Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33178 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2024
2024:KER:85828
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 42141 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
SANDHYA K.V
AGED 40 YEARS, D/O.LAKSHMI,
LAKSHMI NIVAS, AICHU P.O.,
KANNUR -670 591
BY ADVS.
O.V.MANIPRASAD
SRI.JOSE ANTONY
SRI.S.SHIV SHANKAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA DPI OFFICE,
THIRUANANTHAPURAM -695001.
3 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
KANNUR NORTH EDUCATIONA SUB DISTRICT,
KANNUR P.O., PIN- 670 001, KANNUR DISTRICT.
4 SUDHEER K.V.
S/O. LAKSHMI, AICHUR P.O.,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN- 670591.
5 SATHYAN K.V.
POOCHALI HOUSE, NANDANAM,
MISSION COMPOUND, CHOWWA P.O.,
KANNUR DISTRICT - 67000
2
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019
2024:KER:85828
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.P. ABDUL KAREEM
SRI.JUSTIN JACOB - SR.GP.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 15.11.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).3483/2019, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019
2024:KER:85828
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 3483 OF 2019
PETITIONERS:
1 SUDHEER.K.V,
LAKSHMI NIVAS, P.O EACHUR,
KANNUR DISTRICT 670 591.
2 SATHYAN K.V,
POOCHALI HOUSE, NANDANAM MISSION COMPOUND,
P.O CHOVVA, KANNUR DISTRICT 670 001.
BY ADV.
SRI.P.P. ABDUL KAREEM
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
KANNUR 670 001.
4 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
KANNUR NORTH, KANNUR DISTRICT 671 321.
5 SANDYA K.V,
UPSA, MADRASSA SIRAJUL ULOO, UP SCHOOL,
ANAYIDUK RESIDING AT C.P HOUSE,
PO KOTTALI, KANNUR DISTRICT 670 016.
BY ADVS.
SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD
SRI.JUSTIN JACOB - SR.GP
4
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019
2024:KER:85828
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 15.11.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).42141/2018, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
5
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019
2024:KER:85828
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
------------------------------
W.P.(C) Nos.42141 of 2018 and 3483 of 2019
------------------------------
Dated this the 15th day of November, 2024
JUDGMENT
The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 is the Manager
of an aided school, and the respondents 4 and 5 are her siblings.
The respondents 4 and 5 in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 are the
petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019.
2. The school concerned was originally under the
ownership and management of one Smt.K.V.Lakshmi, mother of
the petitioners in these writ petitions. It so happened that, when
the mother was alive, she had executed Ext.P1 settlement deed
(produced in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018), by settling the properties
wherein the school was situated as also the management of the
school in favour of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018. The
mother sought approval of the transfer as above pursuant to
Ext.P1 settlement deed. By Ext.P2 dated 25.09.2017, the Director
of Public Instructions approved the transfer as above, at the
request of the mother. The order at Ext.P3 is a consequential one
issued by the Assistant Educational Officer.
3. In such circumstances, the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
3483 of 2019 submitted objections before the Assistant
Educational Officer, and the said authority conducted enquiries in
the matter with notice to the mother also. It is noticed that the
mother has also appeared before the enquiry officer and gave
evidence in tune with Ext.P1 settlement deed. It is on that basis
that Ext.P2 was issued by the Director of Public Instructions.
4. The afore orders were challenged by the petitioners in
W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019. The Government issued Ext.P9 in
W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018, with reference to the revision petition
filed by the brothers. The Government came to the following
findings;
i. As regards the allegation that the petitioner in
W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 was a permanent
Government employee and hence not entitled to
be accommodated as the Manager, the
Government found that the petitioner in W.P.(C)
No.42141 of 2018 was only a daily wage employee
in an aided school and therefore, the embargo
pointed out by the siblings would not apply as
against her.
ii. However, the Government found that the siblings
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
- the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019 - had
raised some disputes by filing O.S.No.33 of 2018,
before the Civil Court and therefore, even if the
petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 can
continue to be in management of the school, she
shall not make any appointments in the school.
5. The findings in Ext.P9 order dated 14.11.2018, to the
extent, the reservations with reference to O.S.No.33 of 2018 were
incorporated, are challenged by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141
of 2018. The afore order in its entirety is challenged by the siblings
- petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019.
6. I have heard Sri.O.V.Maniprasad, the learned counsel
for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 / 5th respondent in
W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019, Sri.P.P.Abdul Kareem, the learned
counsel for the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019/
respondents 4 and 5 in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 and the learned
Government Pleader.
7. Two issues arise for consideration in these writ
petitions. The first one is with reference to the findings in Ext.P9
order, as regards the employment of the petitioner in W.P.(C)
No.42141 of 2018 in a daily wage capacity. Sri.Abdul Kareem
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
points out that the findings to that effect in Ext.P9 are incorrect
insofar as the petitioner therein has been subsequently absorbed
in the service pursuant to the orders issued in that regard. It is
seen that the District Educational Officer, Kannur, has issued an
order dated 21.02.2024, approving the appointment of the
petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2019 in the aided school
mentioned in Ext.P9 order. In the light of the afore, I am of the
opinion that the findings rendered in Ext.P9 in that regard require
reconsideration.
8. At this juncture, I notice that the petitioner in W.P.(C)
No.42141 of 2018 had filed an application way back in
25.07.2019, anticipating an approval of appointment and seeking
the benefit of exemption from the rigours of Rule 8 Chapter III of
Kerala Education Rules (KER), with reference to the power
available under Rule 3 Chapter I of KER. In such circumstances,
while reconsidering the issue with reference to the employment of
the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018, in my opinion, a
decision has to be taken on the application at Ext.P14 dated
25.07.2019 at first.
9. The second issue to be considered is with reference to
the rider in Ext.P9 with reference to O.S.No.33 of 2018 filed by
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
the siblings - petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019. May be, it is
true that such a suit is filed by the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483
of 2019. However, if the Government is deciding to permit the
petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018 to continue in the
management of the school, I find no reason why such a rider
should be incorporated in the order concerned. This is especially
so since it is seen that the suit was twice dismissed for default and
is stated to have been restored to the files of the Civil Court.
In such circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of
as under;
i. Ext.P9 order dated 14.11.2018 in both these writ
petitions are set aside.
ii. The Government is directed to take a decision on
Ext.P14 application dated 25.07.2019 filed by the
petitioner in W.P.(C) No.42141 of 2018, as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period
of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of
this judgment, with specific reference to the power
available to the Government under Chapter I Rule 3
of the KER.
iii. Upon disposal of Ext.P14 as above, the Government
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
to reconsider the revision appeal dated 21.05.2018
filed by petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3483 of 2019 with
an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a
further period of one month thereafter.
iv. It is declared that the Government is not to
incorporate any riders with reference to the pendency
of O.S.No.33 of 2018, even if any order is being
passed by the Government in this regard.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE anm
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 42141/2018
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE OCPY OF THE REGISTREED SETTLEMENT DEED NO. 3215/2015 OF SRO, ANCHARAKANDY DATED 26.12.2015.
EXHIBIT P2 ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2017 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.11.2017 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY FO THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON 04.07.2016 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY FO THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT ON 21.06.2016 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 ATRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION SUBMITTED BY THE MOTHER OF THE PETITINER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 10.08.2016.
EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEL DATED 21.05.2018 BY THE RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 ATRUE COPY FO THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.06.2018 IN WPC NO. 20723/2018.
EXHIBIT P9 ATRUE COPY FO THE GO.(RT) NO. 4756/18/ G.EDN DATED 14.11.2018.
EXHIBIT P10 A TRUE COPY FO THE PLAINT, O.S. 33/2018 OF THE SUB COURT, KANNUR Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4/7/2022 IN O.S NO.33/2018 OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT, KANNUR WITH LEGIBLE COPY Exhibit P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27/6/2022 SUBMITTED BY THE P.T.A COMMITTEE.
Exhibit P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.07.2024 IN O.S NO.33/2018 OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT, KANNUR Exhibit P14 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 25.07.2019
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
Exhibit P15 A TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DATED 25.07.2019 SIGNED BY THE MANAGER, MADRASSA SIRAJUL ULOOM UP SCHOOL, ANAYIDUK, KANNUR Exhibit P16 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P17 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.09.2024 WITH NO. F2/181/2022/GEN.EDN Exhibit P18 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.02.2024 OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR
W.P.(C)Nos.42141 of 2018 & 3483 of 2019 2024:KER:85828
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3483/2019
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 9/6/2016 SUBMITTED BY SMT. LAKSHMI K.V. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 4/7/2016 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 4/7/2016 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF MANAGEMENT IN FORM NO. 10 ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 24/6/2017.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
G4/14939/2017/DPI/K.DIS DATED 25/9/2017 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. K.DIS 3/1855/16 DATED 13/11/2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION APPEAL DATED 21/5/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22/6/2018
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14/11/2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
DEOKNR/1669/2023-B2 DATED 21/02/2024 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R5(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE GIFT DEED DATED 26/12/2015 OF SRO, ANCHARAKANDY.
EXHIBIT R5(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEED DATED 30/3/1999
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!