Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harshad A.R vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 15701 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15701 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Harshad A.R vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
     THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 18142 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
           HARSHAD A.R
           AGED 21 YEARS
           S/O RASHEED A.H,ANJILAKADAVATH HOUSE, KADANGOD
           P.O,TRISSSUR, PIN - 680584

          BY ADVS.
          NESAMUDHEEN
          E.ADITHYAN
          SAFA C.M.


RESPONDENTS:

    1     UNION OF INDIA
          MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME
          SECRETARY NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001

    2     STATE OF KERALA
          REP BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,, PIN - 682031

    3     STATE BANK OF INDIA
          THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER ERUMAPETTY BRANCH, AL-HIDAYA
          COMPLEX, TRISSURE EMAIL: [email protected], PIN -
          680584

    4     THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          SHOSADARTSR POLICE STATION, THANESAR SADAR,
          KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA EMAIL -
          [email protected], PIN - 136131

    5     STATE POLICE CHIEF HARYANA
          POLICE HEADQUARTER, SECTOR-6, CITY-PANCHKULA, HARYANA,
          PIN - 134109

          SRI.V.GIRISH KUMAR, CGC
          SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP
          SRI.JITHESH MENON, SC
          SRI.P.NARAYANAN, SPL. G.P. TO DGP AND ADDL. P.P. ()


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 18142 OF 2024                 2

                             T.R. RAVI, J.
             --------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C)No.18142 of 2024
                 --------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a holder of an account with the

respondents Bank and his account has been frozen on

intimation by Police Authorities. The Court had, at the time of

admission, issued interim directions to restrict the freezing of

the accounts to the amount which had been subject matter of

the dispute, as per the intimation received from the Police

authorities. The Bank has also taken action to that extent

pursuant to the directions issued by this Court. In similar

cases, this Court had after issuance of such interlocutory

orders, closed the writ petitions with certain directions.

Paragraph No.12 of the directions issued in Dr.Sajeer v.

Reserve Bank of India [ 2023 KHC OnLine 661] is

extracted hereunder;

"12. In fact, should the criminal enquiry found otherwise, it will be doubtful if the amounts in question could be even recovered from the petitioners, if they have received it as part of bonafide or other valid transactions, unaware of

it being proceeds of crime.

In the conspectus of the above, I order these Writ Petitions with the following directions:

a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts of the respective petitioners, only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This shall be done forthwith, so as to enable the petitioners to deal with their accounts, and transact therein, beyond that limit.

b. The respondent - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the respective Banks as to whether freezing of accounts of the petitioners in these Writ Petitions will require to be continued even in the afore manner; and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

c. On the Banks receiving the afore information/intimation from the Police Authorities, they will adhere with it and complete necessary action - either continuing the freeze for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

d. If, however, no information or intimation is received by their Banks in terms of directions (b) above, the petitioners or such among them, will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for which purpose, all their contentions in these Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to them, to impel in future."

This writ petition is disposed of with the above said

directions.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE LEK

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18142/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF EMAIL DATED 17/10/2023 RECEIVED FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.11.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BANK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter