Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jolly Kv vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 889 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 889 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Kerala High Court

Jolly Kv vs State Of Kerala on 11 July, 2025

                                                            2025:KER:51429
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

         FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1947

                           WP(C) NO. 13585 OF 2021


PETITIONER:

              JOLLY KV.,
              AGED 68 YEARS
              S/O. VARKEY, RESIDING AT KANJIRAKKATT HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM
              P.. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 691.

              BY ADVS.
              SHRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J.
              SRI.VARUGHESE M EASO


RESPONDENTS:

     1        STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
              DEPARTMENT AND FARMER'S WELFARE, SECRETARIAT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

     2        BANK OF INDIA,
              KURUPPAMPADY BRANCH, DR.K.C. MATHEW MEMORIAL BUILDING, ALUVA
              MUNNAR ROAD SH 16, KURUPPAMAPDY, KERALA 683 545.

     3        THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
              KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 691.

              BY ADVS.
              GOVERNMENT PLEADER
              SRI.K.M.ANEESH
              SRI.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR (KALIYANAM)
              SRI.ADARSH KUMAR
              SRI.BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM
              SRI.DILEEP CHANDRAN
              SRI.SHASHANK DEVAN
              GP- NIMA JACOB


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.07.2025,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No. 13585 of 2021              -2-




                                                           2025:KER:51429


                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of July, 2025

Petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of an order

quashing Exts.P1 and P3. Petitioner has also sought for a direction to

the 2nd respondent to provide a complete statement of accounts of

the petitioner for A/c No.857377710000073. Petitioner has further

sought for a direction to the 3rd respondent to hear the petitioner

and consider Ext.P4 objection before further proceedings are

initiated.

2. Petitioner was granted loan to the tune of Rs.3,74,000/- in

the year 2013 for constructing a 'polyhouse' farming system under

the technical guidance of the Agricultural Department and

Horticulture Mission. As per the scheme 75% is the subsidy amount

to be given by the Government and the remaining is to be repaid by

the agriculturalist. Therefore, it is the contention of the petitioner

that as per the scheme Rs.2,80,500/- is the contribution by the

Government towards subsidy and the remaining amount due by the

petitioner is Rs.94,500/- which is to be paid in instalments. While so,

Ext.P1 communication was issued stating that the loan to the tune of

Rs.3,74,000/- has been declared as NPA due to default and

demanded to repay the loan. Immediately petitioner approached the

Bank and he was intimated that the balance amount outstanding as

2025:KER:51429

on date is Rs.1,04,000/-. While so, Ext.P2 letter was issued by the

petitioner to the 2nd respondent requesting clarification on the

demand of Rs.1,04,000/- and requested to issue an account

statement. But the 2nd respondent has not issued any statement to

the petitioner. While so, petitioner received Ext.P3 revenue recovery

demand notice demanding an amount of Rs.1,14,397/- with interest

at 10.65% from 31.10.2019, to which, the petitioner submitted

Ext.P4 objection before the 3rd respondent Deputy Tahsildar.

3. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the 2 nd

respondent Bank that the default is on the part of the petitioner in

repaying the amount and admitted that the amount of Rs.2,80,500/-

was received as subsidy from the Government, and that receipt of

the said subsidy is reflected in Ext.R2(a) statement of account of the

petitioner's loan. It is further stated that as on 16.06.2025 the

amount due from the petitioner is Rs.3,52,692.79/-.

4. A reply affidavit was filed by the petitioner, wherein

Ext.P8 communication issued by the Assistant Director, Agriculture

addressed the respondent Bank intimating that an amount of

Rs.2,80,500/- is forwarded to the Bank by way of cheque towards

subsidy amount for constructing 'polyhouse'. The contention raised

by the petitioner is that the Bank has received the subsidy amount

on 13.12.2013 but the same is seen credited only on 27.02.2019,

2025:KER:51429

and the interest has accrued on the whole loan amount due to the

default on the part of the Bank.

5. Thereupon, an additional affidavit dated 07.07.2025 was

filed denying the contention of the petitioner that interest has been

charged on the entire 3.74 lakhs from the year 2013 to 2019 inspite

of receipt of subsidy amount. It is further stated that no interest has

been charged for the said amount received as subsidy, and the

interest has been charged only on the remaining amount of loan

from the date on which the subsidy amount was received, and the

subsidy amount was kept separately and has been credited to the

loan account on 27.02.2019. A further affidavit is filed on

08.07.2025, wherein it is stated that in the earlier affidavit filed the

total outstanding as on 16.06.2025 was wrongly stated as

Rs.3,52,692.79/- and the actual amount due from the petitioner as

on 08.07.2025 is only Rs.1,80,558/- and same is only a bonafide

mistake. So in the affidavit filed by the Bank on 07.07.2025 it is

specifically stated that the interest amount has been claimed only

for the amount less the subsidy amount paid by the Government.

Petitioner would submit that the amount claimed as per the

statement is not correct and a proper statement of accounts

reflected the actual amount due may furnished to the petitioner.

2025:KER:51429

Therefore, I am of the view that the above writ petition could

be disposed of with the following directions:-

The respondent Bank shall intimate the petitioner regarding the

actual amount due as on date along with the statement of account.

If the petitioner is aggrieved by the amount shown in the reply given

by the Bank as directed above, it is for the petitioner to work out the

remedy in appropriate proceedings.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

sbk/-

2025:KER:51429

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13585/2021

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Exhibit R2(a) True copy of the account statement of the petitioner loan account PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P7 The letter dt. 07-10-13 issued by the 2nd respondent bank to the 1st respondent Exhibit P6 The true copy of agreement dt. 12-03-13 Exhibit P8 The true copy of letter No. K(2)80/13 dt.

                          13-12-13 issued by the 1st respondent to
                          the 2nd respondent
Exhibit P1                TRUE    COPY   OF    THE   DEMAND    LETTER
                          DT.06/11/2020    ISSUED    BY    THE    2ND
                          RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P5                TRUE COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT DT. 29/4/21 OF
                          EXT. P4
Exhibit P2                TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 05/12/2019 BY
                          THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3                TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY DEMAND
                          NOTICE DT. 13/04/2021 ISSUED BY THE 3RD
                          RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4                TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT. 29/4/21 BY

THE PETITIONER SENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter