Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashin Surendran vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 7948 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7948 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2025

Kerala High Court

Ashin Surendran vs State Of Kerala on 11 April, 2025

Author: V.G.Arun
Bench: V.G.Arun
                                                      2025:KER:32292

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

     FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947

                      CRL.MC NO. 3407 OF 2025

        CRIME NO.176/2021 OF Panur Police Station, Kannur

       ORDER DATED 06.07.2024 IN CRMC NO.510 OF 2021 OF DISTRICT

                 COURT & SESSIONS COURT,THALASSERY

PETITIONER:

          ASHIN SURENDRAN
          AGED 25 YEARS
          S/O SURENDRAN, KALLULLAPARAMBATH HOUSE, PUTHOORAMSOM,
          KUTTYERI, K C MUKKU, PANOOR PO, THALASSERY TALUK,
          KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692


          BY ADVS.
          DEEPAK RAJ
          K.SUJITH MOHAN
          GOUTHAMI




RESPONDENT:

          STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031


          SRI. M.C. ASHI, PP.


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                               2025:KER:32292


Crl.M.C.No.3407 of 2025

                                         2


                                  ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of April, 2025

The challenge in this Crl.M.C is against

Annexure IV order, by which bail granted to the

petitioner in Crime No.176 of 2021 of Panur Police

Station as per Annexure II order, was cancelled. The

reason for cancellation of bail is petitioner's

involvement in a subsequent crime, regarding which

Crime No.180 of 2023 got registered at the Panur

Police Station.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends

that, mere involvement in a subsequent crime, that too

after ten months after enlargement on bail in the first

crime, cannot, by itself, be a reason for cancelling the

bail. In support of this argument, reliance is placed on

the decision of this Court in Ranjith v. State of 2025:KER:32292

Kerala (2023 (2) KLT 182) and that of the Apex Court

in Kailash Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

(2025 KHC OnLine 7157). Learned Counsel for the

petitioner submits that in Crime No.180 of 2023,

registration of which is the reason for cancelling the

petitioner's bail, final report was filed before the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery

and the case taken on file as C.C No.334 of 2023. The

trial in the case has commenced and PW1, the defacto

complainant, having turned hostile, the court decided

not to examine any other witnesses and posted the

case for judgment. It is therefore evident that the

petitioner will be acquitted in that case. It is pointed

out that the petitioner had appeared before the trial

court on 03.04.2025 and is remanded to custody.

3. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

2025:KER:32292

4. It is doubtful whether the petitioner's bail

could have been cancelled merely by reason of

registration of a second crime. The submission of the

learned Counsel that in the second crime the defacto

complainant turned hostile and without examining

other witnesses, the case is posted for judgment also

assumes relevance in this context.

5. Moreover, the order has resulted in the

petitioner undergoing incarceration from 03.04.2025

onwards. The above factors along with the decisions of

this Court in Ranjith (supra), holding that bail once

granted ought not be cancelled for the mere asking

and that of the Supreme Court in Kailash Kumar

(supra), reiterating the principle that liberty of an

individual, being a precious right under the 2025:KER:32292

Constitution, cannot be taken away lightly, persuades

me to allow the prayer.

In the result, the Crl.M.C is allowed.

Annexure IV order is quashed and Annexure II order,

granting bail to the petitioner, is restored.

Consequently, the petitioner is directed to be released

from custody immediately on production of a copy of

this order. Registry shall communicate a copy of this

order to the Superintendent of Sub Jail, Thalassery.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN JUDGE SSK/11/04 2025:KER:32292

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure I A TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 176/2021 OF PANOOR POLICE STATION. KANNUR DISTRICT, DATED 31/3/2021

Annexure II A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.04.2021 IN CRL.MC NO.510/2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT

Annexure III A TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 180/2023 OF PANOOR POLICE STATION, DATED 4/2/2023

Annexure IV A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.07.2024 IN CRL. M.P. NO: 29/2024 IN CRL.MC NO. 510/2021 OF SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter