Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hali Harison vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 2238 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2238 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Hali Harison vs State Of Kerala on 5 August, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
                                                          2025:KER:58413


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

     TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1947

                      BAIL APPL. NO. 8784 OF 2025

               CRIME NO.43/2024 OF KOLLAM E.E, KOLLAM

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 16.06.2025 IN BAIL APPL.

               NO.5405 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONER/ACCUSED (IN CUSTODY FROM 05.10.2024):

            HALI HARISON
            AGED 41 YEARS
            S/O. HARISON, HALI BHAVANAM, VATTATHARA JUNCTION,
            PADAPPAKKARA, PERAYAM VILLAGE NOW RESIDING AT KODIYIL
            VEEDU, KANJIRACODE, PERAYAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT,
            PIN - 691501.

            BY ADVS.
            SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH
            SRI.LIBIN STANLEY
            SMT.SAIPOOJA
            SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL
            SMT.R.GAYATHRI
            SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA
            SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH
            SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE

RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031.

    2       ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER
            EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD,
            KOLLAM DISTRICT,, PIN - 691001.

            SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


     THIS    BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
05.08.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A.NO. 8784 OF 2025

                                       2

                                                             2025:KER:58413


                          BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                         ...............................................
                             B.A. No. 8784 of 2025
                         ...............................................
                     Dated this the 05th day of August, 2025

                                      ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 43/2024 of the

Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Kollam, registered

alleging offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS'

Act').

3. According to the prosecution, 05.10.2024, at about 06:00

AM, the Circle Inspector, Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special

Squad, Kollam, seized 42.06 Kg of ganja from the possession of the

petitioner and thereby the accused committed the offences alleged.

Petitioner was arrested on 05.10.2024 and he has been in custody

since then.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

petitioner has been in custody since 05.10.2024. It was submitted that

the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner or his

relatives at the time of his arrest.

B.A.NO. 8784 OF 2025

2025:KER:58413

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and

submitted that the grounds for arrest were communicated to the

petitioner at the time of his arrest. It was also submitted that since the

contraband seized from the petitioner was a commercial quantity, the

rigour under section 37 of NDPS Act will apply and hence petitioner

ought not to be released on bail.

6. Though prima facie there are materials on record to connect

the petitioner with the crime, since petitioner has raised the question of

absence of communication of the grounds for his arrest, this Court is

obliged to consider the said issue.

7. In the decisions in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and

Others, [(2024) 7 SCC 576], Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of

Delhi) [(2024) 8 SCC 254] and Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana

and Another [2025 SCC Online SC 269], it has been held that the

requirement of informing a person of grounds for arrest is a mandatory

requirement of Article 22(1) and also that the said information must be

provided to the arrested person in such a manner that sufficient

knowledge of the basic facts constituting the grounds must be

communicated to the arrested person effectively in the language which

he understands.

8. In a recent decision in Shahina vs. State of Kerala [2025

KHC OnLine 706] this Court has also considered the impact of the B.A.NO. 8784 OF 2025

2025:KER:58413

aforesaid principles in relation to offences alleged under the NDPS Act

and held that the grounds for arrest must be communicated.

9. On a perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that the arrest

memo indicates that the petitioner was found to have been in

possession of 42.06 Kg of ganja kept for sale which can be treated as a

communication of the grounds for his arrest. However, in the arrest

notice as conveyed to petitioner's father there is nothing to indicate

that the grounds for arrest were communicated. In view of the above, I

am satisfied that the grounds for arrest have not been communicated

to the petitioner as contemplated by law.

10. Petitioner has been in custody from 05.10.2024, onwards.

Since the grounds for arrest were not communicated to the petitioner

soon after the arrest, petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

11. In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

B.A.NO. 8784 OF 2025

2025:KER:58413

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any

modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the

jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider such applications if

any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law,

notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

mea B.A.NO. 8784 OF 2025

2025:KER:58413

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8784/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT IN CRIME NO. 43 OF 2024 OF EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD, KOLLAM Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR IN CRIME NO. 43 OF 2024 OF EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD, KOLLAM Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 43 OF 2024 OF EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD, KOLLAM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter