Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nitheesh Krishna vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 8282 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8282 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2025

Kerala High Court

Nitheesh Krishna vs State Of Kerala on 25 April, 2025

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JOBIN SEBASTIAN

          FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 5TH VAISAKHA, 1947

                          BAIL APPL. NO. 5653 OF 2025

   CRIME NO.1708/2024 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA

         JUDGMENT DATED 24.10.2024 IN BAIL APPL. NO.8046 OF 2024 OF HIGH

                              COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:
            NITHEESH KRISHNA
            AGED 39 YEARS
            S/O K K VASU, CELESTIAL PHOENIX, RAMANCHIRA, MUTHOOR P.O,
            THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689107
             BY ADVS.
             APPU AJITH
             K.T.SIDHIQ
RESPONDENTS:
     1    STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          PIN - 682031

     2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION
             PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645


OTHER PRESENT:

             P.P. SRI. M.P. PRASANTH


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.04.2025,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BA 5653/2025
                                         -2-


                                                                       2025:KER:33130

                                   O R D E R

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. The petitioner herein is the sole accused in Crime

No.1708/2024 of Thiruvalla Police Station, Pathanamthitta,

registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC.

3. The prosecution allegation is that the accused,

with an intention to make unlawful gain to him and to make

unlawful loss to the defacto complainant, made to believe the

defacto complainant that he would arrange a job for the defacto

complainant in Singapore and obtained a total amount of

Rs.1,56,500/- from the defacto complainant. However, after

obtaining the said amount, the accused neither arranged a job nor

returned the amount received from the defacto complainant.

Moreover, the accused forged a fake visa. Hence, the accused is

alleged to have committed the offences mentioned above.

2025:KER:33130

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The allegation that the petitioner grabbed an

amount of more than Rs.1 lakh, under the pretext that he would

arrange a job visa for the defacto complainant, cannot be viewed

lightly. It is alleged that apart from grabbing the amount, the

petitioner had created some forged documents. Of course, an in-

depth investigation is highly necessary in this case to unearth the

entire details involved in this case and to find out the modus

operandi of the petitioner. Anyhow, the petitioner was arrested in

this case on 01.04.2025 and since then he has been in custody. As

the investigation in this case has progressed substantially, further

incarceration of the petitioner will serve no purpose.

6. Hence, considering the days of detention already

undergone by the petitioner and the stage of investigation, I am

inclined to grant bail to him on the following conditions:

2025:KER:33130

1. Petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees

One lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating

Officer on every Monday between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. for a

period of three months or until the final report is filed,

whichever occurs first.

3. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation

and shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,

threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of

the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to

the Court or to any police officer.

4. Petitioner shall not leave India without permission of

the jurisdictional Court.

5. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on

bail.

6. If the petitioner violates any of the above conditions,

2025:KER:33130

the investigating officer is at liberty to file an appropriate

application for cancellation of bail before the jurisdictional

court and if such an application is filed the jurisdictional

court can pass appropriate orders irrespective of the fact that

this order is passed by this Court.

Sd/-

JOBIN SEBASTIAN JUDGE JS

2025:KER:33130

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 5653/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR CRIME NUMBER 1708 OF 2024 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT DATED 11/11/2024

Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN BA 8064/2024 DATED 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024

Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN BA 3457/2025 DATED 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2025

Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL MP 3241/2025 DATED 11/04/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter