Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Mahashooq K.B vs Manager, Esaf Small Finance Bank
2024 Latest Caselaw 14550 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14550 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Abdul Mahashooq K.B vs Manager, Esaf Small Finance Bank on 31 May, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
        FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 10485 OF 2024


PETITIONER:

            ABDUL MAHASHOOQ K.B
            AGED 30 YEARS
            SHIHAB MANZIL, KULANGARA,
            KUDLU, KASARAGOD,
            PIN - 671124

            BY ADV NAJAH EBRAHIM V.P.



RESPONDENTS:

    1       MANAGER, ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK
            ESAF SFB, NEW STYLO COMPLEX,
            BANK ROAD, KASARAGOD,
            PIN - 671121

    2       POLICE INSPECTOR,
            VASAI VIRAR POLICE COMMISSSIONER
            VASAI VIRAR, BHAYANDAR DIST.,
            MAHARASHTRA, PIN - 401303

            BY ADV B.S.SURESH KUMAR




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 10485 OF 2024
                                      2



                             T.R. RAVI, J.
              --------------------------------------------
                      W.P.(C). No.10485 of 2024
               --------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of accounts with the 1 st respondent

Bank and his account has been frozen on intimation by Police

Authorities. The Court had at the time of admission, issued interim

directions to restrict the freezing of the account to the amount which

had been subject matter of the dispute as per the intimation

received from the Police authorities. However, it is seen that the

notice to the Bank does not mention the disputed amount, and seeks

a complete debit freeze of all the amounts in credit. In such

circumstances, following the decision in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank

of India [ 2023 KHC OnLine 661], this writ petition is disposed of

with the following directions;

(a) The respondent Bank is directed to immediately issue a request to the Investigation Authority/Police Authority and seek the amount which is required to be kept in freeze or held in lien in the account of the petitioner. This shall be done by the Bank within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. WP(C) NO. 10485 OF 2024

(b) In the event that the Investigating Officer/Police Authority responds to the afore requisition and mentions a particular amount, as being the sum that is required to be kept frozen or held in lien, then the respondent Bank will confine the freeze/lien to such an extent and allow the petitioner/account holder to deal with his account and transact therein beyond that limit.



           (c)     On the contrary, if no information is
           received              from              the           Police

Authority/Investigating officer within a period of two months from the date on which the afore requisition was made by the respondent Bank, then they will allow the petitioner/account holder to transact fully in his account, notwithstanding the debit freeze requisition, subject to any further information to be received from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer in future.

(d) As an alternative, if the response from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer is that the entire account be frozen for any reason that is mentioned therein, then the Bank will inform the petitioner/account holder accordingly and continue the freeze in such a manner for a further period of eight months thereafter.

WP(C) NO. 10485 OF 2024

(e) If, after a period of eight months, the requisition made by the Police Authorities - either to a particular sum or the full amount in the account of the account holder - is not withdrawn, then the petitioner/account holder will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; which purpose, all contentions in this writ petition are reserved to him to be impelled in future.

Sd/-/-

T.R. RAVI JUDGE

Pn WP(C) NO. 10485 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10485/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 02.01.2024 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER, ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK, KASARAGOD BRANCH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter