Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shiyas S vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 23016 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 23016 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Kerala High Court

Shiyas S vs State Of Kerala on 1 August, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022        1                  2024:KER:59084

                                                            C.R

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
 THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1946
                  WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN MC NO.5 OF 2022 OF
      GRAMA NYAYALAYA, VELLANADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PETITIONER:

              SHIYAS S
              AGED 29 YEARS
              SAJIN MANZIL, MARUTHARATHALAVILA, PRAVACHAMBALAM,
              NEMOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695020


              BY ADVS.
              S.SUNIL MAURYAN
              G.N.NISHA NAIR

RESPONDENTS:
    1     STATE OF KERALA
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

      2       NIMA NISHAR
              AGED 24 YEARS
              NIMAZ MANZIL, ALAMUKKU, NEAR MASJID, POOVACHAL
              P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695575

 ADDL.R3 THE SECRETARY
         MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

 ADDL.R4 THE REGISTRAR GENERAL
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ARE SUO MOTU
         IMPLEADED AS ADDL. R3 & R4 VIDE ORDER DATED
         25/03/2022 IN WP(CRL) 276/2022.


              BY ADVS.
              PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
              S.NIKHIL SANKAR
              B.G.HARINDRANATH
              SUVIN R MENON
              AMITH KRISHNAN H
 WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022      2                2024:KER:59084




OTHER PRESENT:

              SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022          3                       2024:KER:59084

                                                               C.R
                   BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,J
                  ---------------------
                    W.P.(CRL) No.276 of 2022
              ---------------------------
               Dated this the 01st day of August, 2024

                             JUDGMENT

Petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari

to quash Ext.P1 application filed in M.C.No.5/2022 before

the Gram Nyayalaya, Vellanad, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Petitioner is the former husband of the second

respondent. Though their marriage was solemnised on

05.11.2018, subsequently, by Talaq letters sent on

04.11.2019, 31.12.2019 and 02.03.2020, petitioner

dissolved the marriage. In the meantime, the second

respondent preferred an application under Section 3 of the

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

(for short "the Act"), a copy of which is produced as Ext. P1.

After receipt of notice in the said application, petitioner has

approached this Court questioning the jurisdiction of the

Gram Nyayalaya to deal with an application under the Act.

3. According to the petitioner, the Gram Nyayalayas

Act, 2008 (for short "the GN Act") does not confer

jurisdiction upon the Gram Nyayalaya to consider a claim WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022 4 2024:KER:59084

under the Act and hence, the application ought to be

quashed.

4. I have heard Sri. S. Sunil Mauryan, the learned

counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Nikhil Sankar, the learned

counsel for the second respondent, and Sri.Noushad K. A,

the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The question relates to the jurisdiction of the

Gram Nyayalaya to deal with an application under the

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

As per the provisions of the said Act, an application under

Section 3 has to be preferred before the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court. Instead of filing an application before the

Magistrate, the second respondent filed Ext.P1 application

before the Gram Nyayalaya.

6. Section 11 of the GN Act states that

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or any other law for the time

being in force, the Gram Nyayalaya shall exercise both civil

and criminal jurisdiction in the manner and to the extent

provided under this Act." (emphasis supplied). Section 12 of WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022 5 2024:KER:59084

the GN Act dealing with criminal jurisdiction of the Gram

Nyayalaya assumes significance and it reads as follows:-

"12. Criminal jurisdiction.-- (1) Notwithstanding

anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

(2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force, the

Gram Nyayalaya may take cognizance of an offence on a

complaint or on a police report and shall--

(a) try all offences specified in Part I of the First

Schedule; and

(b) try all offences and grant relief, if any, specified

under the enactments included in Part II of that Schedule.

(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-

section (1), the Gram Nyayalaya shall also try all such

offences or grant such relief under the State Acts which

may be notified by the State Government under sub-section

(3) of section 14."

7. In view of Section 12 of the GN Act, the

jurisdiction of the Gram Nyayalaya is to try all offences

specified in Part 1 of the First Schedule. A reading of the

First Schedule to the said Act indicates that an application

under the Act is not included therein though an application WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022 6 2024:KER:59084

for an order of maintenance filed under the Cr.PC is

specifically mentioned in the schedule. In the absence of

inclusion of petitions filed under the Act in the Schedule to

the GN Act, no elaborate discussion is required to conclude

that the Grama Nyayalaya, as a court of exclusive

jurisdiction is not entitled to deal with applications under

the Act. Therefore, the application filed by the second

respondent as Ext.P1 has been filed before the wrong

forum.

8. Though the petitioner has sought for quashing of

Ext.P1 application, it is evident that no grounds have been

raised for such a relief. The contention advanced on the

basis of the wrong forum, can only result in the return of

the application to be presented before the proper forum.

9. Since it has already been held that the Gram

Nyayalaya does not possess the jurisdiction to deal with an

application under Section 3 of the Act, it is necessary that

Ext.P1 application be directed to be returned to the

petitioner to be presented before the proper forum within a

time frame, in accordance with the law.

10. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022 7 2024:KER:59084

directing the Gram Nyayalaya, Vellanad,

Thiruvananthapuram to return the application filed in MC

No.5/2022 to the second respondent for presentation before

the proper forum in a time-bound manner and at the

earliest.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE bng WP(CRL.) NO. 276 OF 2022 8 2024:KER:59084

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 276/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 28- JAN-2022 FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 UNDER SECTION 3 OF THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON DIVORCE ACT,)1986 BEFORE THE HON'BLE GRAM NYAYALAYA, VELLANAMD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 03-FEB-

2022 IN M.C.NO.56 OF 2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY HON'BLE HON'BLE GRAM NYAYALAYA, VELLANAMD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter