Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Desai Papers vs Jose Immanuel
2024 Latest Caselaw 5457 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5457 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

M/S. Desai Papers vs Jose Immanuel on 16 February, 2024

Author: K.Babu

Bench: K. Babu

Crl.A No.141 of 2023                 1



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
    FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945
                             CRL.A NO. 141 OF 2023
 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 4471/2017 OF JMFC (NI ACT CASES),
                                  ERNAKULAM


APPELLANT:

             M/S. DESAI PAPERS
             67/9631 A5, FIRST FLOOR, D.D. VASTRA MAHAL, MARKET
             ROAD, KOCHI-682011 REPRESENTED BY IT'S POWER OF
             ATTORNEY HOLDER AND SENIOR MANGER MR. JINU GEORGE,
             S/O LATE M V GEORGE, AGED 46, D D VASTHRAMAHAL,
             MARKET ROAD, COCHIN, PIN - 682011
             BY ADV SHIJU VARGHESE
RESPONDENTS:

      1       JOSE IMMANUEL
              CHERRY'S PRINTERS, L.F.C. ROAD,
              KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682017
      2       STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
              BY ADVS.
              Julian Xavier.J Joseph
              FIROZ K.ROBIN(F-15)
              ROY JOSEPH(K/55/2006)
              ANIES MATHEW(K/952/2007)
              ANJANA RAM(K/000695/2020)
              NIRMAL KURIEN EAPEN(K/000151/2022)
              R1 BY SRI.G.SUDHEER-PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


       THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.A No.141 of 2023                     2


                                      K.BABU, J
                       -------------------------------------------------
                               Crl.A No.141 of 2023
                       --------------------------------------------------
                        Dated this the 16th day of February, 2024

                                   J U D G M E N T

The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 18.6.2022,

acquitting the accused, in C.C.No.4471/2017 passed by the Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court (N.I Act Cases), Ernakulam under Section 256(1)

of Cr.P.C.

2. The appellant is the complainant. The complainant filed a

complaint against the accused alleging the offence punishable under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court (N.I Act Cases), Ernakulam. The complainant

alleged that the accused executed two cheques for Rs.1,00,000/-. The

complainant presented the cheques for encashment. The cheques were

dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds. The complainant caused to

issue lawyer's notice. The accused received the notice, but refused to pay

the amount covered by the cheques.

3. The complainant filed the complaint before the jurisdictional

Magistrate on 8.11.2017. The Court took cognizance of the offence and

issued summons to the accused. On 16.3.2022 the accused appeared. On

18.6.2022 as the complainant was not represented, the learned Magistrate

acquitted the accused under Section 256 of Cr.P.C.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and

the learned counsel appearing for the accused.

5. The learned counsel for the complainant submitted that the

complainant remained absent only on 18.6.2022 and he has been

diligently prosecuting the case since 2017. It is further submitted that the

complainant was affected with viral fever and underwent RTPCR test and

he had submitted an application seeking exemption before the Court. It is

further submitted that the complainant tested positive for Covid-19 and

he was incapacitated to appear before the Court on 18.6.2022.

6. I have gone through the proceedings of the Trial Court. The

complainant filed a complaint in 2017. The case stood adjourned on

different occasions by notifications and it was after five years the

presence of the accused was procured. The proceeding paper reflects that

the complainant was represented on all dates except on 18.6.2022.

7. It is evident from the materials placed before the Court that

the complainant has been diligently prosecuting the matter. He happened

to be absent on 18.6.2022 as he tested positive for Covid-19 and he was

undergoing treatment.

8. Having considered the entire materials, I am of the view the

judgment impugned is liable to be set aside.

9. In the result, the judgment dated 18.6.2022, acquitting the

accused stands set aside. C.C.No.4471/017 is restored to file. The Trial

Court is directed to proceed with the matter as expeditiously as possible.

Both parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 11.3.2024.

The Crl.Appeal is allowed as above.

Sd/-

K.BABU JUDGE ab

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter