Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ameyavarun vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 1894 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1894 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2025

Kerala High Court

Ameyavarun vs State Of Kerala on 3 January, 2025

WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

                                   1

                                                           2025:KER:56

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

        FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 13TH POUSHA, 1946

                        WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

            AMEYAVARUN
            AGED 15 YEARS
            STD.IX,ST.JOSEPHS ANGLO INDIAN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,
            KOZHICODE 673 032 REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER VARUN
            BHASKER,AGED 45 YEARS, MACHANGALATHU HOUSE,
            KARUVISSERY P.O,KOZHICODE, PIN - 673010


            BY ADVS.
            MANSOOR.B.H.
            SAKEENA BEEGUM


RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
            GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECERATARIATE,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2       THE GENERAL CONVENOR
            KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOTSAVAM 2024-25,
            ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC
            INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC
            INSTRUCTIONS, VAZHUTHACAUD-POOJAPPURA ROAD JUNCTION,
            JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

    3       THE CONVENER
            PROGRAMME COMMITTEE, KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOTSAVAM,
            DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
            OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
            VAZHUTHACAUD-POOJAPPURA ROAD JUNCTION, JAGATHY,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

    4       THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
            PAREEKSHABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CHAIRMAN APPEAL
 WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

                                2

                                                         2025:KER:56

          COMMITTEE, KOZHICODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL
          KALOTSAVAM, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012


               SMT. SURYA BINOY - SR.GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

                                     3

                                                              2025:KER:56

                           JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2025)

The petitioner's team participated in the 'Bandmelam'

item in the Higher Secondary competition in the 35th

Kozhikode Revenue District School Kalotsavam. However, the

petitioner's team could secure only the 2 nd position, without an

A Grade. Two grounds are raised by the learned Counsel for

the petitioner. First of all, the petitioner's team, going by the

marks it obtained, is entitled to A Grade. Secondly, their

performance was seriously affected due to the presence of

gravel in the ground.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner pointed out

that the appeal was dismissed vide Ext.P3, on a wrong

premise that the petitioner is not entitled to any grade.

Inviting the attention of this Court to Ext.P2 at page No.12, it

was pointed out that, any team which obtains a mark more

than 239 and above, is entitled to A Grade. It was pointed out,

by relying up on Ext.P2, at page No.11, that the petitioner's

team obtained 264 marks. Therefore, they are entitled to A

Grade. Thus, the learned Counsel would submit that WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

2025:KER:56

interference of this Court is required.

3. The above submissions were seriously opposed by

the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court finds merit in the submission made by

the learned Counsel for the petitioner as regards the

petitioner's claim for A Grade. As is clear from Ext.P2 at page

No.11, the petitioner's team had obtained 264 marks, which is

obviously more than the cut off marks of 239. Therefore, the

team is entitled to be an A Grade.

5. However, the same, by itself, will not enable the

petitioner to the substantive reliefs sought for in the writ

petition, that is to say, for participation in the State

Kalotsavam. It is indisputed that the petitioner's team had

obtained five marks less than the team which obtained the

first position. The reason stated for the poor performance is

the alleged existence of gravel in the ground. This cannot be

recognized for the poor performance of the petitioner's team,

for the reason that the said infirmity, if real, is common to all

the teams which participated, wherefore, the petitioner's

team cannot pick up any peculiar disadvantage because of

the same.

WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

2025:KER:56

In the circumstances, the dominant relief sought for in

the writ petition cannot be allowed. Therefore, this writ

petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE LU WP(C) NO. 46618 OF 2024

2025:KER:56

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 46618/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FEE RECEIPT DATED 23/11/2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RESULT AND SCORE SHEET OF THE EVENT BANDMELAM, HS GENERAL OF DISTRICT SCHOOL, KALOTSAVAM

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER REJECTING APPEAL ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEARING C2/9152/2024(56) DATED 7/12/2024

// True Copy // PA To Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter