Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9612 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 17TH BHADRA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 7212 OF 2023
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2:
1 BINOY P.B
AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.P.K.BHASKARAN,
PARIYARATHU HOUSE, PARAMTHODU KARA,
CHIRAKKADAVU, CHERUVALLI VILLAGE,
KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN - 686506
2 RAJEEV K.K
AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN,
KUMBLANICKAL HOUSE, PADINJATTU BHAGOM,
CHIRAKKADAVU VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN - 686506
BY ADVS.
NIREESH MATHEW
C.C.THOMAS (SR.)(T-48)
RESPONDENT/COMPLANANT - STATE:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
KOCHI., PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:
VIPIN NARAYAN PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 08.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.7212/2023
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No.7212 of 2023
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 08th day of September, 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed by the accused
in Crime No.24/2023 of Excise Range Office, Erumeli. The 1 st
petitioner was the licensee of all the toddy shops in Group
No.V in Erumeli Excise Range, Kottayam Division. The 2nd
petitioner is the worker in Toddy Shop No.26 included in the
said group. On 01.03.2023 at 2.35 pm, a case is registered
against the petitioners on the allegation that the petitioners
sold Indian made foreign liquor purchased from the Kerala
State Beverages Corporation, which violates the Abkari Act
and the Rules. Annexure-A is the certified copy of the crime
and occurrence report and Annexure-B is the copy of the
mahazar. It is submitted that on the basis of the registration of
the case for offence other than under Section 56(b) of the
Abkari Act, the license of the 1 st petitioner is suspended and
thereafter cancelled. The 1st petitioner filed WP(C).
No.15856/2023 challenging the order of suspension and Crl.M.C.No.7212/2023
cancellation of the licenses. It is further submitted that this
Court was pleased to stay the resale of the toddy shop and
posted for hearing.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that the final report
is not filed in Crime No.24/2023 even after 6 months. The case
is detected on 01.03.2023. Though the 1st petitioner
approached the Excise Inspector several times, it is stated that
they are not finalizing the investigation for the reasons best
known to him. It is the definite case of the petitioners that
even if the entire allegation are admitted in toto, the offence
will lie only under Section 56(b) of the Abkari Act, which is
compoundable. The petitioners relies on the judgment of this
Court in Thomaskutty Vs. Commissioner of Excise, Tvm &
others[2016 KHC 187]. Hence this criminal miscellaneous
case.
3. Heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri.C.C.Thomas,
as instructed by Adv.Nireesh Mathew, and the learned Public
Prosecutor.
4. The Senior Counsel submitted that in the light of
Annexure-D judgment [Thomaskutty's case (supra)], the
offences under Sections 55D and 55(i) of the Abkari Act are not Crl.M.C.No.7212/2023
attracted. This Court perused Annexure-D judgment,
especially paragraphs 40 and 45. It will be better to extract
paragraphs 40 and 45 of the above judgment:
"40. In the light of the above discussion, I do not hesitate to hold that Section 55 of the Act has no application to the alleged crime the fourth respondent has been charged with.
45. In the light of the above statutory principles and the judicial dicta, I am of the opinion that for any breach of the licence conditions, which may have been, incidentally, an offence under the other provisions of the Act, the licencee could be made answerable under Section 56 of the Act, but not other provisions--especially penal--of the Act."
5. In the light of the same, I think the offence under
Section 55 is not attracted. A similar view is taken by this
Court in W.P.(C). No.27197/2011 and in Crl.M.C.
No.4416/2010. In the light of the above order, I am of the
considered opinion that the offences under Sections 55D and
55(i) of the Abkari Act in Annexure-A crime and occurrence
report are to be set aside. But the respondents can proceed
with the investigation as far as the offence under Section
56(b) of the Abkari Act is concerned. The petitioners are also Crl.M.C.No.7212/2023
free to compound the same, if permissible as per law.
Therefore, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed
of in the following manner:
1. The offences alleged under Sections 55D and
55(i) of the Abkari Act in Annexure-A crime
and occurrence report are set aside and the
respondents are free to proceed under Section
56(b) of the Abkari Act against the petitioners.
2. I make it clear that the petitioners are free to
compound the offence under Section 56(b) of
the Abkari Act, if the same is permissible as
per law.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JV JUDGE
Crl.M.C.No.7212/2023
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 7212/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure-A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CRIME AND
OCCURRENCE REPORT IN CR.NO.24/2023 OF EXCISE INSPECTOR, ERUMELI EXCISE RANGE DATED 01.03.2023.
Annexure-B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 01.03.2023 PREPARED BY THE EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PONKUNNAM.
Annexure-C TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.08.2023 SENT TO THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ERUMELI.
Annexure-D TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DECISION, THOMASKUTTY VS. COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, TVM & OTHERS REPORTED IN 2016 KHC 187 .
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!