Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13462 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(CRL.) NO. 504 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
HUSSAIN
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O.UMMER KUTTY, KAVIL THEKKETHIL HOUSE,
ZERO LAND COLONY, VALANJAVATTOM, PULIKEEZHU P.O,
KADAPPRA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689110
BY ADVS.
AJITH MURALI
SWAPNA VIJAYAN
MOHANAN M.K.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
2 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT , GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
PIN - 689645
4 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
5 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
PATHANAMTHITTA., PIN - 689645
6 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA,
PIN - 689101
WP(Crl.)No.504 of 2024
2
7 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
THIRUVALLA , PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
PIN - 689101
8 THE SUPERINTENDENT
CENTRAL PRISON, POOJAPURA,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 695012
BY SRI.K.A.ANAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 24.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl.)No.504 of 2024
3
JUDGMENT
S.Manu, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court
aggrieved by the detention of his son Anvar Hussain
pursuant to Ext.P1 order. The detenu has been detained
invoking the provisions of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities
(Prevention) Act, 2007 (KAAPA). The detention order was
issued on 02.04.2024 and the detenu has been detained
from the date of order.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the last prejudicial activity attributed against
the detenu was on 02.11.2023 and the order of detention
was issued on 02.04.2024. The precise contention raised
is that there is unreasonable delay between the last
prejudicial activity and the date of detention. Therefore,
the submission is that the delay has resulted in snapping
the live-link between the prejudicial activity and the
decision to invoke the provisions of the KAAPA against the
detenu is bad.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor
appearing for the respondents. We have also perused
Ext.P1 order which is under challenge in this writ petition.
4. We do not find any reason given in the
impugned order for the time gap of about 5 months
between the last prejudicial activity and the issuance of
the order of detention. No argument has been advanced
to justify the same. Therefore, we find merit in the
contention raised by the petitioner. We hence set aside
Ext.P1 order. The detenu shall be released forthwith, if
his custody is not required in any other proceedings. The
order shall be communicated immediately to the
Superintendent of the Central Prison concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Sd/-
S.MANU, JUDGE rkj
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 504/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DETENTION ORDER NO.DCPTA /1108/2024-B3 DATED 02.04.2024 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AGAINST THE DETENUE.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!