Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2006 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2025
2025:KER:99
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 17TH POUSHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 18950 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
BIJU KURIAN,
AGED 47 YEARS,
S/O. KURIAN, THUMBASSERIL HOUSE,
KOTHANALLUR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686632
BY ADVS.
P.M.JOSEPH
P.S.SAJEEV (CHIRAYIL)
SIBY MATHEW (PULPRA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686002
4 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES (GENERAL),
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686141
2025:KER:99
W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
:2:
5 MNJOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED.
NO. K 73,
MANJOOR P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686603
BY ADVS.
VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
AMRITHA.J(K/552/2020)
KURUVILLA MATHEW(K/426/2023)
VIPIN C. VARGHESE(K/000507/2023)
SMT.SHEEJA C.S., SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.09.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).19394/2024, THE
COURT ON 07.01.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:99
W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
:3:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 17TH POUSHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 19394 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
DEEPTHI BIJU,
AGED 37 YEARS,
W/O. BIJU KURIAN, THUMBASSERIL HOUSE,
KOTHANALLUR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686632
BY ADVS.
P.M.JOSEPH
P.S.SAJEEV (CHIRAYIL)
SIBY MATHEW (PULPRA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686002
2025:KER:99
W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
:4:
4 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES (GENERAL)
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686141
5 MANJOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
LIMITED.NO.K 73,
MANJOOR P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686603
BY ADV.
VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
SHEEJA C.S., SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.09.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).18950/2024, THE
COURT ON 07.01.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:99
W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
:5:
N. NAGARESH, J.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) Nos.18950 and 19394 of 2024
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 7th day of January, 2025
JUDGMENT
~~~~~~~~~
The petitioners in W.P.(C) Nos.18950 and
19394 of 2024, who are members of the 5 th respondent-Co-
operative Bank are aggrieved by the interim order passed under
Sections 69 and 70 read with Rules 67 and 68 of the Kerala Co-
operative Societies Act and the Rules, in the petitions filed by
the petitioners in arbitration proceedings initiated by the 4 th
respondent.
2. The petitioners state that they were served with
notice dated 12.12.2014, in which it was stated that the 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
petitioners had obtained loans and amounts are due and
payable to the Bank now. The petitioners were directed to remit
the amount on or before 23.12.2014, as per Ext.P1 notice. The
petitioners state that it was the father-in-law of the petitioner in
W.P.(C) No.18950 of 2024, who obtained the loan during the
year 2012, mortgaging 40 Cents of landed property of the
petitioner. The petitioner's father-in-law obtained the loan with
the help of a Director Board member. The petitioner approached
his father-in-law and there was an oral settlement pursuant to
which the father-in-law remitted ₹24 lakhs to the 5 th respondent-
Bank. The father-in-law thereafter entered into Ext.P2
agreement dated 27.07.2015 with the petitioner.
3. The petitioner states that the father-in-law
violated the terms of the agreement and did not clear the loan
account. The petitioner preferred complaints before the
Kaduthuruty Police and the Superintendent of Police, Kottayam,
seeking to make an enquiry in the matter.
2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
4. The secretary of the 5th respondent-Bank filed
Ext.P3 A.R.C. No.770 of 2016 before the 4 th respondent for
realising an amount of ₹21,39,744/- which was the liability up to
30.06.2016. The petitioner, thereupon, submitted Ext.P4 request
seeking copies of 28 documents, in order to defend the A.R.C.
effectively. The counsel appearing for the Bank handed over
copies of certain documents. From the documents, the petitioner
found that only one Director has signed the valuation report.
5. On 11.01.2022, the Secretary and Manager of
the Bank along with three persons came to the petitioners'
house and informed that the property of the petitioners will be
put to sale and a sale notice will be published soon. The
petitioner, therefore, filed Ext.P7 interim petition before the
Arbitration Court seeking direction to give copies of 19
documents to the petitioner for defending the A.R.C. The
petitioner needs these crucial documents which would reveal
fraud and collusion. However, the Secretary of the Bank filed 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
Ext.P8 objection to the request made by the petitioner.
6. The 4th respondent rejected the application of
the petitioners as per Ext.P9 order stating that the 5 th
respondent has produced enough documents for filing the plaint
and that the documents sought by the petitioners cannot be
granted at this stage. The petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P9
order.
7. The petitioners state that Ext.P9 interim order
is illegal and arbitrary. The Arbitrator failed to properly
appreciate the facts of the case in its true perspective. There is
error apparent on the face of Ext.P9 order. Unless the
documents sought for by the petitioners are provided, the
petitioners will not be able to establish that the alleged
borrowers were not disbursed with the loan amounts.
8. The 5th respondent resisted the writ petition
filing counter affidavit. The 5th respondent submitted that
petitioners are the borrowers of the loan and are guarantors to 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
another loan. The property of the petitioners was mortgaged as
security. The attempt of the petitioners is to protract the
proceedings for recovery. There is nothing wrong in Ext.P9
order. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed, contended the
5th respondent.
9. I have heard the learned Counsel for the
petitioners, the learned Senior Government Pleader
representing respondents 1 to 4 and the learned counsel
appearing for the 5th respondent.
10. The petitioners state that the father-in-
law/father of the petitioners obtained a loan pledging the
property of the petitioners as security, without their knowledge.
The petitioners took up the matter with the father and there was
an understanding that he will remit the loan amounts to the
Bank. The terms of the agreement were violated. The petitioners
filed complaint before the Superintendent of Police which was of
no avail. The Secretary of the Bank, thereafter, filed A.R.C. 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
No.770 of 2016. The petitioners submitted applications
requesting to provide copies of certain documents in order to
defend the A.R.C. Those documents were not given to the
petitioners. The applications submitted by the petitioners before
the Arbitration Court for supply of documents stand rejected as
per Ext.P9 interim order. Ext.P9 interim order is under
challenge.
11. In Ext.P9 interim order, the Arbitration Court
noted that the petitioners are members of the Bank and that they
can approach the Bank directly and file applications for copies of
documents under Section 103 of the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act, 1969. The petitioners did not do so. Without doing
so, the petitioners have submitted an application before the
Arbitrator just before the evidence stage.
12. The Arbitrator noted that the petitioners could
have obtained copies of loan applications directly from the Bank.
If Statement of Accounts are necessary, the Arbitration Court 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
can require the Bank to produce the same at the time of
evidence and at that stage, the petitioners can peruse the same.
Copies of vouchers can be obtained from the Bank under
Section 103. For all the afore reasons, the Arbitration Court
found that the direction sought for by the petitioners cannot be
granted at this stage of arbitral proceedings.
13. I find that the reasoning of the Arbitration Court
for declining the interim relief sought for by the petitioners is just
and proper. I find no reason to interfere with Ext.P9 orders.
The writ petitions are therefore dismissed.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/06.01.2025 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18950/2024
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 12.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER, SISTER OF HIS WIFE AND HIS FATHER-IN-LAW DATED 27.07.2015.
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ARC NO.770/2016 FILED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.2016.
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPIES OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITIONS DATED 20.06.2018 AND 27.06.2018.
Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 24.07.2012 OF THE COMMITTEE.
Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLIANT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.01.2022.
Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 18.10.2023.
Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.2023.
ExhibitP9 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 02.05.2024 IN ARC NO.770/2016.
2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
Ext.R(5)(a) True copy of the loan sanction letter dated 14.01.2015
Ext.R(5)(b) True copy of the loan application dated 05.01.2015 submitted in loan No.OF-I-717
Ext.R(5)(c) True copy of the loan application dated 05.01.2015 submitted in loan No.OF-I-716
Ext.R(5)(d) True copy of the receipt dated 05.01.2015 issued by the wife of the petitioner
Ext.R(5)(e) True copy of the plaint in ARC No.769/2016 Dated 04.07.2016 ,Vaikom Cooperative Societies, Asst Registrar (General) Vaikom.
Ext.R(5)(f) True copy of the summons dated 03.10.2016 issued by Arbitrator, Cooperative Societies,attached to the office of Asst Registrar (General) Vaikom.
Ext.R(5)(g) True copy of the decision taken by committee on 05.05.2016 for initiating ARC against Deepthi Biju
Ext.R(5)(h) True copy of the plaint in ARC No.770/2016 ( loan No.OF-I-
717)Cooperative Societies,attached to the office of Asst Registrar (General) Vaikom.
Ext.R(5)(i) True copy of the Summons dated 08.10.2016 issued by the special sale officer, the Arbitrator in ARC
2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
Ext.R(5)(j) True copy of the decision taken by board of directors on 05.05.2016 for initiating ARC 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19394/2024
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 12.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER, HER SISTER AND HER FATHER DATED 27.07.2015.
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ARC NO.769/2016 FILED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.2016.
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION DATED 13.06.2018.
Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 24.07.2012 OF THE COMMITTEE.
Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLIANT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND HER HUSBAND BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.01.2022.
Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 18.10.2023.
Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.2023.
Exhibit-P9 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 02.05.2024 IN ARC NO.769/2016.
Exhibit-P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P.(C) 2025:KER:99 W.P.(C) Nos.18950 & 19394/2024
NO.18950/2024 DATED 24.05.2024 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
Ext R5(a) True copy of the loan sanction letter dated 14.01.2015 Ext R5(b) True copy of the loan application dated 05.01.2015 submitted in loan No.OF-I-716 Ext R5(c) True copy of the loan application dated 05.01.2015 submitted in loan No.OF-I-717 Ext R5(d) True copy of the receipt dated 05.01.2015 issued by the husband of the petitioner Ext R5(f) True copy of the summons dated 03.10.2016 issued by Arbitrator, Co-
operative Societies, attached to the office of Asst Registrar (General), Vaikom.
Ext R5(g) True copy of the decision taken by Committee on 05.05.2016 for initiating ARC against petitioner and her husband Ext R5(h) True copy of the plaint in ARC No.770/2016 ( loan No.OF-I-717) Co- operative Societies, attached to the office of Asst Registrar(General), Vaikom.
Ext R5(i) True copy of the Summons dated 08.10.2016 issued by the Special Sale Officer, the Arbitrator in ARC
Ext R5(j) True copy of the decision taken by Board of Directors on 05.05.2016 for initiating ARC Ext R5(e) True copy of the plaint in ARC No.769/2016 Co-operative Societies, attached to the office of Asst Registrar(General), Vaikom.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!