Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Babu.K.S vs The Special Sale Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 8996 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8996 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2024

Kerala High Court

Babu.K.S vs The Special Sale Officer on 27 March, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
    WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

          BABU.K.S, AGED 59 YEARS,
          S/O SREEDHARAN, KOOTTALA HOUSE,
          JANATHA ROAD, KURIACHIRA.P.O,
          THRISSUR DT,, PIN - 680027.

          BY ADVS.
          FRANKLIN ARACKAL
          NEETHU SOMAN
          I.J.AUGUSTINE


RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER
          MOOSPET SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.682
          OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF
          CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, AYYANTHOL, THRISSUR,
          PIN - 680003.

    2     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO OPERATIVE
          SOCIETIES, AYYANTHOL, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003.

    3     MOOSPET SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
          NO.682, MOOSPET ROAD, THRISSUR DT
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 680005.

          BY ADVS.
          SAJU S
          A.V.SAJAN(K/384/2001)
          SWETHA.S.(K/000571/2022)
          SAHDHA K.U.(K/1330/2024)
          SMT.C.S.SHEEJA, SR.GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024
                                 -2-

                           JUDGMENT

The limited plea of the petitioner is

that the 2nd respondent - Assistant Registrar

- who is also the competent Arbitrator, be

directed to take up Ext.P2 application filed

by him to set aside the alleged ex parte

Award in ARC No.1475/2022, along with Ext.P3

application filed to condone the delay in

filing such petition; with a corollary plea

that the said respondent be directed to keep

in abeyance all further proceedings in

E.P.No.81/2023, pending such exercise.

2. In response to the afore request of

the petitioner, as made by his learned

counsel - Sri.Franklin Arackal A.R., the

learned Senior Government Pleader -

Smt.C.S.Sheeja, submitted that the petitioner WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024

has not produced the Award on record; and

therefore, that it is not discernible whether

it is an ex parte one. She added that this is

crucial because, otherwise, Ext.P2 may not be

maintainable; but conceded that this is an

issue that can be considered by the 2nd

respondent appositely. She, however, prayed

that this Court may not make any affirmative

declarations in favour of the petitioner, or

as regards the maintainability of Ext.P2 and

leave it to be decided by the 2nd respondent;

but fix a very short time frame for such

purpose.

3. Sri.S.Siju - learned counsel for

respondent No.3, adopted the afore

submissions of the learned Senior Government

Pleader.

In the afore circumstances, without WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024

entering into the merits of any of the rival

contentions, I allow this Writ Petition to

the limited extent of directing the 2nd

respondent to take up Ext.P2 application,

along with Ext.P3, and dispose of the same,

after hearing both sides, as expeditiously as

is possible, but not later than one month

from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

Needless to say, since this Court has not

decided the question whether Ext.P2 is

maintainable, this will also be considered by

the 2nd respondent, while the afore exercise

is completed and his opinion shall be

reflected in the resultant order.

Finally, until such time as the afore

exercise is completed and the resultant order

communicated to the petitioner, recovery WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024

action against him, based on E.P.No.81/2023

in ARC No.1475/2022, will stand deferred; but

clarifying that it can be thereafter taken

forward, depending upon the decision to be

taken by the 2nd respondent through the afore

exercise.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv WP(C) NO. 7036 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7036/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE DATED 15/1/2024 SERVED ON THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE UNNUMBERED IA IN ARC NO.1475/2022 DATED 15/2/2024 TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE ORDER

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE UNNUMBERED IA IN ARC NO.1475/2022 DATED 15/2/2024 TO CONDONE THE DELAY IN FILING EXHIBIT P2 IA

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 20/2/2024 EVIDENCING THE DISPATCH OF EXHIBIT P2 AND EXHIBIT P3 IA'S TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/1/2024 IN WP(C)2235/2024 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter