Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sajitha N.K vs The Executive Engineer
2025 Latest Caselaw 1048 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1048 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2025

Kerala High Court

Sajitha N.K vs The Executive Engineer on 16 July, 2025

Author: N. Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
                                                        2025:KER:52353


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

     WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 25TH ASHADHA, 1947

                       WP(C) NO. 10802 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

          SAJITHA N.K.
          AGED 44 YEARS
          D/O.ABDUL KAREEM N.K.,
          NALAKATH KALRIKKAL HOUSE,
          THAZHATHANGADI, AREACODE P.O.,
          MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673639


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.BABU S. NAIR
          SMT.SMITHA BABU



RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
          KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT DIVISION,
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KUTTIPURAM,
          MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679571

    2     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS),
          DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MANJERI,
          MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676121

 * ADDL.3 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
          COLLECTRATE, COLLECTORATE ROAD, UP HILL,
          MALAPPURAM, KERALA 676505

          (ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED VIDE
          ORDER DATED 02-04-2025 IN WP(C)NO.10802/2025)
                                            2025:KER:52353
W.P.(C) No.10802/2025
                           :2:




          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.B.ASHOK KUMAR, SC, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT
          PROJECT (KSTP)
          SMT. AMMINIKUTTY, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION   ON  04.06.2025, THE COURT ON  16.07.2025
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                2025:KER:52353
W.P.(C) No.10802/2025
                                      :3:




                           N. NAGARESH, J.

          `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                      W.P.(C) No.10802 of 2025

          `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                Dated this the 16th day of July, 2025


                            JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

The petitioner, who has been allotted with a

petroleum retail outlet by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited,

seeks to quash Ext.P8 and to command the 1st respondent to

remove the barricade separating the public road and the

properties of the petitioner to have complete access to the

properties of the petitioner where the petroleum retail outlet is

being established.

2. To establish the retail petroleum outlet in

Areacode Village in Ernad Taluk in Malappuram District, the

Indian Oil Corporation Limited sought NOC. The District Fire

Officer has given Ext.P2 consent. The District Supply Officer 2025:KER:52353

has issued Ext.P3 consent. The District Town Planner issued

Ext.P4 permission. On the basis of various Consents and

Permits, the Additional District Magistrate issued Ext.P5

Consolidated Consent for establishing the petroleum retail

outlet. Ext.P6 NOC was also issued under the petroleum

rules.

3. The petitioner states that he had applied for

getting a NOC from the Executive Engineer, PWD (Roads)

under whose jurisdiction the Areacode - Mukkom road

situates, where the petroleum retail outlet is being

established. The 2nd respondent-Executive Engineer

informed the ADM that no consent is required from PWD.

When the petitioner started construction of the petroleum

outlet, there were barricades in front of the plot where the

outlet is being established, which separated the road from the

footpath.

4. The petitioner therefore submitted

application to remove the barricades in front of the plot to 2025:KER:52353

have vehicular ingress and egress to the petroleum retail

outlet. The 1st respondent-Executive Engineer, however,

rejected the application as per Ext.P8 stating that for security

reasons, the barricades in front of the plot cannot be

removed. The petitioner states that refusing to remove the

barricades in front of the proposed outlet is per se illegal and

arbitrary. The petitioner therefore seeks to set aside Ext.P8.

8. The 1st respondent filed a counter affidavit.

The 1st respondent stated that the State Highway Koyilandy -

Edavanna road from Eranjimavu to Edavanna is being

upgraded as per Government Orders. The Kerala State

Transport Projects is executing the works having aid from

World Bank and other external funding agencies. A contract

was executed and the work was completed in all respects.

The work was executed as a climate resilient structure and

provisions for safety of commuters were given prime

importance in the project.

2025:KER:52353

9. The barricades were necessary for safety of

pedestrians. The petitioner has been given 5 metres access

to his plot. When the petitioner made a request for wider

access, a site inspection was conducted. It was noticed that

the proposed outlet is situated on a sharp curve on both sides

and the visibility of the motorists is obstructed. If hand rails

are removed, the pedestrians can directly access the road.

As the visibility of the motorists is obstructed by the curved

road, the safety of the pedestrians will be at risk.

10. The 1st respondent further pointed out that

as per Government of India Order dated 26.06.2020, a

petroleum outlet shall not be permitted in the curved portion

of the road. The writ petition is devoid of any merit and is

liable to be dismissed, urged the 1st respondent.

11. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing

the respondents 2 and 3. I have also heard the learned

Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent.

2025:KER:52353

12. The petitioner proposed to start a petroleum

retail outlet of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited. Necessary

applications were made for NOC/Permit before various

statutory authorities. The District Fire Officer has issued

Ex.P2 Consent dated 16.05.2024. The District Supply Officer

has issued Ext.P3 Consent dated 21.05.2024. The District

Town Planner has also granted permission as per Ext.P4

letter dated 19.08.2024. The Additional District Magistrate

has issued Ext.P5 Consolidated Consent for the

establishment of petroleum retail outlet. Ext.P6 is the NOC

issued by the ADM.

13. The petitioner requires sufficient access to

the land where the retail petroleum outlet is being

established. Due to the barricades erected on the footpath

between the public road and the land, access to the land is

restricted. Only 5 metre wide access is given to the plot.

Five metres width is quite insufficient as far as access to

petrol pump is concerned. Separate access for ingress and 2025:KER:52353

egress to the fuel station is necessary.

14. It is true that the retail petroleum outlet is

situated near a curve on the public road which is evident from

Ext.R1(a). At the same time, it is stated that there is a traffic

median in front of the plot of the petroleum retail outlet.

Therefore, if only a 5 metre access is granted to the retail

petroleum outlet, drivers of larger vehicles coming out of the

petroleum retail outlet will find it difficult to manipulate the

vehicle and there is every reason for frequent occurrence of

traffic blocks.

15. If the curve of the road is so dangerous that

petroleum retail outlet is inadvisable, then the statutory

authorities ought to have rejected permission/NOC. After

granting all statutory permissions and clearances to the

petitioner, the authorities will not be justified in denying

sufficient access to the proposed retail petroleum outlet for

vehicular ingress and egress.

2025:KER:52353

16. Ext.P8 is therefore quashed. The

respondents are directed to remove the barricades so as to

give separate ingress and egress points of sufficient width for

the petroleum retail outlet.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/14.07.2025 2025:KER:52353

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10802/2025

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF INTEND ISSUED BY THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKKODE DATED, 24-2-2024 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT FIRE OFFICER DATED, 16-5-


Exhibit P3        A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT ISSUED BY
                  THE     DISTRICT     SUPPLY     OFFICER,
                  MALAPPURAM DATED, 21-5-2024
Exhibit P4        A TRUE COPY OF THE PERMISSION ISSUED
                  BY   THE    DISTRICT    TOWN    PLANNER,
                  MALAPPURAM DATED, 19-8-2024
Exhibit P5        A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED,
                  26-9-2024 OF THE A.D.M., MALAPPURAM
Exhibit P6        A TRUE COPY OF THE NO-OBJECTION ISSUED
                  BY THE A.D.M., MALAPPURAM UNDER THE
                  PETROLEUM RULES DATED, 26-9-2024
Exhibit P7        A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION
                  ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE
                  ADDITIONAL     DISTRICT      MAGISTRATE,
                  MALAPPURAM DATED, 20-6-2024
Exhibit P8        A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FIRST
                  RESPONDENT    DATED,     13-3-2025    AS
                  NO.KSTP/QLD-EDV/124/2020
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1A             A true copy of the Photograph of the
                        site
Exhibit R1B             A true Copy of Guidelines/Norms for

Grant of Permission for construction of access to Fuel Stations etc Dated 26/06/2020

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter