Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dream Plywood,Represented By Muhammed ... vs Icici Bank, Perumbavoor Branch (Rep ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 13839 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13839 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Dream Plywood,Represented By Muhammed ... vs Icici Bank, Perumbavoor Branch (Rep ... on 28 May, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
        TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 12407 OF 2024


PETITIONER:

            DREAM PLYWOOD,
            REPRESENTED BY MUHAMMED GUDHAFI
            AGED 27 YEARS
            PALATHINGAL, MUDICKAL P.O,
            PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683547

            BY ADVS.
            IPSITA OJAL
            MANAS P HAMEED
            MARIYAMMA A.K.
            AISHWARYA SHIVAKUMAR



RESPONDENTS:

    1       ICICI BANK, PERUMBAVOOR BRANCH
            (REP THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER)
            PLAVADA BUILDING, A M ROAD,
            ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683542

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            MAHARASHTRA BRIHAN MUMBAI CITY CYBER POLICE STATION,
            BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI, PIN - 400051

            BY ADVS.
            SHAHIER SINGH M.
            SHARAN SHAHIER(K/1202/2010)




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 12407 OF 2024
                                        2



                                T.R. RAVI, J.
                 --------------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C). No.12407 of 2024
                  --------------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024

                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of accounts with the 1 st respondent

Bank and their account has been frozen on intimation by Police

Authorities. The Court had at the time of admission, issued interim

directions to restrict the freezing of the account to the amount which

had been subject matter of the dispute as per the intimation received

from the Police authorities. However, it is seen that the notice to the

Bank does not mention the disputed amount, and seeks a complete

debit freeze of all the amounts in credit. In such circumstances,

following the decision in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2023

KHC OnLine 661], this writ petition is disposed of with the following

directions;

(a) The respondent Bank is directed to immediately issue a request to the Investigation Authority/Police Authority and seek the amount which is required to be kept in freeze or held in lien in the account of the petitioner. This shall be done by the Bank within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

WP(C) NO. 12407 OF 2024

(b) In the event that the Investigating Officer/Police Authority responds to the afore requisition and mentions a particular amount, as being the sum that is required to be kept frozen or held in lien, then the respondent Bank will confine the freeze/lien to such an extent and allow the petitioner/account holder to deal with his account and transact therein beyond that limit.

(c) On the contrary, if no information is received from the Police Authority/Investigating officer within a period of two months from the date on which the afore requisition was made by the respondent Bank, then they will allow the petitioner/account holder to transact fully in his account, notwithstanding the debit freeze requisition, subject to any further information to be received from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer in future.

(d) As an alternative, if the response from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer is that the entire account be frozen for any reason that is mentioned therein, then the Bank will inform the petitioner/account holder accordingly and continue the freeze in such a manner for a further period of eight months thereafter.

(e) If, after a period of eight months, the WP(C) NO. 12407 OF 2024

requisition made by the Police Authorities - either to a particular sum or the full amount in the account of the account holder - is not withdrawn, then the petitioner/account holder will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; which purpose, all contentions in this writ petition are reserved to him to be impelled in future.

Sd/-/-

T.R. RAVI JUDGE

Pn WP(C) NO. 12407 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12407/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S BANK PASSBOOK IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P1.

Exhibit 2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION MARKING LIEN OF RS. 600,000/- ISSUED BY CITY CYBER POLICE STATION, WEST REGION, BRIHAN MUMBAI ISSUED ON 13/02/2024 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P2.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter