Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8335 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2025
2025:KER:33286
O.P.(FC)No.268/2025
-:1:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. V. JAYAKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1947
OP (FC) NO. 268 OF 2025
IN OP NO.392 OF 2024 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN OP:
PRASAD V. PRABHAKARAN,
AGED 49 YEARS,
S/O V. PRABHAKARAN, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
GROVER LANE, NEAR S.N. JUNCTION,
TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682301
BY ADVS.P.G.JAYASHANKAR
PUSHPAVATHI.K
S.RAJEEV (K/001711/2019)
SAJANA V.H
SHAIJU GEORGE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN OP:
SHRIYA P. SRINIVAS,
AGED 47 YEARS,
D/O SIRINIVASAN, PAMBUKATTIL HOUSE,
POOLANI DESOM , MELOOR VILLAGE AND POST ,
CHALAKKUDI, PIN - 680311
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:33286
O.P.(FC)No.268/2025
-:2:-
JUDGMENT
G. GIRISH,J.
The petitioner is the father of an 11-year-old male child, aggrieved
by the non-consideration of Ext P3 application filed by him before the
Family Court, Irinjalakuda, for granting interim custody of the said child
to him. It is stated that the learned Judge of the Family Court,
Irinjalakuda, posted the above application to 02.09.2025 without paying
any heed to the fervent appeal of the petitioner to have custody of the
said child during the summer vacation.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought for by the
petitioner, we deem it appropriate to dispense with the issuance of notice
to the respondent.
4. The petitioner, being the biological father of the child, is fully
justified in seeking the interim custody of the child. However, the Family
Court concerned has to look into all the relevant aspects after interacting
with the child, and also considering the feasibility of granting overnight
custody of the child to the petitioner. All those aspects are left open to
be decided by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Irinjalakuda. But, 2025:KER:33286
it is imperative that the Family Court has to consider Ext P3 application
on merits, as expeditiously as possible and pass orders.
5. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this original
petition with the following direction:-
The Family Court, Irinjalakuda, is directed to consider Ext P3
application filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any
rate, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment, and to pass orders regarding the interim custody of the child,
after affording opportunity to both parties to advance arguments, and
also after interacting with the child.
Sd/-
G.GIRISH,JUDGE
Sd/-
K. V. JAYAKUMAR,JUDGE
DST/29.04.2025 2025:KER:33286
APPENDIX
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE OP NO. 392/2024 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALKAKUDA, FILED BY THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO. 2/2024 IN EXT P1 OP, ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 10/2025 IN GOP NO.
392/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER TO THE I.A 10/2025 IN G(OP) NO 392/2024 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!