Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narfed P.L vs The Assistant Engineer
2024 Latest Caselaw 4505 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4505 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Narfed P.L vs The Assistant Engineer on 6 February, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                         PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
                 WP(C) NO. 3186 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

         NARFED P.L.
         AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. LATHEEF P.M.,
         PATTUKULANGARA HOUSE, PORKULAM P.O.,
         PAZHANJI ROAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680 542.

         BY ADV
              K.RAKESH

RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
         KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
         OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL
         SECTION TIRUR WEST, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM,
         POOKAYIL P.O., THAZHEPALAM, TIRUR,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 107.

    2    THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
         TIRUR POLICE STATION,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
         PIN - 676 101.

         BY ADV
              THANKAPPAN M K, FOR R1
              SREEJITH V.S, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP         FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME         DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.3186 of 2024
                                  :2:



                                JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6th day of February, 2024

The petitioner, who is owner of a Tanker Lorry

bearing registration No.KL-40K-0229, has approached this Court

seeking to direct the respondents to return the key of Tanker

Lorry to the petitioner forthwith.

2. The petitioner states that the vehicle has a

comprehensive Insurance policy valid till 24.10.2024. The

vehicle of the petitioner met with an accident on 02.01.2024,

causing damage to a Transformer (DP Structure) belonging to

the Kerala State Electricity Board and its fencing causing loss to

the tune of about Rs.1,18,439/-.

3. The petitioner states that in connection with the

incident, the 2nd respondent-Station House Officer took the key

of the vehicle and now the same is kept in the Police Station.

The vehicle is parked at the road side close to the place of

accident. Till date, no civil or penal proceedings have been

initiated. Unless the key is released and the petitioner is

permitted to take away the vehicle, the petitioner will be put to

untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf of

the 1st respondent-Assistant Engineer. The Standing Counsel

submitted that the petitioner has caused damages to the KSEB

transformer and its fencing. The petitioner is liable to make up

that loss. The 1st respondent-Assistant Engineer has required

the 2nd respondent-Station House Officer to provide necessary

particulars including number of the vehicle, Insurance Policy and

such other details, which would be required for realisation of the

loss caused to the KSEB.

5. Government Pleader representing the 2 nd respondent-

Station House Officer submitted that though an accident was

reported, the 2nd respondent has not taken the vehicle into

custody and the key is not with the 2 nd respondent as claimed by

the petitioner. However, since the accident is admitted, the

petitioner will have to co-operate with the police, for any future

investigation in the matter if required and produce the lorry as

and when directed by the 2nd respondent.

6. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel representing the 1 st

respondent and the learned Government Pleader representing

the 2nd respondent.

7. The accident caused by the lorry of the petitioner may

be a criminal offence. But, so far no FIR is lodged or criminal

proceedings are taken against the petitioner. Compensation for

damage caused by the alleged accident, is a matter of civil right

for which the 1st respondent will have to take appropriate steps.

On those grounds, if the petitioner's vehicle is kept idle on the

road side, that will not be in the interest of any of the parties.

In the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of

permitting the petitioner to remove the lorry on condition that the

petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation in respect of the

accident, if warranted and produce the vehicle as and when the

2nd respondent-Station House Officer directs the petitioner to

produce it.

Sd/ N. NAGARESH JUDGE AMR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3186/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE VEHICLE PARTICULARS OF TANKER LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL 40/K 0229.

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOODS CARRYING COMPREHENSIVE POLICY OF THE TANKER LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL 40/K 0229 ISSUED BY HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. DATED 3-1-2024.

Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ESTIMATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 3-1-2024.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1(a) TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.DB/TW/VEHICLE DASH/23-24/153 DATED 03.01.2024 ISSUED TO. NARFED.P.L.

Exhibit R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION NO.DB/2023-

                          24/TIRUR    WEST/GENERAL/154    DATED
                          03.01.2024.

Exhibit R1(c)             TRUE COPY OF   THE   SITE   MAHASSAR   DATED
                          02.01.2024.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter