Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Roshini Rani vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9110 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9110 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.Roshini Rani vs The State Of Kerala on 3 April, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
    WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                     WP(C) NO. 40979 OF 2016
PETITIONERS:
     1     K.ROSHINI RANI,
           AGED 57 YEARS (DATE OF BIRTH 4.6.1959)
           D/O A.KOCHUKUNJU,PROFESSOR(RETIRED ON 30.6.2015)
           SREE SWATHI THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF
           MUSIC,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,RESIDING AT
           TC 4/1168,AMBADY, KULATHOOR.P.O,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 583.
     2     K.CHANDINI RANI,
           AGED 55 (DATE OF BIRTH 25.7.1962)
           D/O.A.KOCHUKUNJU,JOINT CHIEF EDITOR,KERALA LEGISLATURE
           SECRETARIAT,VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,RESIDING AT
           TC 4/1168,AMBADY,KULATHOOR.P.O,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 583.
     3     K.VINOD KUMAR,
           AGED 43 YEARS (DATE OF BIRTH 26.5.1973)
           S/O.A.KOCHUKUNJU,DEMONSTRATOR IN COMPUTER
           ENGINEERING,GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC
           COLLEGE,THIRURANGADI,RESIDING AT TC
           4/1168,AMBADY,KULATHOOR.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 583.
           BY ADV SRI.P.V.MOHANAN
RESPONDENTS:
     1     THE STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,SCHEDULED CASTES/SCHEDULED
           TRIBES,DEVELOPMENT
           DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
     2     THE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF COMMUNITY
           CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTED VIDE ACT 11 OF 1996 AS
           AMENDED BY ACT 32 OF 2008,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR
           VERIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CERTIFICATES,SC/ST
           DEVELOPMENT (G)DEPARTMENT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
     3     THE DIRECTOR KERALA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH TRAINING AND
           DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF SCHEDULED CASTE/ SCHEDULED
           TRIBES,(KIRTADS),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
           BY ADVS.
           SMT.LATHA T THANKAPPAN, SPL. GP
     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 40979 OF 2016
                                 2

                           JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1

proceedings of the Scrutiny Committee for verification of

community certificate under the Kerala (Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes) Regulation of Issue of Community

Certificates Act, 1996 and the consequential order issued by the

Government of Kerala as Ext.P2 declaring the petitioners not to

be members of the Scheduled Caste (Sambava) community and

that they belong to the Ezhava community.

2. Sri.P.V.Mohanan, the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioners would submit that the findings in Ext.P1

proceedings of the Scrutiny Committee cannot be sustained in

law for more reasons than one. He submits that without going

into any of those aspects, Ext.P1 order is liable to be set aside for

the reason that it was issued only by the Chairman of the

Scrutiny Committee. It is submitted that the proceedings of the

Scrutiny Committee should be issued by all the three members

of the Committee. Reference is made in this regard to a Division

Bench judgment of this Court in O.P(KAT)No.399 of 2017,

where this Court found that orders issued by the Scrutiny WP(C) NO. 40979 OF 2016

Committee in the name of its Chairman alone cannot be held to

be proceedings of the Committee. It is pointed out that the law

laid down in Ext.P9 was also followed by this Court in judgment

dated 06.07.2023 in W.P (C) No.17595 of 2019 (Ext.P10).

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing

for the official respondents very fairly concedes that Ext.P1

order does not appear to be an order issued by the Committee

and this appears to be an irregularity.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned Special Government Pleader, I am of the

opinion that this writ petition is liable to be allowed on the short

ground that Ext.P1 proceedings cannot be termed to the

proceedings of the Scrutiny Committee constituted under the

provisions of the Kerala (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

Tribes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1996

and the Rules framed thereunder. The proceedings issued by

the Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee cannot be termed to be

the proceedings of the Scrutiny Committee in the light of the

law laid down by this Court in Exts.P9 and P10 judgments.

Therefore, Ext.P1 is quashed. As a consequence Ext.P2

Government Order will also stand quashed. The question of WP(C) NO. 40979 OF 2016

determination of the caste status of the petitioners shall stand

restored to the file of the Scrutiny Committee for verification of

community certificates constituted under the Kerala (Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Regulation of Issue of Community

Certificates Act, 1996 and the Rules framed thereunder. All

contentions taken by the petitioners are left open to be urged

before the Committee. Status quo as on today shall be

maintained till fresh orders are passed by the Scrutiny

Committee, as directed above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 40979 OF 2016

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40979/2016

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO.15392/G3/2011/SCSTDD DATED 16.08.2016.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER G.O.(MS) NO.100/2016/SCSTDD DATED 2.12.2016 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE OF THE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE DATED 19.03.2013 ENCLOSING THE REPORTS OF THE KIRTADS DATED 22.12.2012.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION WITH DOCUMENTS.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 15.02.2014.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18.03.2014.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTES OF ARGUMENT. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER G.O.(P) NO.151/2012/SCSTDD DATED 10.12.2012. Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP(CAT) NO 399/2017 DATED 30.8.2019 Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.PC NO 17595/2019 DATED 6.7.2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(A) A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE SCHOOL REGISTER ISSUED BY MTSSLP SCHOOL Exhibit R1(B) A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF SSLC BOOK OF PETITIONER'S FATHER Exhibit R1(C) A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PENSION BOOK OF PETITIONER'S FATHER Exhibit R1(D) A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF VICAR OF THE ABOVE CHURCH Exhibit R1(E) A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF VICAR OF THE ABOVE CHURCH Exhibit R1(F) A TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND PAGE OF THE SSLC BOOK OF PETITIONER'S MOTHER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter