Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nikhil vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 27009 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27009 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Nikhil vs State Of Kerala on 6 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                     2024:KER:68139

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

  FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 15TH BHADRA, 1946

                      CRL.MC NO. 7120 OF 2024

          CRIME NO.56/2015 OF Attingal Police Station,

                         Thiruvananthapuram

     AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.817 OF 2017 OF

SPECIAL    COURT-TRIAL   OF   OFFENCE   UNDER   SC/ST(POA)ACT1989,

NEDUMANGAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

             NIKHIL
             AGED 45 YEARS
             S/O NEELAKANDAN NAIR, PLAVILA VEEDU, MAMOM,
             CHITTATTINKARA, KIZHUVILAM VILLAGE, ATTINGAL,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695101


             BY ADV M.ABDUL RASHEED

RESPONDENT/STATE/DE-FACTO OCOMPLAINANT:

    1        STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2        STATION HOUSE OFFICER
             ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL P.O.,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,, PIN - 695101
 CRL.MC NO. 7120 OF 2024    2

                                                2024:KER:68139




    3     SAROJINI
          AGED 69 YEARS
          D/O SARADHA, PUTHENVEEDU, VALIYAKUNNU,
          CHITTATTINKARA, KIZHUVILAM VILLAGE,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695101


          BY ADVS.
          SRI. A.MUHAMMED HASHIM-R3
          SMT. SREEJA V (PP)



    THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 7120 OF 2024               3

                                                                          2024:KER:68139

                    BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                     .............................................
                       Crl.M.C. No. 7120 of 2024
                  .......................................................
               Dated this the 6th day of September, 2024

                                      ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, to quash all proceedings

against him.

2. Petitioner is the accused in S.C. No.817/2017 on the

files of the Special Court for Trial of Offence under SC/ST(POA) Act

Cases,1989, Nedumangad arising out of Crime No.56/2015 of Attingal

Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 427 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

read with Section 3(1)(XI)(XIV) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The third respondent is the

de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had

trespassed into the property of the de facto complainant and committe4d

mischief and called her by caste name, and thereby committed the

offences alleged.

2024:KER:68139

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering

the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by

continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012)

10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the

High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between

the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings.

This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of

Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and

Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-A3 affidavit filed by the third

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and de facto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

2024:KER:68139

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case.

There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in

S.C. No.817/2017 on the files of the Special Court for Trial of Offence

under SC/ST(POA) Act Cases,1989, Nedumangad , are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJ

2024:KER:68139

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.56/2015 OF ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT DATED 12.1.2015

ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 12.2.2016 IN S.C. NO.817/2017 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SC/ST (POA) ACT SPECIAL COURT, NEDUMANGAD ALONG WITH THE COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE, REPORT, STATEMENT OF THE WITNESSES, MAHAZAR

ANNEXURE A3 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT DATED 8.8.2024 SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter