Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paul Joseph vs Special Sale Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 4636 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4636 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Paul Joseph vs Special Sale Officer on 6 February, 2024

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
        TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
                         WP(C) NO. 1128 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:

           PAUL JOSEPH
           AGED 47 YEARS
           S/O JOSEPH, PARACKAL HOUSE, NJEEZHOOR, KOTTAYAM,
           PIN - 686612.
           BY ADVS.
           S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI
           THAJUNA MARIA FRANCIS

RESPONDENT/S:

     1     SPECIAL SALE OFFICER
           NJEEZHOOR SCB GROUP, VAIKOM SAHAKARANA SANGAM, ASSISTANT
           REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OFFICE, VAIKOM, PIN - 686141.

     2     NEEZHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.K-136
           REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT SECRETARY, NEEZHOOR
           BRANCH,NEEZHOOR P.O, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686612.

           BY ADV M.G.KARTHIKEYAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION          ON
06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 1128 OF 2024              2


                                        JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a plantation worker. He is stated to have availed a

loan for a sum of Rs.15 lakhs in the year 2015 from the 2nd respondent

Bank. By way of collateral, the immovable property owned by the petitioner

was mortgaged. The petitioner states that as a direct consequence of the

pandemic, the petitioner suffered financial setbacks, and he could not make

the loan repayments on time. When default was committed, the Bank

initiated proceedings to recover the amounts, and he has now been served

with Ext.P1 recovery notice. It is in the above backdrop that the petitioner

is before this Court seeking issuance of directions to the Bank to grant the

petitioner breathing time to clear the outstanding.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents

submits that the loan was availed in the year 2015, and the total

outstanding as of the date is Rs.24,91,305/-. It is submitted that the 2nd

respondent is not averse to granting the petitioner an opportunity to clear

the outstanding. However, he submits that not more than ten installments

be granted.

3. Upon careful consideration of the submissions made by both

parties, it is evident that the petitioner owes in excess of Rs.24 lakhs to

the 2nd respondent Bank. The respondents, very fairly, have agreed to

permit the petitioner to settle these debts through a limited number of

installments. As a measure of last resort, I am inclined to issue directions

to facilitate the petitioner in discharging his financial obligations to the 2nd

respondent. This approach is deemed necessary to provide a structured

pathway for the petitioner to clear off his monetary liabilities in a

manageable manner.

4. Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, and the following

directions are issued:

(i) The petitioner shall approach the 2nd respondent with a request to inform him of the details of the outstanding amount together with interest and other charges due from him in respect of the loan account. If such a request is made within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the 2nd respondent shall forthwith issue a statement in writing detailing the amounts due.

(ii) On receipt of such a statement, the petitioner shall pay the amounts shown therein in eighteen (18) equal monthly installments. The first of which shall be payable on 15.3.2024, and the balance shall be paid on the 1st of every succeeding month.

(iii) If the amounts are diligently paid in terms of the directions above, coercive proceedings initiated against him by the respondents for the realization of the amount shall be kept in abeyance.

(iv) It is made clear that if the petitioner commits default of any two installments, he will lose the benefit of this judgment, and the concerned respondents will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against him from the stage at which he presently stands and recover the entire

amount along with interest and other charges.

(v) It is further made clear that no application for an extension of time will be entertained.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE Sru

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1128/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04/01/2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter