIT P3 COMMUNICATION Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF KISAN VIKAS PATRA SCHEME, 2019 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF RESCIND NOTIFICATION OF PREVIOUS NATIONAL SAVING SCHEME RULES (NOTIFIED VIDE GSR NO. 912 & 913(E)) DATED 12/12/2019 Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter