Friday, 17, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Khairunnisa vs The Divisional Forest Officer, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10390 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10390 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Khairunnisa vs The Divisional Forest Officer, ... on 11 April, 2024

WP(C) No.9732/2024                       1/7

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
            Thursday, the 11th day of April 2024 / 22nd Chaithra, 1946
                              WP(C) NO. 9732 OF 2024
   PETITIONER:

          KHAIRUNNISA, AGED 57 YEARS, W/O LATE M.M. ABDUL RAHIMAN, RESIDING AT
          RAIF MANIZIL, MOOSODY, UPPALA (P.O), MANJESHWAR TALUK, KASARAGOD
          DISTRICT, PIN - 671322.

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, KASARAGOD UDAYAGIRI, VIDYANAGAR -
         ULIYATHADKA ROAD, KUDLU, VIDYANAGAR (P.O), KASARAGOD. PIN - 671121.,
         PIN - 671121.
      2. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, KASARAGOD NEAR RAILWAY STATION, KASARAGOD,
         PIN - 671121.
      3. ARIF, S/O LATE M.M. ABDUL RAHIMAN, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. G-4, DOOR
         NO.2D, REHUMANIA AARTMENT, ADUKA, MANGALPADDY (P.O), KASARAGOD, PIN
         - 671324.


        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2, to provisionally grant license
   to the petitioner, for continuing the sawmill business, under the Kerala
   Forest (Regulation of Sawmills and Other Wood-Based Industrial Units)
   Rules, 2021, pending the disposal of writ petition.


        This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
   and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and this Court's order dated
   21.3.2024 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S JAWAHAR JOSE, CISSY
   MATHEWS and SAFEER BAWA A.S., Advocates for the petitioner,GOVERNMENT
   PLEADER for R1 and R2 and of SMT.REENA ABRAHAM.R,Advocate for R3, the
   court passed the following:




                                                                 p.t.o
 WP(C) No.9732/2024                             2/7



                                   VIJU ABRAHAM,J
                                 ------------------
                          W.P.(C).Nos.9732 & 1610 of 2024
                          --------------------------------
                       Dated this the 11th day of April, 2024

                                              ORDER

The above writ petitions are filed challenging

Ext.P16 order wherein the petitioners were directed

to produce certain documents for renewal of the

existing saw mill licence, which is detailed below:

i. The petitioner ought to have submitted the

application for renewal 3 months prior to the

expiry of Exhibit-P2 license, i.e 3 months prior

to 11-2-2023, which is in the month of November,

2022. As the petitioner has submitted the

application only on 23.1.2024, the same cannot be

considered as per Rule 8(vi) of 2021 Rules.

ii. The petitioner has not submitted the notarized

affidavit of all the legal heirs of the deceased

licensee.

iii. The petitioner has not produced the

ownership certificate in the name of the new

licensee, other than the ownership certificate in

the name of the deceased licensee.

iv. The petitioner has not produced the

possession certificate in the name of the new

licensee, other than that in the name of the Haji

V.K. Aboobacker and 3 others.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that the petitioner in WP(C) No.1610 of

2024, is a legal heir of late Abdul Rahiman

objected to the renewal of the license, etc., and

has preferred the said writ petition.

3. When the matter came up for consideration on

an earlier occasion, both sides submitted that

there is a chance for settlement and the matter

was posted before the mediation centre attached to

the Court and that the issue has been settled

between the parties on certain agreed terms.

4. As regard the 1st direction that in Ext.P16

that there is a delay in submitting the

application within time and that an explanation

should be submitted for the delay, petitioner

would submit that necessary affidavit explaining

the delay will be submitted within a period of 10

days from the date of receipt of a copy of the

order. As regard the second direction to produce a

notarized No Objection Certificate in respect of

all the legal heirs mentioned in the legal

heirship certificate, petitioner would submit that

necessary documents in this regard will be

submitted. As regard the 3rd direction to produce

fresh ownership certificate in respect of the

building in question, petitioner would submit

that as per Ext.P8 order produced in WP(C) No.9732

of 2024 issued by the competent civil court in

I.A.No.4 of 2021 in O.S.No.43/2020 the petitioner

is already appointed as authorised signatory for

and to carry on the business of M/S.Badryath Wood

Industries, Badiadka standing in item Nos.2 to 4

of plaint 'A' schedule property. Petitioner would

further submit that in Ext.P6 judgment of the

competent civil court which is produced in WP(C)

No.9732 of 2024 in a suit for partition,

preliminary decree has been passed wherein it is

declared that the late Abdul Rahiman is the owner

of the property and his legal heirs are entitled

to inherit the property as stated in paragraph 6

of the judgment and that the petitioner is one of

the legal heirs and she is entitled to run the

unit and consent letters of all the legal heirs

will be produced before the authority. Petitioner

would further submit that since only a preliminary

decree has been passed declaring the right of the

parties and only in the final decree proceedings,

petitioner will be entitled for physical

possession of the property decreed, after

demarcation of the said property. Petitioner

submits that she will produce the certified copy

of the preliminary decree along with an affidavit

stating that necessary documents in this regard

will be produced after the final decree

proceedings are over. As regards the 4th direction,

since possession certificate is issued in favour

of Haji V.K. Aboobacker, necessary notarized

consent letter will be produced and rent deed if

any, will be produced before the authorities.

Therefore, it is ordered that on submission of

these documents, the request made by the

petitioners for renewal of license shall be

considered by the 1st respondent within a period of

2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of the

order, after affording an opportunity of being

heard to the petitioners and any other affected

parties.

Post on 22.05.2024.

sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE

pm

11-04-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9732/2024 Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE DATED 12-2-2018 BEARING NO.

79/2017-18/KSGD ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit -P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 30-1-2024 IN O.S. NO.43/2020 OF THE SUB COURT, KASARAGOD. Exhibit -P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26-3-2021 IN I.A.NO.4/2021 IN O.S.NO.43/2020 OF THE SUB COURT, KASARAGOD.

Exhibit -P16 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28-2-2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

11-04-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter