Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13293 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024
WP(C) NO. 25237 OF 2016 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 25237 OF 2016
PETITIONER/S:
SREE PERIYA THRIKKANAND VANNATHAN THARAVAD UDAHARANA
COMMITTEE
PERIYA (P.O) KASARGOD DISTRICT-PIN-671316.REPRESENTED
BY ITS SECRETARY V. RAMACHANDRAN.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.R.RAVI
SMT.CISSY MATHEWS
SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE
SRI.V.VINAY MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CIVIL STATION, VIDYANAGAR (PO)KASARAGOD.PIN-671123.
2 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LAND ASSIGNMENT
MINI CIVIL STATION COMPLEX,HOSDURG,KANHANGAD PO,
KASARAGOD, PIN-671315.
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 25237 OF 2016 2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C.) No. 25237 of 2016
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue appropriate orders in accordance with law, in passing appropriate orders on Exhibit P3 application, within a period to be determined by this Hon'ble Court notwithstanding Exhibit P5 communication. ii. Declare that the petitioner is having more preferential right, in the matter of assignment of 24 ½ cents of land in resurvey number 200 in Periya Village.
iii. Grant such other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary, in the facts and circumstances of the case." [sic]
2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue
direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 application
within a time frame. The Government Pleader after getting
instructions, submitted that no such application is received. If
that is the case, this writ petition need not be retained here. The
petitioner is free to file fresh application before the competent
authority among the respondents. If such an application is filed,
the competent authority will do the needful, in accordance with
law.
With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed
of.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25237/2016
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1 TRUE COPYOF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 15.7.1992 OF THE PETITIONER SOCIETY ISSUED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COY OF THE DECISION DATED 9.8.1992 OF THE PETTIIONER SOCIETY (RELEVENT PORTION)
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 11.8.1992 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 10.9.2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO TEH HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20.11.2004 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE ASSIGNED.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!