Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarath Sasidharan vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 11643 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11643 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sarath Sasidharan vs State Of Kerala on 1 December, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
                                                     2025:KER:92966
CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

                                 1


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

 MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947

                      CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

   CRIME NO.256/2021 OF Ranni Police Station, Pathanamthitta

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.794 OF 2023 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,RANNI

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            SARATH SASIDHARAN
            AGED 33 YEARS
            S/O SASIDHARAN PILLAI, VECHUTHUNDIYIL
            HOUSE,CHETHAKKAL P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689677


            BY ADVS.
            SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.
            SMT.SAKEENA BEEGUM




RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            RANNI POLICE STATION PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689533

    3       VIJAYAN PILLA
            AGED 62 YEARS
            S/O SIVARAMAN PILLA KIZHAKETHIL VEEDU,
            CHETHAKKAL P. O, CHETHAKKAL, PATHANAMTHITTA,
            PIN - 689533
                                                  2025:KER:92966
CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

                                 2




          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.A.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA
          SHRI.S.PRAKASH

          PP SRI. M.P.PRASANTH



     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                     2025:KER:92966
CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

                                  3




                            ORDER

Dated this the 1st day of December, 2025

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.794/2023

on the file of the Court of the Judicial First-Class

Magistrate-I, Ranni (Trial Court), which originates from

Crime No.256/2021 registered by the Ranni Police Station,

Pathanamthitta, alleging the commission of the offences

punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 447 and 427

r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5 of

the Kerala Prevention of Damage to Private Property and

Payment of Compensation Act, 2019.

2. The crux of the prosecution allegation is that,

on 26.08.2020, at around 17.00 hours, the accused

persons, in prosecution of their common intention, had

formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and

demolished the gate and boundary wall of the de facto

complainant using an excavator and caused a loss of 2025:KER:92966 CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

Rs.58,272/-. Thus, the accused have committed the above

offences.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that, even if the allegations in Annexure A final report are

taken on their face value, the same will not constitute the

offences charged against the petitioner. There is no

material to substantiate the petitioner's involvement in the

crime. A reading of the first information report would

show that the petitioner was not even named as an accused

in the crime. Subsequently, the petitioner was arraigned

as an accused in the crime. Since there is no corroborative

material, the chances of conviction are bleak. Therefore,

all further proceedings in the above crime may be quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

Crl.M.C. She submits that there are sufficient materials to

prove the petitioner's culpability in the crime. The 2025:KER:92966 CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

petitioner was identified on the date of incident itself. It

is on that basis that the final report has been filed. There is

a specific overt act attributed against the petitioner. He

along with other accused had trespassed into the property

of the 3rd respondent, demolished the boundary and

widened the public pathway by using an excavator. The

petitioner and the other accused persons had caused a loss

of Rs.58,272/- to the 3rd respondent. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

may be dismissed.

6. The petitioner's present attempt is to quash

Annexure A final report and all further proceedings in C.C.

No. 794/2023 of the Trial Court.

7. On a perusal of the materials on record, I find

that the petitioner had filed a writ petition to quash the

First Information Report and all further proceedings in the

crime. However, by Annexure D judgment, this Court had

dismissed the writ petition, and directed the petitioner to

surrender before the jurisdictional court, and after the 2025:KER:92966 CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

investigation was completed, to file a discharge petition.

This Court also directed the Trial Court to consider the

discharge petition without insisting for the petitioner's

presence. It seems that the petitioner has not complied

with the said directions, Instead he has filed this Criminal

Miscellaneous case to quash the final report.

8. In light of the directions in the above judgment,

I hold that the petitioner cannot re-agitate the matter by

filing a fresh Crl.M.C., seeking to quash Annexure A final

report, without first complying with the directions in the

judgment, that is to file a discharge petition before the

Trial Court at the appropriate stage. Hence, I am of the

definite view that it would be upto the petitioner to first

comply with the directions in Annexure D judgment, and if

the petitioner is aggrieved by any order, he would be at

liberty to work out his remedies in accordance with law.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dispose of the Crl.

M.C., by permitting the petitioner to workout his remedies 2025:KER:92966 CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

as directed in Annexure D judgment. If such application is

filed, the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of

the same, in accordance with law, untrammelled by any

observation made in this order. Thereafter, if the

petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the Trial

Court, he would be at liberty to workout his remedies in

accordance with law.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rmm/1/12/2025 2025:KER:92966 CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 2466 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO:256/2021 OF RANNI POLICE STATION Annexure B TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 29/12/2021 BEARING NO:DB2-390/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION,PATHANAMTHITTA Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE PENTA CARE SERVICES LIMITED DATED 28/9/2023 Annexure D TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 1.11.2023 IN W.P.(CRL).NO.1063/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter