Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9249 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946
CRL.MC NO. 3146 OF 2024
CC NO.193 OF 2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,
KASARAGOD
PETITIONER/ ACCUSED :
1 VISMAYA SILKS AND SAREES
AT KMC 1/1185, MAS COMPLEX, KANHANGAD,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING
PARTNER, PIN - 671315
2 P A ABDULLA
AGED 40 YEARS
S/O. P. MOHAMMED, MANAGING PARTNER,
VISMAYA SILKS AND SAREES, AT KMC 1/1185,
MAS COMPLEX, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
PIN - 671315
BY ADVS.
T.G.RAJENDRAN
T.R.TARIN
RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT AND STATE :
1 MOHAMMED BASHEER T A
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. T.ABDUL KHADER, BASHEER BAGH,
NEAR SAADIYA ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL,
DELI P.O., KALNAD, KASARAGOD,
PIN - 671121
2 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682031
SRI. NOUSHAD K. A., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO. 3146 OF 2024
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Crl.M.C.No.3146 of 2024
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2024
ORDER
Petitioner was the accused in C.C.No.193 of 2014 on the files of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Kasaragod. The case arose
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The learned
Magistrate found the accused guilty and sentenced him to undergo
imprisonment till the raising of the court and to pay compensation. The
appeal and the criminal revision filed against the aforesaid judgment
ended in dismissal. In the meantime, in execution of the sentence, a
warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner, copy of which is
produced as Annexure A1. According to the petitioner, he has already
preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court and the
same has not been taken up for consideration and if in the meantime the
warrant of arrest is executed, he would be prejudiced.
2. I have heard Sri.Rajendran T.G., the learned counsel for the
petitioners as well as Sri.Noushad K.A., the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The issuance of a warrant of arrest in the event of failure to
abide by the direction to pay compensation and to undergo the sentence
of imprisonment imposed is a natural corollary of a judgment of
conviction and sentence attaining finality. Unless the said judgment is
reversed or stayed, the natural process contemplated under law will have CRL.MC NO. 3146 OF 2024
to be carried into effect. Since concededly the Special Leave petition has
been preferred before the Supreme Court, the remedy of the petitioner is
to obtain orders from the said court. Recourse to the inherent jurisdiction
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. when the case is pending before the
Supreme Court and that too in the absence of any exceptional
circumstances is unwarranted and cannot be resorted to.
Therefore, I find no merit in this Crl.M.C. and it is dismissed.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
RKM CRL.MC NO. 3146 OF 2024
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
Annexure A1 COPY OF THE WARRANT OF ARREST DATED 1.3.2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!