Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shanmughan Kp vs Banseera
2023 Latest Caselaw 5694 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5694 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2023

Kerala High Court
Shanmughan Kp vs Banseera on 16 May, 2023
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                                     &
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
           Tuesday, the 16th day of May 2023 / 26th Vaisakha, 1945
                   CM.APPL.NO.1/2023 IN WA NO. 933 OF 2023
   AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED IN 24/02/2023 IN WP(C) 18929/2022 OF THIS COURT
APPELLANT/ADDL 7TH RESPONDENT:

     SHANMUGHAN K.P, S/O CHERIYATHAN,AGED 60 YEARS, KEDAR HOUSE,
     KUNNAPPALLY P.O, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 679 322.

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 10/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6:

  1. BANSEERA, D/O MOOSA, AGED 30 YEARS, MUTHEDAN HOUSE, KARINCHAPPADI,
     RAMAPURAM P.O, MAKKARAPARAMBU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -676507
  2. ABOO THAHIR, S/O HUSSAIN, AGED 21 YEARS, KODAPPANAKKAL HOUSE,
     PUZHAKKATTIRI P.O, RAMAPURARN, MALAPPURAM - 679321
  3. MOHAMMEDALI,S/O KUNHEEL, AGED 52 YEARS, KANAKKAYIL HOUSE, PANG P.O,
     KURUVA, MALAPPURAM DT - 679338
  4. UNAIS, S/O UNEENKUTTY, AGED 28 YEARS, KALLANKUNNAN HOUSE,
     PUZHAKKATTIRI P.O, MALAPPURAM -679321.
  5. SHANMUGHAN, S/O BALAKRISHNA MENON, AGED 56 YEARS, PULLALIL HOUSE,
     VALAMBUR P.O, ANGADIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DT - 679322
  6. SURESH, S/O NARAYANAN EZHUTHACHAN, AGED 36 YEARS, PARAYANCHOLA
     HOUSE, ANAMANGAD P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679357
  7. JINESH THOMAS, S/O THOMAS, AGED 39 YEARS, MEEMPILLIL HOUSE,
     PARIYARAM P.O, ANGADIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DT - 679322
  8. PRASAD. P.V, S/O BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 48 YEARS, PUTHENVEETTIL
     HOUSE, PATHAIKKARA P.O, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DT - 679322
  9. MOITHU, S/O KUNHALAN, AGED 54 YEARS, KODALIL HOUSE, ELAMKULAM P.O,
     MALAPPURAM, DISTRICT , - 679321
 10. MUHAMMED BASHEER, S/O MAIDU, AGED 42 YEARS, KARAKUZHIYIL HOUSE,
     PARIYAPURAM P.O, ANGADIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676302
 11. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLY,
     GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001
 12. THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL
     SUPPLIES PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, OPP. MUSEUM, VIKAS BHAVAN.P.O,
     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 685033
 13. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
     CIVIL SUPPLIES,   PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING. OPP. MUSEUM, VIKAS
     BHAVAN.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 685033
 14. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MALAPPURAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION
     MALAPPURAM   UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676505
 15. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICE, MALAPPURAM
     CIVIL STATION,UP HILL, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676505
 16. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, TALUK SUPPLY OFFICE, PERINTHALMANNA PO ,
     MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN - 679322
      Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to condone the delay
of 38 days in filing the writ appeal.
     This Application coming on for orders on 16/05/2023 upon perusing
the application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon
hearing the arguments of M/S.P.K.SANTHAMMA & JISHA P.C., Advocates for the
petitioner and Government Pleader for R11 to R16, the court on the same
day passed the following:
                                              1



                       ANIL K. NARENDRAN & C.S.DIAS, JJ.
                     -----------------------------------------------
                                  W.A.No.933 of 2023
                           ----------------------------------
                        Dated this the 16th day of May, 2023

                                        ORDER

Anil K. Narendran, J.

C.M.Appl.No.1 of 2023

During the course of arguments, the learned counsel on both

sides would point out that the 5th respondent alone is the contesting

party respondent.

In such circumstances, service of notice on respondents 1 to 4

and 6 to 10 is dispensed with.

Having considered the averments in the affidavit filed in

support of this application and also the submissions made by the

learned counsel for the appellant and also the learned counsel for

the 5th respondent, we find that the appellant has made out

sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 38 days in filing the

appeal.

In the result, this application is allowed.

W.A.No.933 of 2023

List the appeal for admission on 19.05.2023.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

MIN

16-05-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter