Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 11751 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11751 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2025

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025         1                    2025:KER:95044

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

 WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947

                      CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025

        CRIME NO.38/2020 OF Mannuthy Police Station, Thrissur

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.191 OF 2020 OF

SPECIAL COURT OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR

FOR THE TRIAL OF CASES UNDER THE PRIZE CHITS AND MONEY CIRCULATION

SCHEME (BANNING) ACT, 1978

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 8 :

    1       SGS AGRO FARMS LTD,
            REPRESENTED ITS CHAIRMAN, S.G.SEKAR, 59,1STFLOOR, 2ND
            STREET,SECRETARIAT COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN -
            600010

    2       S.G.SEKAR,
            AGED 65 YEARS
            S/O.P.SUBBUNADAR, 4, SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN LODGE
            COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    3       RAJAKUMAR GANASEKAR,
            AGED 38 YEARS
            S/O.GANASEKAR,1-3,GROUND FLOOR, BHARATH FLATS,R.V.
            NAGAR EAST,NEAR J.JAYALALITHA BASKET BALL INDOOR
            STADIUM,ANNA NAGAR EAST, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN -
            600012

    4       ROBIN VIJAYKUMAR,
            AGED 36 YEARS
            S/O.GANGA SUNDARAM, 294,PURASAWAKKAM,HIGH ROAD,
            KELLEYSCHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600010

    5       G.SATISHDAS,
            AGED 40 YEARS
            S/O.S.G.SEKAR,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
            COLONYKELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010
 CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025        2                   2025:KER:95044


    6     G.SHANTHI,
          AGED 59 YEARS
          W/O.S.G.SEKAR, 4,SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    7     G.SANDEEP DAS,
          AGED 34 YEARS
          S/O.S.G.SEKAR,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    8     S.FAUSTINA,
          AGED 35 YEARS
          W/O.G.SATISHDAS,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
          SRI.M.H.ASIF ALI
          SHRI.ARAVIND T RAMESH
          SHRI.ASHIK ALI M.H.
          SMT.ASWATHI K.C.




RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2     SUBAIDA,
          AGED 66 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN,MATHILAKATH HOUSE,
          MANATTUKUNNU,KALLETTUMKARA,ALUR,THRISSUR, PIN - 680683


          BY ADV SHRI.ITTY PAULSON

          SR PP SMT SEETHA S


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025           3                     2025:KER:95044

                              C.S.DIAS, J.
                  ---------------------------------------
                    CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025
          ------------------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 10th day of December, 2025

                                ORDER

The petitioners are the accused Nos 1 to 8 in

C.C.No.191/2020 on the file of the Special Court of the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, for the trial

of cases under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation

Scheme (Banning), Act, 1978, (Trial Court), which has

arisen from Crime No.38/2020 registered by the Mannuthy

Police Station, Thrissur, alleging the commission of the

offence punishable under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of

the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the

Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning),

Act, 1978.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025 4 2025:KER:95044

further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that

the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has

been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd

respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit,

affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned

Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that,

with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the

parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd

respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not wish

to pursue the prosecution, and has no objection to the

proceedings being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the Investigating Officer has not recorded the

statement of the 2nd respondent. However, the State has

no objection to the Criminal Miscellaneous case being CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025 5 2025:KER:95044

allowed.

6. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this

Court to quash criminal proceedings on the ground of

settlement between the parties have been authoritatively

laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Gian Singh v.

State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], State of Madhya

Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC

688], Naushey Ali v. State of U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78],

and in a host of judicial pronouncements. It is held that in

cases where the offences are not grave or heinous, and

where the parties have amicably settled the dispute, to

secure the ends of justice, the High Court may invoke its

inherent powers to quash the proceedings, particularly if

continuation of the prosecution would serve no fruitful

purpose.

7. On an overall consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the present case, and the materials on

record, I am satisfied that: the offences alleged are not CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025 6 2025:KER:95044

heinous or of a serious nature; no public interest or

element of societal concern is involved; the chances of

conviction are remote in view of the settlement; and the

continuation of the proceedings would merely burden the

judicial process without advancing the cause of justice.

Furthermore, the settlement would promote harmony

between the parties and restore peace. Hence, this Court

is persuaded to hold that this is a fit case to exercise its

inherent jurisdiction.

In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed. Accordingly,

Annexure A1 Final Report in Crime No.38/2020 of the

Mannuthy Police Station, Thrissur and all further

proceedings in C.C. No.191/2020 on the file of the Trial

Court, as against the petitioners, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

SCB/10.12.25.

CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025 7 2025:KER:95044

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 10962 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.38/2020 OF MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR Annexure A2 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DT.08/10/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter