Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Keerthana.S.Kumar vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 906 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 906 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Kerala High Court

Keerthana.S.Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 11 July, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

                                1



                                                2025:KER:51268

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

    FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1947

                 BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

   CRIME NO.1511/2024 OF Angamali Police Station, Ernakulam

        AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2025 IN CMP NO.1176 OF

   2025 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ANGAMALY

  ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 28.06.2025 IN CRMC

   NO.1795 OF 2025 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)-II,

                            ERNAKULAM

PETITIONER/ 2ND ACCUSED :

          KEERTHANA.S.KUMAR
          AGED 30 YEARS
          D/O SATHEESH KUMAR,
          NEDUMTHURLLTHIL ROAD, P
          ANANGAD.P.O,
          NOW RESIDING AT C/O SANTHAKUMARI,
          MANKOOTTATHIL (H), UDAYAMPERUR,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 307


          BY ADV SMT.G.VIDYA


RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT :

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

                                 2



                                                 2025:KER:51268

    *     ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED

    2     VEENA VARGHESE
          W/O BASIL JAMES, KOKKARAVELIL HOUSE,
          VADAYAMPADY P.O., AIKARANAD SOUTH,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
    *     ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 10-7-25 IN
          CRL MA 1/25


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.K.SHAJ
          SMT.BEENA N.KARTHA
          SRI.ARUN CHAND
          SHRI.BHARAT VIJAY P.
          SMT.MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON
          SMT.ARCHANA P.P.
          SMT.GOPIKA GOPAL
          SMT.SHEHROON PATEL A.K.
          SHRI.ISSAC MELVIN B.O.

          SRI.PRASANTH M.P., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR



     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.07.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

                                        3



                                                                 2025:KER:51268




                          BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                       -------------------------------------
                              B.A.No.8342 of 2025
                        ------------------------------------
                       Dated this the 11th day of July, 2025

                                     ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.1511 of 2024 of

Angamaly Police Station, Ernakulam, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 406, 419 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had impersonated

as an officer of NORKA in Delhi and induced the defacto complainant to

pay an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- for a job Visa for the defacto

complainant in Canada and thereafter failed to provide such a Visa or

return the amount and thereby the accused committed the offences

alleged. Petitioner has earlier approached this Court for anticipatory bail

and the same was granted on 10.12.2024. Petitioner was arrested on BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

2025:KER:51268

11.06.2025 for violation of conditions of bail granted on that day.

4. Petitioner along with the first accused approached this Court

in B.A.No.6706 of 2024 and by an order dated 10.12.2024, this Court

granted anticipatory bail on conditions. One of the conditions stipulated

that 'the petitioners shall pay the amount as agreed in Annexure A1

within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order'.

Since the amount as stipulated in the order granting anticipatory bail as

per Annexure A1 agreement produced therein, was not paid, the defacto

complainant filed an application for cancellation of bail as C.M.P.No.410 of

2025. By an order dated 19.05.2025, the learned Magistrate cancelled

the bail of the petitioner as well as that of the first accused. It was

specifically noted in the order cancelling the bail that the condition

imposed by the High Court while granting anticipatory bail to pay the

amount as per Annexure A1 was violated. Petitioner did not challenge the

order of cancellation of bail and in the meantime, she was arrested on

11.06.2025. Thereafter petitioner has approached this Court seeking

regular bail.

5. Heard Smt.G.Vidya, the learned counsel for the petitioner,

Sri.K.Shaj, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant as well as

Sri.Prasanth M.P., the learned Public Prosecutor. BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

2025:KER:51268

6. The learned counsel for the defacto complainant vehemently

objected to the grant of bail and submitted that the petitioner has in

gross violation of the conditions imposed by this Court without any

deference to the orders of this Court refused to pay the amount and

hence, she shall not be released on bail.

7. On a perusal of the order of this Court in B.A.No.6706 of

2024, it is noticed that condition No.6 related to payment of amounts as

agreed in Annexure A1, which was produced in that bail application.

Annexure A1 was an agreement executed between M/s. Rights Associates

through its Proprietor Mr.Prathapan and the defacto complainant.

Petitioner was not a party to that agreement. Since this Court had only

directed the amounts to be paid by the petitioners as agreed in Annexure

A1, the liability to pay the amount as per the said condition can fall only

on the parties to the agreement which is the first accused. The violation

of the said condition could not have been attributed to the petitioner.

However, since the order of cancellation of bail has not been challenged

by the petitioner, I cannot enter into a conclusion in that regard. But,

bearing in mind the aforesaid, I am of the view that petitioner ought to be

released on bail.

BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

2025:KER:51268

8. Accordingly this bail application is allowed on the following

conditions :-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) without sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM BAIL APPL. NO. 8342 OF 2025

2025:KER:51268

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8342/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure -A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE, ANGAMALY IN CMP NO.1176/2025 DATED 16.06.2025 Annexure-A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ADDL. SESSIONS COURT-LL, EMAKULAM DIVISION IN CRIMINAL M.C.NO.1795./2025 DATED 28.06.2025 ANNEXURE R2A The true copy of Judgment dated 10/12/2024 in B.A. No. 6706/2024 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala ANNEXURE R2B The true copy of Order dated 19/05/2025 in CMP No. 410/2025 in Crime No. 1511/2024 of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Angamaly

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter