Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saajid vs The Thrikaruva Grama Panchayat
2024 Latest Caselaw 9538 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9538 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Saajid vs The Thrikaruva Grama Panchayat on 4 April, 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
THURSDAY, THE 47 DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
P NO. F 2

PETITIONER:

SAAJID,

AGED 48 YEARS

S/0. SHAMSUDHEEN, PROPRIETOR, JAVAN SAW MILL,
RESIDING AT MANAPPURATH KIZHAKETHIL HOUSE,
INCHAVILA, PERINAAD ) PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 691661

BY ADV 0.D.SIVADAS

RESPONDENTS:

1 THE THRIKARUVA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
KANJAVELI PO, KOLLAM,
REPRESENTED BY ETS SECRETARY, PIN - 691602

2 THE SECRETARY, THRIKARUVA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
KANJAVELI PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 661602

3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGIWEER,
KERALA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE,
KOLLAM. PIN-691 668., PIN - 691608

4 MUHAMMED HUSSAIN,
KANJIRAMKUZHI HOUSE, INCHAVILA,
PERINADU PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 692694

5 JALALUDEEN,
KASSIM MANZIL, NJARACKAL,
PERINADU PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 691601

6 MUKESH K.B.,
KALLUVILA PUTHANVEEDU, NJARACKAL,
PERINADU PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 691601

T SAJEEVAN B,
KALLUVILA PUTHANVEEDU, NJARACKAL,
PERINADU PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 691601

8 VINU,
VAYALIL PUTHANVEEDU, NJARACKAL,



PERINADU PO, KOLLAM, PIN - 691601
BY ADV M.R.SASITH - SC

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC ,PCB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 04.64.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:



WP

The above writ petition

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P, J.

Dated this the 4" day of April, 2024

JUDGMENT

prayers;

"i) Call for the records leading to Ext.P11 and Ext.P13 issued by the 3rd respondent and Ext.P12 issued by the lst respondent panchayath and quash the same, by issuing @ writ of certiorari show cause should also be quashed.

ii} Issue appropriate direction restraining the respondents 1 to 3 from interfering in the functioning of the petitioner's unit namely "Javan Saw Mill" and permit the petitioner to run the unit on the basis of the licenses as well as the consent granted by the Kerale Pollution Control Board.

iii) Declare that the coercive proceedings initiated by the Panchayat and Kerala Pollution Centro! Board against the unit of the petitioner's unit, is highly

illegal, arbitrary and without any justification. "

is filed with the following

2. The matter was referred for mediation as per the 'order of this Court dated 04.01.2024. The report submitted by the District Mediation Centre, Kollam indicates that the matter is settled between the parties in terms of the memorandum of agreement until into between the parties on 27.03.2024. This is recorded.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the parties to strictly comply with the terms of the settiement agreement. The report dated 01.64.2624 shat form part of this judgment.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P

LU JUDGE

7 fi yk ries

DISTRICT MEDIATION CENTRE, KOLLAM __

D.No. 51/24/DMC/KLM Date: 01.04.2024

From, Centre Co-ordinator/ Sub Judge, District Mediation Centre, Koliam.

To, Hon'ble Registrar (Judicial) , Hon' ble High Court of Kerala, Kochi- 682031.

Sit, Sub: Mediation in WP(C) No. 23256/2023 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala -- forwarding of - reg

Ref: Letter WP(C) No. 23256/2023 dated 06.01.2024 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.

As per the reference cited above, I here by submit the mediation report (settled along with agreement ) in WP(C) No. 23256/2023 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala for further necessary action.

Yours faithfully,

ME Centre Coordifistor/ Sub Judge,

S- e " ' | + District Mediation Centre, | P os. af oe Kollam,

GND MIMas3 CARB DON Gsnis i? GQ omar. . WIP) No. 25256 [2023

ob ae) : Sg iam were +4 HAHA ;

"DH OIA 5 SMS Daya O'7 "ee, ya Diy leone w

3 Ie AIDS oh Sort eet Ar Vgoer gt Se

8 riprrb(Qser ) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH

RULES 24 AND 25 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE

(MEDIATION) RULES 2005

4. The parties above name beg to submit as follows:

(i) The aforesaid suit/s, Petition/s, Appeal/s, Complaint were referred _-- to

Mediation for resotving the dispute between the parties. In the Course of mediation, they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to the following terms and conditions:

rho3) od agns 05) alge obasteals = A Ox 0 ops $e03 Bom QDaper amen be Aag--

~ 9018) _esanaqoora ons Cetin vas)

yr OR

"ngs oe | Rileway Haynd: .

DVR ayo Gla hereosdenwoe Ns. ee I

om & > vets TrbBonye 52 game

Oo A SS R.3 Yel Ass) éavill ep fey RA MM hugs Hy -

s Gull Vo Hulesh.ka a R7_DRaeEEVT O

Suchay : RE Aes Fe

TW ogame avdale' Mra met dy)

--~36O)) 1 Voom oe of 0 Ly bet wT ww .3) onary NAS) Se yn 3) & alex Gu

SOO mo wimm_-- PII) &s) G30\ BR} OW algunas Sion ) B\UF OD

nape! DOD Wed wP NAA wmm\ ert --~Griw 12 PBASMBID DdmmN (519 slower MY H3S ow Ip OID) VO"

a Nilo: Se moni cai mani tating --J) 4

Zr AGID ~~ wa) a ale ine Cyn nine Qo mane Bom ~oyrre nave LOMsor mv DOr adaw ease 104 Jos

\ . aan PP ingts, A fe (Me™ 9.2 R 4 In n-HeS oer, Hob - op Moho Rs | ne S R¢. Mukesh. 4- Pm anew ; ons A¥e o IPH ,

Sfiie"

RY » Abiak

' 2. In view of the aforesaid agreement entered into between the parties. The parties pray that the suit/s, Petition/s, Appeal/s be decree/dismissed/ Disposed of, in terms of the aforesaid agreement.

3. In view of the aforesaid agreement, the plaintiff/s Appellant/s prays For refund of the full institution Fee.

4. Parties will appear on before for the Hon'ble cout for passing Orders/Decree in terms of the above said agreement.

|

|

|

|

Ore Bike Defendant/s |

:

|

Rlaintif/s, Petitioner/s Appellants;Applicants CO> edaGdlyt: S Respondent/s > Molnsmn ul Complainant. tho x ah, yee

ty altos eS Advocate for aks e for Plainrtiff/s, Petitioners k6 Mukesh: kG Defendant/s \Qonnclnayt

Appeilant/s, Applicant/s Respondents, Complainant. RS, hal ae A a Accuses, mem Hw os dole

Ree ie) ch ale

We, the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what. Is contained in paragraphs 1 to vr Are true to the best of our knowledge, information and belief

edsQ FS :

Plainttifffs, Petitioner/s yuk | Respondent/s

Appellant/s, Applicant/s

Complaint.

Place: SyYS- Aho.

Date: ArT aldeal,

KS Nuvesh ks oS a

Defendantis, hugh sds

Accused hyp g yn DS A NE-

MPI HWoGeu + fy Re Full Q--

py ch EEO az

. | oN Noglnan W Ri (pasat) / Ra 8 \,

---

aml

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23256/2623 PETITIONER EXHIBITS <=

EXHIBIT P 1 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE DATED 29.4.2019 ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYAT

EXHIBIT PZ TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE DATED 6.81.2621 ISSUED FROM THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER PUNALUR,

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT GRANTED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DATED 10.05.2621

EXHIBIT P4 THE LICENSE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 3.8.2621 TO THE PETITIONER VALID TILL 31.3.2022.

EXHIBIT PS TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 7.64.2622

OF THE iST RESPONDENT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF FEE FOR RENEWAL OF LICENSE.

EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SAWMILL IN ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION, WHEN THE PETITIONER PURCHASED THE SAWMILL.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 9.11.26021 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P8& THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PRESENT UNIT OF THE PETITIONER AFTER ENCLOSING THE UNIT SHEETS.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED

28.66.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.7.2022 IN W.P. (C) NO.25762/2621 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 25.11.2622 OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, KOLLAM.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE DATED 14.3.2623 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P 14 TRUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT DATED 23.82.2022 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE TEST REPORT DATED 36.1.2823 ISSUED BY THE QUALITY MANAGER OF THE APPROVED LABORATORY.

EXHIBIT Pi6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 3.2.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT R4 (A) A TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SAOWING THE PETITIONER'S UNIT COVERED WITH TIN SHEETS ADJACENT TO THE BOUNDARIES OF THE RESPONDENT'S PROPERTY.

EXHIBIT R4 (Bj) A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DATED 26/88/2022

EXHIBIT R4 (C) A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.61.2623

IN W.P(C) 21935/2022

EXHIBIT R4 (D) A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13/04/2623

// True Copy // PA To Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter