Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3501 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2025
W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
1 2025:KER:60842
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.
TH
THURSDAY, THE 14
DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 23RD SRAVANA,
1947
WA NO. 1418 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.10.2021 IN WP(C)
NO.929 OF 2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:
1
ARUVAKKAD PADASEKHARA KARSHAKA UNION
M
REG NO.ER.42/75, MARUVAKKAD, CHELLANAM, P.O,
KOCHI-18, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRE+TARY K J JACOB,
AGED 64 YEARS, S/O JOSEPH, KAITHAVALAPPIL HOUSE,
CHELLANAM P.O, KOCHI-682008.
2
NTONY JOMON
A
AGED 36 YEARS
S/O JOB, ARIVEETTIL HOUSE, SOUTH CHELLANAM,
KOCHI-682008.
Y ADVS.
B
SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)
SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
2 2025:KER:60842
1 ISHERIES INSPECTOR F CHELLANAM, PIN-682008.
2 EGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES R DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682018.
3 ISTRICT COLLECTOR D CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682030.
4 HANTHU C S/O MINNYAN, MANCHADIPPARAMBIL, CHELLANAM P.O, MARUVAKKAD, KOCHI-682008.
5 TATE OF KERALA S REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
Y ADVS. B GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.RENJITH SPL.GP SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB SHRI.K.P.JAYACHANDRAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL
HIS T WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.08.2025, ALONG WITH WP(C).20697/2023, THE COURT ON 14.08.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
3 2025:KER:60842
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.
TH THURSDAY, THE 14 DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 23RD SRAVANA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 20697 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
HELLANAM MARUVAKKAD PADASEKHARA KARSHAKODHARANA C SAMITHI,REG. NO. EKM/TC/355/2018, MARUVAKKAD, CHELLANAM, COCHIN -682008 REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT ANTONY, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O ALBERT, KURISHINGAL (H), MARUVAKKAD, NORTH CHELLANAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682008 .
BY ADV SMT.G.VIDYA
RESPONDENTS:
1 ISTRICT COLLECTOR D CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030
2 RINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER P ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682030
3 EGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES R DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, ERNAKULAM- 68 20 18 W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
4 2025:KER:60842
4 EVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER R REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORT COCHIN, PIN - 682001
5 HE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER T CHELLANAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 008.
6 ARUVAKKAD PADASEKHARA KARSHAKA UNION M REG. NO. ER/75, CHELLANAM.P.0, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY K.J.JACOB, S/O JOSEPH,KAITHAVALAPPIL (H),CHELLANAM.P.0, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682008
Y ADVS. B SRI.S.RENJITH SPL. GP. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN SR. SRI.S.SUJIN SMT.NITA.N.S.
HIS T WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.08.2025, ALONG WITH WA.1418/2021, THE COURT ON 14.08.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
5 2025:KER:60842
JUDGMENT
[WA No.1418/2021, W.P(C)No.20697/2023]
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-court appeal filedunder Section5 ofthe
Kerala High Court Act, 1958, arises out of the judgment dated
22.10.2021 passed in W.P(C)No.929 of 2021, whereby the learned
Single Judge had disposed of the writ petition.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants/
petitioners had challenged Ext.P4 proceedings issued by the 3rd
respondent District Collector dated 10.03.2020 directing the
appellants/petitionersnottoconduct auctionofthefishingright
of the Padasekharam before 31st October every year and not to W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
6 2025:KER:60842
operatethesluicebefore15thNovember.ThelearnedSingleJudge
without interfering with the proceedings, disposed of the same.
3.Beingaggrieved,thepresentwritappealhasbeenfiledby
the appellants only on the limited ground that condition No.1
mentioned in the order dated 10.03.2020 that is "As per the
prevailing criteria steps forauctioningthe chalcanbe takenonlyafter
October, 31st" is contrary to the second line; ie, "If the auction
proceedings areconducted beforeOctober 31st,fishingactivities will be
strictly prohibited during the said period when paddy cultivation
activitiesarebeingcarriedout."Restoftheconditions,viz;condition
numbers 2 to 5 of the order dated 10.03.2020 is not pressed or
challenged. W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
7 2025:KER:60842
4.Thelearnedcounselfortheappellantscontendedthatthe
aforesaidcondition createsalot ofproblem forthe appellantsto
start the fishing activities on time when the paddy
cultivation/harvesting is over. The learned counsel further
submitted that the auction is to beconductedinJuly orAugust,
much earlier to the commencement of fish culturing from 1st
November. Otherwise nobody will be available to take the
contract. The learned Single Judge without considering the
grounds raised challenging Ext.P4 order, disposed of the writ
petition.Thelearnedcounselfortheappellants,therefore,prayed
that the writ appeal be allowed.
5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the
respondents submitted that theyhave noobjectiontomodifying W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
8 2025:KER:60842
thefirst sentenceofCondition No.1, subject tothe riderthatno
rightoverthepaddyfieldsforfishingactivitieswouldaccrueuntil
the statutory period notified in the order has expired.
Accordingly,thefirstsentenceofConditionNo.1intheimpugned
order may be modified to that extent.
6.Heardthelearnedcounselforthepartiesandperusedthe
records.
7. On a perusal of the impugned order, Ext. P4 dated
10.03.2020, itisevident thatthere is acontradictionbetweenthe
two sentences in condition No.1. The first sentence permits the
appellants to take steps for auctioning the chal only after 31st
October eachyear. Whereasthesecondsentenceenvisagesthatif
the auction proceedings are conducted before October 31st, W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
9 2025:KER:60842
fishing activitieswillbestrictlyprohibitedduringthesaidperiod
when paddy cultivation activities are being carried out. There
appears to be a contradiction between two sentences.
8. Asa result, weclarifythatthe appellantsmaytake steps
forauctioningthechal priortoOctober31steachyearasperthe
prevailingcriteria,butwouldnotenterintofishingcontractprior
to 31stOctoberandthatnorightwouldaccruetothecontractors
toenterthefieldspriortothestatutoryperiodnotifiedfromtime
to time.
With the above slight modification, the writ appeal is
disposedof finally.Thepresentorderbereadinconjunctionwith
the judgment dated 22.10.2021 passed in W.P(C)No.929 of 2021.
ThesaidjudgmentshallalsogovernW.P.(C)No.20697of2023,and W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
10 2025:KER:60842
shall apply with full forceto thefacts and circumstancesofthat
case. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI JUDGE
Sd/- SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE
MC/12.8 W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
11 2025:KER:60842
APPENDIX OF WA 1418/2021
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE R5(a) rue T copy of the proceedings of the District Collector dated 17.02.2025 along with the translation. W.A.No.1418 of 2021 & WP(C)No.20697 of 2023
12 2025:KER:60842
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20697/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 HE T TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 09.02.2023
Exhibit-P2 HE T TRUE COPY OF THE POTHUYOGAM NOTICE ISSUED BY 6TH RESPONDENT DATED 18.06.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!