Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10615 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 24TH ASWINA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 8271 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CMP 2524/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOCHI
(CRIME NO.1811 OF 2023 OF THOPPUMPADY POLICE STATION)
PETITIONER
NOUSHARBAN @ CHIKKU
AGED 22 YEARS
S/O . HANEEF, H.NO.3/401, AMBALATH VEEDU,
MATTANCHERRY/ ERNAKULAM, NOW RESIDING AT
AMBALATHVEEDU, KUZHUPPILLY, EDAVANAKKADU, NJARAKKAL,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682501
BY ADV HABEEBA MOOSA
RESPONDENT
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (REPRESENTING S.I OF
POLICE, THOPPUMPADY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM), HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.P.G.MANU(MAMMALASSERY), SR.PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No. 8271 of 2023
2
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P, J.
---------------------------------------------
B.A. No.8271 of 2023
------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 16th day of October, 2023
ORDER
This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1811/2023 of Thoppumpady Police Station, which was registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 364, 364A, 365, 323, 324,
392, 307 read with Section 37 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on
23.08.2023 at about 3.00 hours, the petitioner along with other
accused persons abducted the victims in their car, took them to a
ground near Malippuram Karthedam road as they demanded
money for their MDMA business and brutally assaulted them with
an iron rod, PVC pipe on their back, neck and legs, with an
intention to kill them. Thereby the accused have committed the
offence. The petitioner was arrested on 28.08.2023, and since
then, he has been under judicial detention. B.A. No. 8271 of 2023
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent of all the allegations.
` 6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer
sought by the petitioner.
7. I have gone through the records. From the materials
placed on record, it is evident that there are specific allegations
against the petitioner that the accused persons abducted the
victims and took them to a ground near Malippuram Karthedam
road as they demanded money for their MDMA business and
brutally assaulted them with iron road and PVC pipe on their
back, neck and legs, with an intention to kill them and also the
fact there are five other crimes against the petitioner, out of which
two are NDPS cases and also the fact that eight serious injuries
have been caused to the victims, I do not find this as a fit case in
which bail can be granted to the petitioner, despite the fact that
the 2nd accused has already been granted bail. In such
circumstances, I do not find any merit in this application, and B.A. No. 8271 of 2023
accordingly, the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P
smm JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!