Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10138 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 14179 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
MOHAMMED SHAFEER C.M
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O UMMER HAJI, CHOLAMUGHATH HOUSE, THAZHAKODE WEST.P.O,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA,, PIN - 679341
BY ADVS.
LIJIN THAMBAN
DEEPIKA G.S.
C.RADHAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
(CHITTY ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, EX-MAYOR
R BALAKRISHNAN NAIR ROAD, NEAR DISTRICT COURT, VANCHIYCOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT -, PIN - 695035
2 THE BRANCH MANAGER
KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD, PERINTHALMANNA
BRANCH, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ., PIN - 679322
3 DEPUTY THAHASILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY)
OPPOSITE AROMA THEATRE, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES
LTD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001
4 THE MANAGER, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD
KSFE LTD OFFICE, CHEMBUKKAVU, TRISSUR DISTRICT,
KERALA, PIN - 680020
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.04.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 14179 OF 2024
2
JUDGMENT
Even though Sri.Lijin Thamban, learned counsel for the
petitioner impelled various allegations and assertions against
Ext.P8 impugned order, Sri. Salil Narayanan K.A., learned counsel
for respondents 2 and 4 submitted that this writ petition is not
maintainable, because the impugned order is amenable to a
statutory challenge under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act.
2. Even though Sri.Lijin Thamban, learned counsel for
the petitioner affirmed that his client obtains an alternative
remedy, he argued that, nevertheless, this writ petition is
maintainable because Ext.P8 has been issued in gross error.
3. I am afraid that I cannot find favour with the afore
submissions of Sri.Lijin Thamban because, it is now well settled
that when an effective statutory alternative remedy is available,
the invocation of the discretionary power of this Court under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India is generally not tenable.
In the above circumstances, I close this writ petition
however; leaving full liberty of the petitioner to invoke every
statutory remedy against Ext.P8, for which purpose, all rival
contentions are also left open.
However, in order to enable the petitioner to invoke the
afore remedy without the threat of imminent action, I direct the WP(C) NO. 14179 OF 2024
respondents not to pursue coercive recovery action against them
for a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
rp WP(C) NO. 14179 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14179/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) 7376/2017 DATED 23/03/2017
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01/07/2015 IN W.P(C)
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/11/2016 IN W.P(C)
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH DOCUMENTS DATED 13.08.2017
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT 15.03.2023
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.03.2023
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30/01/2023 IN W.P(C)
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO. IGR/65/2023 DATED 13/09/2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!