Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Heera Rajan vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 627 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 627 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2025

Kerala High Court

Heera Rajan vs State Of Kerala on 4 July, 2025

Author: Devan Ramachandran
Bench: Devan Ramachandran
                                                      2025:KER:49254
WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

                                   1


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                   &

              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

        FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1947

                       WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

           HEERA RAJAN
           AGED 29 YEARS
           D/O RAJAN, THIRUTHIKAD HOUSE, PORKKULAM PO, THRISSUR,
           PIN - 680542


           BY ADV SMT.SREELAKSHMI SABU

RESPONDENTS:

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME
           SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2      STATE POLICE CHIEF
           POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
           PIN - 695014

    3      THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
           DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, YAKKARA ROAD, PALAKKAD, KERALA,
           PIN - 678014

    4      STATION HOUSE OFFICER
           KOTTAYI POLICE STATION, MANKARA - PALAKKAD ROAD,
           KOTTAYI, KERALA, PIN - 678572

    5      V.K SETHUMADHAVAN
                                                     2025:KER:49254
WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

                                2


          KRISHNA KRIPA, THARAVATHUPADI, PERINGOTTUKURISSI P.O,
          VADAKKUMPURAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678574

    6     USHA SETHUMADHAVAN
          W/O SETHUMADHAVAN, KRISHNA KRIPA, THARAVATHUPADI,
          PERINGOTTUKURISSI P.O, VADAKKUMPURAM, PALAKKAD, PIN -
          678574


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
          SMT.VIJINA K.
          SRI.ARUL MURALIDHARAN



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.07.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                           2025:KER:49254
WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

                                     3


                              JUDGMENT

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN (J)

This petition has been filed by the wife

of the alleged detenue, imputing that the latter

is being detained against his wishes by

respondents 5 and 6 - who are his parents.

2. The allegations in this Writ

Petition are rather strange because, the wife

asserts that she has been kept away from her

husband by her in-laws; but conceding in the

same breath that the alleged detenue - the

former, is 37 years in age.

3. However, Sri.Rajesh Sivaramankutty -

learned counsel for the respondents, in

response, asserted that the alleged detenue is

not under detention, but is incapacitated due to

disease, undergoing treatment at home.

4. On hearing Sri.Rajesh Sivaramankutty

as afore, we passed the following order on 2025:KER:49254 WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

30.06.2025:

"Sri.Rajesh Sivaramankutty appears for the respondents 5 and 6 and submits that the alleged detenue, being the son of his clients, is now bedridden on account of a Debilitating medical condition.

2. Though Smt.Sreelakshmi Sabu, appearing for the petitioner, controverts the afore submission, we are of the view that her client should be given an opportunity to meet the alleged detenue in his residence, which is stated to be at Palakkad.

3. We, therefore, allow the petitioner to visit the alleged detenue at the residence of his parents, namely the respondents 5 and 6 at Palakkad, from 11 A.M tomorrow (01.07.2025). She shall be allowed to be with her husband for as long as it is possible without any constraints of time; but ensuring that the alleged detenue is not put to any inconvenience.

4. Since the petitioner expresses an apprehension that she may face impediments in the afore interaction, we direct the 4th respondent, Station House Officer to send a suitable Police Officer, not in uniform to the residence in question at 11 A.M; and 2025:KER:49254 WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

that Officer will ensure that the interaction go so smoothly. Of course, it is not necessary for the Officer so deputed to remain throughout, but it will be sufficient that he / she keeps a watch and so that a report can be then favoured to us through the learned Government Pleader.

List, therefore, on 02.07.2025."

5. Today, we are told that the

petitioner is now residing along with the

alleged detenue in the residence of respondents

5 and 6; and we notice that she has filed an

affidavit before this Court to the effect that

she is willing to take him and admit him in the

"Aster Medcity", Ernakulam on 07.07.2025. She

has also averred that she will take him in an

ambulance, and have him treated.

6. Sri.Sunil Nath - learned Government

Pleader appearing for the official respondents,

conceded that the alleged detenue also seems to

be wanting to go with the petitioner and that 2025:KER:49254 WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

there does not appear to be severe disputes

between them. He suggested that, perhaps, the

disputes are really between the petitioner and

her in-laws, rather than with the alleged

detenue.

7. Sri.Rajesh Sivaramankutty, at this

time, submitted that his clients have absolutely

no objection to their son being taken to the

"Aster Medcity" and given the best care. He,

however, prayed that they be allowed the

opportunity of being part of the treatment and

being with him, subject to the rules of the

hospital.

8. It is thus obvious that there are

hardly any disputes that we need to resolve; and

that we are now enjoined to dispose of this Writ

Petition edificed on the limited consent that we

see between the parties.

In the afore circumstances, this Writ 2025:KER:49254 WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025

Petition is disposed of, recording that the

alleged detenue is not under detention of

respondents 5 and 6, but he is under treatment.

We allow the petitioner to take the

alleged detenue from his paternal house to the

"Aster Medcity" on 07.07.2025 and to admit him

there and continue the treatment, as long as it

is required. We also permit respondents 5 and 6

to be fully involved in the treatment of their

son and to be with him in the hospital, subject

to its rules and regulations.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

                                        M.B. SNEHALATHA
     SAS                                     JUDGE
                                                        2025:KER:49254
WP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025





APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 787/2025

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE GURUVAYUR MUNCIPALITY DATED 2.4.2018. Exhibit P2 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH HER HUSBAND AND CHILD.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE INPATIENT DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY DR. M ZUCCARELLO DATED 16.12.2021. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF THE DETENUE ISSUED FROM CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE DATED 26.3.2024.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SCREENSHOT OF THE MESSAGES OF THE DETENUE WITH THE PETITIONER. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE SCREEN SHOT OF THE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION OF DR. DILIP PANIKAR FROM ASTER MEDICITY ON 7.7.2025. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS RECEIPT OF NOTICE DATED 18.6.2025.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter