Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Export Inspection Council Of India vs K.S.Jeejimol
2024 Latest Caselaw 4569 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4569 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Export Inspection Council Of India vs K.S.Jeejimol on 6 February, 2024

Author: Amit Rawal

Bench: Amit Rawal

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
                                       &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
          Tuesday, the 6th day of February 2024 / 17th Magha, 1945
                             WA NO. 114 OF 2023

    AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 28./10/2022 IN WP(C) 9590/2022 OF THIS COURT

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:

  1. EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
     (INSPECTOR & QUALITY CONTROL), 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK I, COMMERCIAL
     COMPLEX, EAST KIDWAI NAGAR, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110023.

    AND 3 OTHERS.

BY ADV. SRI. K.S. PRENJITH KUMAR, CGC

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

     K.S. JEEJIMOL, AGED 57 YEARS, D/O. K.A. SREEDHARAN, JUNIOR HINDI
     TRANSLATOR, EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY, KOCHI-682 011, RESIDING AT
     'ARYA NIVAS', VADUTHALA P.O., KOCHI, PIN - 682023.

BY ADVS. M/S. P.V. SALEEM, SHAFIK M.A. & K.E. HADHIK JAZAR

     Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
to stay the operation of the judgment in WP(C) No.9590 of 2022 dated
28.10.2022 in the interest of justice.
     This Writ Appeal again coming on for orders on 06/02/2024 upon
perusing the appeal memorandum and this Court's order dated 14/06/2023,
the Court on the same day passed the following:
 EXT P12: TRUE COPY OF THE D.O.LETTER   NO.15/42/2013-OL(SERVICE)DATED

   2.5.2013   ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF OFFICIAL

   LANGUAGE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, AND ITS TRUE ENGLISH

   TRANSLATION
                    AMIT RAWAL & C.S.SUDHA, JJ.
          -------------------------------------------------------
                W.A. Nos.114 of 2023 & 809 of 2017
           ----------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 6th day of February, 2024


                                   ORDER

Amit Rawal, J.

1. During the course of the argument, it has been pointed

out that the genesis of the judgment granting benefit to the

respondent had been letter Ext.P12 dated 02.05.2013. The

contents of the letter reads thus:

"You may be aware that Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance vide their Office Memorandum No.1/1/2008-IC dated 24 February, 2008 (copy enclosed) this has been ordered that the Designation and Scale of Pay of Official Language Posts in subordinate offices of Govt. of India are as same as the Cadre of CSOLS. It has come to the knowledge of the Department of Official Language that the Order of the Expenditure Department has not yet been implemented in all Subordinate offices, causing displeasure among the Official Language officials working there.

I will be highly grateful if you may please ensure the compliance of the order of Expenditure Department regarding parity of Designation and Scale of Pay of Official Language cadre posts equal to the CSOLS cadre and the OL department be Informed the action taken on this regard."

2. On perusal of the contents of the letter, it is evident that

this letter is on the basis of the Office Memorandum of Department W.A.Nos.114 of 2023 & 809 of 2017

of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, ordering the Designation and

Scale of pay of Official Language Posts in subordinate offices of the

Government of India to be the same as the Cadre of Central

Secretariat Official Language Service (CSOL).

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the

said letter cannot be sole ground for granting the benefit to the

respondent/petitioner.

4. We confronted the learned counsel as to the contents of

the Office Memorandum dated 24.02.2008. Counsel seeks two

weeks time to place the Office Memorandum dated 24.02.2008 on

record. We are also of the view that the appeal cannot be decided

without looking at the contents of the aforesaid Office

Memorandum.

Post this matter on 27.02.2024.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL JUDGE

Sd/-

C.S.SUDHA JUDGE nak

06-02-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter