Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.M.Majeed vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 29884 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29884 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.M.Majeed vs State Of Kerala on 22 October, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 8187 OF 2024            1


                                                     2024:KER:79788

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

     TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 30TH ASWINA, 1946

                       CRL.MC NO. 8187 OF 2024

        CRIME NO.188/2004 OF Atholy Police Station, Kozhikode

         AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN LP NO.52 OF 2014 OF

          JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - II, PERAMBRA

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 & 4:

    1      K.M.MAJEED
           AGED 51 YEARS
           S/O KALYANI AMMA, CHERUVATH HOUSE, ATHOLI AMSOM,
           KOLAKKAD DESOM, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673315

    2      SHYJU
           AGED 50 YEARS
           S/O CHANDRAN, NADUKKANDI MEETHAL VEEDU, KEEZHARIYOOR
           AMSOM,DESOM, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673307

           BY ADVS.
           SANTHARAM.P
           REKHA ARAVIND
           P.G.GOKULNATH



RESPONDENTS/STATE & INFORMANT:

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           PIN - 682031

    2      LINEESH KUMAR
           S/O MADHAVAN NAIR, CHENKUNIYINMEL HOUSE, KUNNATHARA,
           MODAKKALLUR P.O, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT,
           PIN - 673315
 CRL.MC NO. 8187 OF 2024          2


                                                    2024:KER:79788


          BY ADVS.
          SRI. PAUL P. ABRAHAM
          SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8187 OF 2024                  3


                                                                   2024:KER:79788

                      BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                   .............................................
                        Crl. MC No.8187 of 2024
                .......................................................
               Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2024
                                     ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash all proceedings

against him.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos.2 and 4 in L.P No.52/2014

on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Perambra,

arising out of Crime No.118/2004 of Atholy Police Station, Kozhikode,

registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860. The second respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

29.06.2004 collected Rs.1,50,000/- from the de facto complainant,

promising him to arrange visa and thereafter, failed to provide the visa

or return the amount collected from him, and thereby committed the

offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

2024:KER:79788

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering

the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing

the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

[(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases,

the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes

between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others

v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra

Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC

653].

7. I have perused Annexure 4 affidavit filed by the second

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and de facto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case.

There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

2024:KER:79788

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in

L.P No.52/2014 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,

Perambra, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJ

2024:KER:79788

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.188/2004 OF ATHOLI POLICE

Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF CHARGE IN CRIME NO.188/2004 OF ATHOLI POLICE

Annexure 3 A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 26.03.2012 IN C.C 13/2008 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, PERAMBRA

Annexure 4 AN AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY INFORMANT IN CRIME NO.188/2004 OF ATHOLI POLICE DATED 22.07.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter