Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Valsala T vs United India Insurance Company Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 3400 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3400 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Valsala T vs United India Insurance Company Ltd on 12 August, 2025

                                                2025:KER:60606



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA

  TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 21ST SRAVANA, 1947

                      MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

        AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 31.01.2019 IN OPMV NO.310 OF

2017 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , PALAKKAD

APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

    1      VALSALA T.
           AGED 45 YEARS
           W/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY,
           PALAKKAL HOUSE, THRIKADEERI.P.O,
           MANGODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679503

    2      USHA @ NAYAPULLY USHA,
           AGED 35 YEARS, D/O. LATE KRISHNANKUTTY,
           W/O.NAYAPULLY NARAYANAUNNI, NAYAPULLY,
           UNGINTHARA, VEERAMANGALAM, THRIKKADEERI.P.O,
           PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679503

    3      RAVIKUMAR P
           AGED 33 YEARS
           S/O. LATE KRISHNANKUTTY,
           PALAKKAL HOUSE, THRIKADEERI.P.O,
           MANGODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679503

    4      GAYATHRI KRISHNA(MINOR)
           AGED 12 YEARS
           S/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, PALAKKAL HOUSE,
           THRIKADEERI.P.O, MANGODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679503
           REP BY 1ST APPELLANT MOTHER AND GUARDIAN
           VALSAL T-1ST APPELLATE IS THE WIFE AND 2ND, 3RD
           AND 4TH APPELLANTS ARE CHILDREN OF DECEASED
           KRISHNANKUTTY

           BY ADV SRI.BABY MATHEW
                                                2025:KER:60606
MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

                              2



RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:

           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
           REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, P B MO 12,
           D BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, PAZERY PLAZA, KODATHIPADI,
           MANNARKKAD-678582
           WITH COMMUNICATION ADDRESS AT
           UNITED INIDA INSURANCE CO LTD, DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
           3RD FLOOR, MALABAR FORT COMPLEX, KANDATH COMPLEX,
           OFF-G B ROAD, PALAKKAD.P.O, 678003
           INSURER OF TRIPPER LOTTY KL-16 H-355,
           POLICY NO.101205311P108448275 VALID FROM
           20.10.2015 TO 21.10.2016

           BY ADV SMT.DEEPA GEORGE


     THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
HEARING ON 12.08.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                                               2025:KER:60606
MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

                                       3



                              C.S.SUDHA, J.
              ----------------------------------------------------
                        M.A.C.A. No.342 of 2020
              ----------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 12th day of August 2025

                              JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act) by the claim petitioners in O.P.(MV)

No.310/2017 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Palakkad, (the Tribunal), aggrieved by the amount of compensation

granted by Award dated 31/01/2019. The sole respondent herein is

the third respondent/insurer in the petition. In this appeal, the

parties and documents will be referred to as described in the

original petition.

2. According to the claim petitioners, on 03/07/2016

at about 06:30 a.m. while the deceased was riding his scooter,

tipper lorry bearing registration no.KL-16H-355 driven by the

second respondent in a rash and negligent manner knocked him

down, as a result of which he sustained grievous injuries to which 2025:KER:60606 MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

he succumbed.

3. The first respondent/owner and the second

respondent/driver of the offending vehicle filed joint written

statement denying negligence on the part of the latter. The age,

occupation and income of the deceased were disputed. It was also

contended that the compensation claimed was quite excessive.

4. The third respondent/insurer filed written

statement admitting the existence of a valid policy in respect of the

offending vehicle.

5. Before the Tribunal, no oral evidence was

adduced by either side. Exts.A1 to A17 were marked on the side of

the claim petitioners and Ext.B1 was marked on the side of the third

respondent/insurer.

6. The Tribunal on consideration of the documentary

evidence and after hearing both sides, found negligence on the part

of the second respondent/driver of the offending vehicle resulting in

the incident and hence awarded an amount of ₹7, 47,000/- together 2025:KER:60606 MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the petition till

realisation along with proportionate costs. Aggrieved by the Award,

claim petitioners have come up in appeal.

7. The only point that arises for consideration in this

appeal is whether there is any infirmity in the findings of the

Tribunal calling for an interference by this Court.

8. Heard both sides

9. The award of compensation by the Tribunal under

the following head is challenged by the claim petitioners -

Loss of consortium & loss of love and affection

Admittedly, the claim petitioners are the wife and three

children of the deceased. Going by the dictums in Magma General

Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram, (2018) 18

SCC 130: 2018 KHC 6697, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v.

Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur, AIR 2020 SC 3076: 2023 KHC

760 and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Somwati, 2020 KHC

6530 : (2020) 9 SCC 644, they are entitled to an amount of 2025:KER:60606 MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

₹40,000/- each towards loss of spousal and parental consortium

respectively. The Tribunal has granted an amount of ₹40,000/-

towards loss of consortium and an amount of ₹1,00,000/- towards

loss of love and affection. It is well settled that when loss of

consortium is awarded, no further amount can be awarded for loss

of love and affection. The claim petitioners, four in number, are

entitled to a total amount of ₹1,60,000/-, out of which an amount of

₹1,40,000/-, including the amount of ₹1,00,000/- under the wrong

head of love and affection, has been granted. Therefore, I find that

they are entitled to the balance amount of ₹20,000/- towards loss of

consortium.

10. The impugned Award is modified to the following

extent:

Sl. Head of claim Amount Amount Modified in No. claimed Awarded appeal (in ₹) by (in ₹) Tribunal (in ₹)

1. Transport to 10,000/- 2,000/- 2,000/-

      hospital                                     (No Modification)
                                                             2025:KER:60606
MACA NO. 342 OF 2020





 2.   Funeral expenses         25,000/-       15,000/-        15,000/-
                                                          (No Modification)
 3.   Compensation for        1,00,000/-      15,000/-        15,000/-
      loss of estate                                      (No Modification)
 4.   Loss of consortium      1,00,000/-      40,000/-       1,60,000/-
                                                            (40,000 x 4))
 5.   Compensation for         25,000/-       15,000/-        15,000/-
      pain and suffering                                  (No Modification)
 6.   Loss of love and        2,00,000/-     1,00,000/-      Deducted
      affection
 7.   Compensation for       20,00,000/-     5,60,000/-      5,60,000/-
      loss of dependency                                  (No Modification)
             Total                           7,47,000/-      7,67,000/-



In the result, the appeal is partly allowed by enhancing the

compensation by a further amount of ₹20,000/- (total

compensation ₹7,67,000/- that is, ₹7,47,000/- granted by the

Tribunal + ₹20,000/- granted in appeal) with interest at the rate of

8% per annum from the date of petition till date of realization

(excluding the period of 296 days delay in filing the appeal) and

proportionate costs. The third respondent/insurer is directed to

deposit the aforesaid amount before the Tribunal within a period of

60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. On 2025:KER:60606 MACA NO. 342 OF 2020

deposit of the amount, the Tribunal shall disburse the amount to the

claim petitioners at the earliest in accordance with law after making

deductions, if any.

Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand

closed.

Sd/-

C.S.SUDHA JUDGE

NP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter