Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K. Indiradevi vs State Bank Of India Sbi
2024 Latest Caselaw 4611 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4611 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

K. Indiradevi vs State Bank Of India Sbi on 6 February, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
    TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
                        WP(C) NO. 3779 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

    1     K. INDIRADEVI, AGED 65 YEARS
          W/O P.ASOKAN, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.5E PANJOS GARDENS,
          PAVOOR ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.O, KOCHI, PIN - 682024

    2     K.SYAM KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS
          S/O P.ASOKAN, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.5E PANJOS GARDENS,
          PAVOOR ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.O, KOCHI, PIN - 682024

          BY ADVS.
          R.SURAJ KUMAR
          SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL
          N.G.SINDHU
          ANJANA R.S.
          FARZA N.



RESPONDENT:

          STATE BANK OF INDIA SBI
          REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER PERSONAL BANKING
          BRANCH SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE ROAD JAWAHAR NAGAR,
          KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI, PIN - 682020

          BY ADV S.MANU


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 3779 OF 2024
                                              2


                                     JUDGMENT

The petitioners say that they are the sole legal heirs of

late P.Ashokan, who had retired after serving as

Superintendent in the Central Excise; but that they have been

denied access to his accounts maintained by the first

respondent - State Bank of India. They, therefore, pray that the

respondent be directed to block the accounts of P.Ashokan as

an interim measure; and finally allow them to access it and use

its proceeds, without any legal impediment.

2. However, Sri.S.Manu - learned standing counsel for the

respondent, responded to the afore arguments of the

petitioners, as voiced by their learned counsel -

Smt.N.G.Sindhu, saying that a statement has been filed by him,

wherein, his client has explained that there are five accounts in

the name of late Sri.P.Ashokan; but that four of it are in "joint

or Survivor" status between him and Smt.Lakshmi Menon;

while in the fifth - which is a savings account - Smt.Lakshmi

Menon has been shown as the nominee. He submitted that,

therefore, his client has no role to play in the controversy now

sought to be projected by the petitioners and that they must WP(C) NO. 3779 OF 2024

invoke other remedies as are available.

3. In reply, Smt.N.G.Sindhu submitted that the averments

in the statement filed on behalf of the Bank are not correct and

that there is "no possibility" of late Ashokan opening an

account, either in the name of Smt.Lakshmi Menon, or showing

her as a joint holder or nominee. She submitted that there

appears to have been manipulation in the accounts; and

therefore, sought liberty for her client to invoke appropriate

remedies, including before this Court, arraying the

aforementioned Smt.Lakshmi Menon. She, however, prayed

that the Bank be directed to disclose the details of Smt.Lakshmi

Menon to her client, so as to array her as a respondent; and

prayed that this writ petition be ordered on such terms.

4. Sri.S.Manu responded to the afore request, saying that

if the petitioners only require the address of the

aforementioned Smt.Lakshmi Menon as available in his client's

records, it can be made available to them; and that for this, an

application may be directed to be made by them.

In the afore circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition

with the following directions:

WP(C) NO. 3779 OF 2024

(a) The petitioners will be at liberty to approach the

respondent for the address of the aforementioned Smt.Lakshmi

Menon; and if this is done, the same shall be made available to

them by its competent Authority forthwith.

(b) On the petitioners receiving the information as afore,

they will be at liberty to invoke every other appropriate remedy,

including before this Court through a fresh writ petition; for

which purpose, all rival contentions are left open.

In order to enable the petitioners to do as afore, I order

that the interim order granted by this Court will continue to be

in force for a period of two weeks from this date.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE stu WP(C) NO. 3779 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3779/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF SRI.

P ASHOKAN ISSUED BY THE KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DATED 12.01.2024

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CONCERNED PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CONCERNED PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CONCERNED PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CONCERNED PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.01.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter