Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Valsala Milk A.B vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 29122 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29122 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Valsala Milk A.B vs State Of Kerala on 10 October, 2024

Author: Anil K. Narendran

Bench: Anil K.Narendran

WA No.139/2022                           1/4

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                                         &
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
                                         &
                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
            Thursday, the 10th day of October 2024 / 18th Aswina, 1946
                                WA NO. 139 OF 2022
        AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 14/12/2021 IN WP(C) 857/2019 OF THIS COURT
   APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

          VALSALA MILKA.B., AGED 63,W/O.CHANDRAMOHAN, RESIDING AT POURNAMI, TC
          19/1981-1, POOJAPPURA,, THIRUMALA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 012.

    BY ADV.RAJESH P.NAIR

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

      1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER
         EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         PIN- 695 001.

    AND 5 OTHERS

    BY SMT.SABEENA P. ISMAIL(GOVERNMENT PLEADER)AND SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN(ADDL.
    ADVOCATE GENERAL) FOR R1 TO R4.

    SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY,STANDING COUNSEL FOR UGC(B/O)

        Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
   circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
   to direct the respondents to disburse the DCRG amount with interest to the
   petitioner forthwith,till the disposal of this Writ Appeal.

        This Writ Appeal again coming on for orders on 10/10/2024, upon
   perusing the appeal memorandum and this court's order dated 02/07/2024,
   the court on the same day passed the following:
 WA No.139/2022                             2/4




                 ANIL K. NARENDRAN, VIJU ABRAHAM & G. GIRISH, JJ.
                       ------------------------------------------------
                                    W.A.No.139 of 2022
                         ---------------------------------------------
                       Dated this the 10th day of October, 2024

                                         ORDER

Anil K. Narendran, J.

On 30.08.2024, the learned Standing Counsel for University

Grants Commission (UGC) has filed a statement dated 10.07.2024,

producing therewith Annexure R7(a) approval letter dated 08.03.2013

issued to the Principal, Government Law College, Cochin for the award

of Teacher Fellowship under the Faculty Development Programme - XIth

Plan period to a Teacher Fellow by name Anusree A., subject to the

condition that if the Teacher Fellow fails to complete her Ph.D/M.Phil

programme and leaves it midway, she has to refund the entire amount

paid to her by the UGC during her Teacher Fellowship. As per Annexure

R7(a), the Teacher Fellow is required to give an undertaking that she

will complete the research work within the allotted tenure/plan period,

failing which she will refund the fellowship grant, substitute teacher

salary to UGC-SWRO. The document marked as Annexure R7(b) is a

format for refund of grant-in-aid and interest, which is one issued in

respect of Government Law College, Ernakulam, where the reason for

refund is stated as non-submission of Ph.D Thesis within the stipulated

time.

2. During the course of arguments, the submission made by

the learned Standing Counsel for UGC is that the approval for the award

of Teacher Fellowship to the appellant under the Faculty Development

Programme during the IXth Plan period was based on a similar

communication issued by the UGC to the Principal of the 6th respondent

Christian College, Kattakkada, specifying the conditions for such

approval.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the

appellant is not having the copy of the approval letter issued by UGC.

4. The learned Additional Advocate General would submit that

the 2nd respondent Director of Collegiate Education shall make an

attempt to get a copy of the approval letter issued by the UGC for the

award of Faculty Improvement Programme to the appellant, from the

6th respondent Principal of Christian College, Kattakkada.

List this appeal for further arguments, on 07.11.2024 at 4.00 p.m.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE

Sd/-

G. GIRISH, JUDGE

AV/-

10-10-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

Annexure R(7)(a) True copy of one of the sanction letters issued during the 11th plan period to the Principal Govt Law College Ernakulam Annexure R(7)(b) True copy of the format if such a refund is made.

10-10-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter