Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mariyumma Sulthan vs The Authorised Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 13779 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13779 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Mariyumma Sulthan vs The Authorised Officer on 28 May, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
 TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                WP(C) NO. 40658 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:

    1    MARIYUMMA SULTHAN,
         AGED 54 YEARS
         W/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN,
         VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THOTTAKATTUKARA P.O,
         ALUVA ,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 108.
    2    FATHIMATHU SUHARA K.Y,
         AGED 27 YEARS
         D/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN,
         VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THOTTAKATTUKARA P.O,
         ALUVA ,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 108.
    3    LAILA BEEVI V.Y.,
         AGED 25 YEARS
         D/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN,
         VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THOTTAKATTUKARA P.O,
         ALUVA ,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 108.

         BY ADVS.
         C.P.SAJI
         AHALYA PRAKASH K.V.

RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,
         M/S PIRAMAL CAPITAL & HOUSING FINANCE LTD.
         FORMELY KNOWN AS DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE
         CORPORATION LTD. 1ST FLOOR, K.M.M BUILDING,
         NEAR RENAI HOTELS, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI,
         PIN - 682025
    2    UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
         KALAMASSERY BRANCH, GROUND FLOOR, PALLATH
         TOWER, ELOOR ROAD, KALAMASSERY, PIN - 683104.
         REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
    3    JAMEELA SULTHAN
         W/O. LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
         VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
         VILLAGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 102.
 W.P.(C) No.40658 of 2022
                             :2:


    4      NIZAMUDHEEN K.Y
           S/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
           VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
           VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM., PIN - 683 102.
    5      HAYARUNNISSA ABDUL RAZAK
           D/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
           VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
           VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 102.
    6      AHMMED KABEER
           S/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
           VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
           VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 102.
    7      SHAHIRA SHIHAB
           D/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
           VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
           VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 102.
    8      SHAMSUDEEN V.Y
           S/O LATE AL HAJ SHEIK YOUSAF SULTHAN
           VENNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DESOM P.O. CHENGAMANAD
           VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM., PIN - 683 102.

           BY ADVS.
           DENU JOSEPH
           RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN
           K.MOHAMMED RAFEEQ
           P.DEEPTHI
           V.R.RAJESH(K/257/2008)
           K.K.AJI KUMAR(K/2139-C/1999)
           T.S.HARIKUMAR(K/782/1989)


    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.40658 of 2022
                                  :3:




                            JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024

The petitioners have approached this Court

seeking to direct the 1st respondent to attach and adjust the

amount due to the borrower late Al Haj Sheikh Yousuf Sultan

from his insurance amount due from the 2 nd respondent as

per Ext.P2 notice.

2. The petitioners are the second wife and daughters

of the borrower. Now, the Authorized Officer of the 1 st

respondent Finance Company has filed Ext.P1 petition for

taking physical possession of the secured asset scheduled

therein, where the petitioners are residing. The deceased

borrower owed debt to the 1st respondent. The borrower is

immensely rich and he is entitled to receive more than the

amount of liability due to the 1 st respondent from the 2nd

respondent-Insurer. This amount can be attached and

adjusted towards the liability.

3. The first wife of the borrower and his children are

not cooperating with the petitioners for receiving the amount

due from the 2nd respondent and to settle the liabilities of the

borrower. They are not residing in the secured asset.

Hence, they are not interested in settling the liabilities of late

Al Haj Sheikh Yousuf Sultan. The petitioners, therefore,

pray that the 1st respondent be directed to recover the

amount due from late Al Haj Sheikh Yousuf Sultan under

One Time Settlement Scheme from the insurance amount

due to him from the 2 nd respondent and to direct the 2 nd

respondent to release the amount sufficient to settle the

claim of the 1st respondent against late Al Haj Sheikh Yousuf

Sultan from his insurance amount.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the respective counsel representing

respondents 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8.

5. It is not disputed that a partition suit among the

legal heirs of Al Haj Sheikh Yousuf Sultan is pending

consideration before the Sub Court, North Paravur as

O.S.No. 77 of 2020. It is also not disputed that the insurance

claim in question is included in the schedule of the said

plaint. Therefore, it will only be appropriate that the matter is

decided finally by the Civil Court.

6. Going through the pleadings, I find that the Bank

has a claim against the deceased. The deceased was

guarantor to a loan transaction taken by an incorporated

company of which the deceased was one of the Directors.

Therefore, if the Bank wants early disbursal of the amount

out of the insurance claim payable by the 2 nd respondent, it

would be only appropriate for the 1st respondent to seek

appropriate relief from the Civil Court where the Suit is

pending

7. The writ petition is therefore disposed of permitting

the 1st respondent to get itself impleaded as additional

respondent in O.S. No. 77 of 2020 pending before the Sub

Court, North Paravur for claiming the amounts due to them

from the deceased. The parties to this writ petition will be at

liberty to raise all their contentions and legal arguments

before the Civil Court.

The counsel for the 1 st respondent submits that the

amount payable by the Insurance Company may be kept in

an interest bearing Fixed Deposit either with the petitioner's

Bank or in any other nationalized Bank. The counsel for the

6th respondent pointed out that there is a petition pending

before the Civil Court seeking to deposit the amount in the

Court. In view of the said petition, it would be only

appropriate that the 1st respondent makes this request to the

Civil Court itself for this purpose through appropriate

application.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE AJ

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40658/2022

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE PETITION FILED AS M.C. NO. 535/2022 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE'S COURT ERNAKULUM AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND OTHER LEGAL HEIRS AND CO- BORROWERS Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 10.05.2019

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter