Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Adam Traders vs The Deputy Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 4275 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4275 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Adam Traders vs The Deputy Commissioner on 1 February, 2024

Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
         THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945
                           WP(C) NO. 3991 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:

             ADAM TRADERS,
             818-2, PALA, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.
             ROBY ABRAHAM, PIN - 686575

             BY ADVS.
             AJI V.DEV
             ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV
             S.SAJEEVAN



RESPONDENT/S:

     1       THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
             TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, MINI
             CIVIL STATION, PALA, PIN - 686575

     2       THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
             NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001

     3       THE GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON,
             DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, DELHI G.P.O.,, PIN -
             110001

     4       THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK,
             EAST WING 4TH FLOOR, WORLD MARK - I AERO CITY, NEW DELHI
             REPRESENTED BY ITS - CHAIRMAN,, PIN - 110037
 W.P.(C) No.3991/2024
                                         -2-



     5       THE STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT,
             SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     6       UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE),
             MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK,
             NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001


OTHER PRESENT:

             JASMINE M.M.-GP




         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.3991/2024
                                          -3-




                            JUDGMENT

Heard Mr K Ajiv Dev learned Counsel for the

petitioner and Ms Jasmin M M learned Government Pleader for

the State.

2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following

reliefs:

"i. To call for the records leading to EXT.P.5 proceedings and P.5(a) summery thereof and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order; ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction declaring that the returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR3B during the year 2017-18 were perfectly in order since there was no violation of the provisions contained in Section 16(2)[c] of the GST Acts as alleged in the impugned order; iii. Alternatively, to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents permitting the petitioner to edit and upload actual entries in GSTR-3B for the period from

April, 2017 to March, 2018 so as to enable the petitioner to rectify the errors surfaced therein;

iv. Issue any other writ, direction or order found fit and proper by this Honorable Court on the facts and in the circumstances of this case;"

3. This Court is not an appellate authority against an

assessment order passed under the provisions of the

CGST/SGST Act. There is a specific provision of appeal under

Section 107 of the CGST/SGST Act. In the exercise of the

jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the

Constitutional Court can only examine whether the order is

without jurisdiction or has any procedural impropriety or an

error apparent on the face of the record.

3.1 I find none of the aforesaid conditions available in

the present case. Therefore, I am of the considered view that

the writ petition is wholly misconceived, which is hereby

dismissed. However, the petitioner can avail any other

remedy as may be available to him against the impugned

assessment order if so advised.

Sd/-

DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE

jjj

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3991/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SCRUTINY NOTICE ISSUED IN ASMT-10 DATED: 23.11.2020

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY FILED IN ASMT-11 DATED:

18.08.2021

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY FILED AGAINST THE SCN IN DRC-06 DATED: 27.12.2023

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT DATED: 24.12.2023

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS PASSED U/S. 73 OF THE GST ACTS FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED:

29.12.2023

Exhibit P5(a) TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMERY OF THE ORDER ISSUED IN FORM GST DRC-07/DATED: 30.12.2023

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN C.K. PRAVEEN VS. STATE OF KERALA & ORS [WP(C) NO. 41219 OF 2023/08.12.2023]

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN M/S ORIENT TRADERS VS.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR (WP NO.2911/16.12.2022)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter