Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akhil Mohan vs The Fertilisers And Chemicals ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 13004 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13004 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Akhil Mohan vs The Fertilisers And Chemicals ... on 23 May, 2024

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
        THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

            AKHIL MOHAN
            AGED 26 YEARS
            S/O. MOHAN,MYAPALLIL, MEVELLOOR P.O., VELLOOR,
            ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 686609
            BY ADVS.
            K.T.THOMAS
            NIKHIL BERNY


RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.
            ELOOR, UDYOGAMANDAL REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.,
            PIN - 683501
    2       THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
            THE FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.,ELOOR,
            UDYOGAMANDAL, PIN - 683501
    3       THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
            THE FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.,ELOOR,
            UDYOGAMANDAL, PIN - 683501
     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

                                   2


                             JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner applied for the post of Craftsman (Electrical) in

answer to the Notification issued by the 1st respondent. He was

selected and included in the Merit list as Rank No.4 and he

was issued with the Appointment letter to join the duty on

25/03/2024. But after undergoing Pre-Employment Medical

Examination, petitioner received Ext.P6 Communication through

e-mail stating that he is medically unfit for the post. Ext. P6

does not reveal the ground on which he was found unfit for

the post. Petitioner states that on enquiry, he understood that

he was medically disqualified on the ground that he is having

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The contention of the petitioner is

that he is only 26 years old; that he has no history of diabetes;

that he underwent two lab tests in two different Labs and the

Reports are Ext.P5, dated 23/03/2024 and Ext.P7 dated WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

04/05/2024; and that as per Ext.P5 Report, his HbA1C is 6.0%

and as per Ext.P7 HbA1C is 5.6%. Hence, the petitioner filed

this writ petition praying for a direction to quash Ext.P6

communication issued by the 1st respondent and seeking further

direction to the respondents to obtain report on Diabetes

Mellitus of the petitioner from the Medical Board provided

under FACT Pr-Employment Medical Examination procedure

based on fresh medical test and act upon the same thereafter.

2. When the Writ petition came up for admission on

21/05/2024, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent

took notice and this Court directed the Standing Counsel to

ascertain the reason for finding the petitioner unfit for the post

and if it is on the basis of Diabetes as contended by the

petitioner, to make available the Lab Report with respect to the

same. Today when the matter came up for consideration, the WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

learned Standing Counsel for the respondents made available

the Report dated 18/03/2024 in which the HbA1C of the

petitioner is recorded as 6.6%. Another Lab Report dated

17/03/2024 issued by the St. Josephs Hospital, Manjummal is

also annexed in which the HbA1C of the petitioner is recorded

as 7.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents opposed

the prayers in the writ petition on the ground that there is an

effective alternative remedy by was of appeal available against

the decision of Medical Head under clause 11 of Ext.P4/ Pre-

Employment Medical Examination Procedure to the Chairman

and Managing Director of the 1st respondent for examination by

the Medical Board and hence the petitioner could have filed

Appeal against the decision of the Medical Head.

4. The Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

was not served with the copy of the report disclosing the

reason for medical unfitness and even by Ext.P6

communication, the reason for medical unfitness is revealed and

hence he is handicapped from filing appeal before the

Chairman and Managing Director of the respondent No.1.

5. I am of the view that the respondents can not find fault

with the petitioner for not invoking the aforesaid appellate

remedy when the reason for medical unfitness is not disclosed

to him.

6. But, since, the petitioner is now furnished with the reason

for his medical unfitness, he can very well invoke the appellate

remedy under Clause 11 of Ext.P4 before the Chairman and

Managing Director of the 1st respondent with supporting

documents including Exts.P5 and P7 for contradicting the report

obtained by the 1st respondent.

WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

7. I find from Clause 6.1.9(iii) of Ext.P4 that, if the diabetes

level is found abnormal, the candidate should be subjected to

detailed evaluation by a Medial Specialist. So, in any case, a

single lab test is not sufficient to hold that the petitioner is

medically unfit for the employment. The 1st respondent is liable

to conduct detailed evaluation as provided in Clause 6.1.9(iii)

of Ext.P4.

8. Accordingly, I dispose this writ petition by directing the

petitioner to file Appeal invoking clause 11.1 of Ext.P4/Pre-

Employment Medical Examination Procedure by producing the

supporting documents within a period of one week from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and further directing

the Chairman and Managing Director of the 1 st respondent to

take appropriate action on the said appeal and to dispose of

the same within a further period of one month. WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

9. Since the petitioner is made out a prima facie case, I deem

it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to keep one post of

Draftsman (Electrical) notified by the 1 st respondent vacant till

the Chairman and Managing Director takes a decision in the

matter as aforesaid.

The Writ Petition is disposed as above.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms WP(C) NO. 18098 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18098/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECRUITMENT NOTIFICATION NO.04/2023 DATED 19.04.2023 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MERIT LIST OF CANDIDATES FOR SELECTION TO THE POST OF TECHNICIAN (PROCESS) DATED 28.09.2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT DATED 15.03.2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FACT PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LAB REPORT DATED 23.03.2024 ISSUED BY VAIKOM TALUK URBAN WELFARE KISCO DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE, VAIKOM Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 25.03.2024 ISSUED BY THE COMPANY Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LAB REPORT DATED 04.05.2024 ISSUED BY RENAI MEDICITY, PALARIVATTOM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter