Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10236 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
Monday, the 8th day of April 2024 / 19th Chaithra, 1946
WP(C) NO. 30981 OF 2017 (W)
PETITIONER:
K.DAMODARAN, BLUE BELLS, KALATHINGAL, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE.
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOZHIKODE
KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 001.
3. KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.D2628, KARASSERY PO,
KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 682, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE FEROKE, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 688.
5. ADDL.R5. N.K.ABDURAHIMAN, CHAIRMAN, KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
BANK LTD., NO.D.2628, KARASSERY P.O., KOZHIKODE [IS IMPLEADED AS THE
RESPONDENT NO.5 IN I.A.16929/2017 IN WP(C)30981/2017 AS PER ORDER
DATED 31.10.2017].
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action and stop the
functioning of the sub centre of the 3rd respondent at Ramanattukara as a
full fledged branch pending disposal of the Writ Petition (Civil).
This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and this Court's order dated
27.09.2017 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR, ANITHA
RAVINDRAN, HARISANKAR N UNNI, T.RESHMA & S.SIKKY, Advocates for the
petitioner, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for R1, R2 & R4, SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN,
STANDING COUNSEL for R3, the court passed the following:
AMIT RAWAL & EASWARAN S., JJ.
============================
W.P. (C) Nos.19268, 29504, 30981
& 34283 of 2017 and 1846 of 2018
============================
Dated this the 08th day of April, 2024
ORDER
AMIT RAWAL, J.
Writ Appeal No.1195/2020 is arising out of the
judgment of the learned Single Bench challenging the
vires of Section 74B of the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act. The prime argument on which the vires
has been challenged is that the provisions of Sections
101 and 74B have an overlapping effect. In other
words, once the Government has granted the
permission under Section 101 of the Kerala
Co-operative Societies Act, permitting the appellant
co-operative Society to have its area of operation in
the Municipal Corporation of Calicut, the Registrar
cannot truncate/curtail the right of the Society, while
entertaining the application for sanction of the
permissions as envisaged under Section 74B. For that, W.P(C).19268/17 & con. cases
separate writ petitions have also been filed
challenging the orders of the Registrar and the order
of the Government. By separate order, we will be
deciding the vires of the appeal.
2. We confronted the learned Counsel
representing the petitioners, whether they want to
have an adjudication of the writ petitions by the
Division Bench or the Single Bench, they have
requested for remitting the matters to the Single
Bench.
3. Accordingly, all the writ petitions tagged with
the writ appeal are detached and ordered to be listed
by the Registry before the concerned Court having
jurisdiction.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
Sd/-
EASWARAN S., JUDGE NB/8-4
08-04-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!