Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2709 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944
WA NO. 444 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.01.2023 IN WP(C) 21394/2022
OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/2nd RESPONDENT:
HAMEEDA BASHEER, AGED 67 YEARS, W/O.BASHEER,
RESIDING AT VILAYIL ROSE VILLA,
ADIKATTUKULANAGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690
504
BY ADV R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND 1st RESPONDENT IN WPC:
1 SAJEEV T S, S/O.SHEIK MAITHEEN RAVUTHER,
THETTIKUZHIYIL, ADIKATTUKULANAGARA P.O.
NOORANADU, PIN - 690 504
2 THE GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA
DISTRICT, PIN - 691 523
BY ADV VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL
ADV. B UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL SR GP
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..2..
J U D G M E N T
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
The dispute between the parties falls on a
narrow compass. The appellant is the owner of
the land comprised in Re.Sy.No.168/3 of Pallickal
Village, Adoor Taluk, Pathananthitta. The
registration and dealer's licence were issued to
the first respondent herein namely, Sajeev T.s.
under the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal
Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015
(for short "Rules"). There appears to have an
agreement between the appellant and the first
respondent initially, and based on that, the
registration and dealer's licence were issued.
The dealer's licence issued has been renewed
annually. The appellant has a case that when the
first respondent obtained dealer's licence on
11.04.2022, no consent letter has been issued to
the first respondent by her and the consent
letter produced before the authority was a forged WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..3..
one.
2. The learned senior counsel for the first
respondent submits that consent was obtained in
the year 2020 and acting upon the consent letter,
renewal of dealer's licence was granted from time
to time.
3. Acting upon the complaint of the
appellant, the District Geologist, Pathanamthitta
initiated proceedings and passed an order on
8.06.2022 cancelling the registration and
dealer's licence. This was challenged before the
learned Single Judge.
4. The learned Single Judge heard the
matter and allowed the writ petition quashing the
impugned order cancelling the registration as
well as the dealer's licence. The land owner has
come up with this appeal.
5. Heard the learned senior counsel Sri.R
Rajasekharan Pillai appearing for the appellant
and the learned senior counsel Sri.S Sreekumar WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..4..
appearing for the first respondent.
6. According to the learned counsel for the
appellant, as provided under Rule 27 of the
Rules, the first respondent had an appellate
remedy and without invoking the appellate remedy,
he straight away approached this Court. It is
further submitted that factual appreciation is
required in this matter. Therefore, this Court
ought not have entertained this writ petition.
7. The learned senior counsel appearing for
the first respondent submits that no such
contention has been raised by the appellant
before the learned Single Judge in regard to the
alternative remedy and also submits that the
cancellation itself is illegal on the face of the
order inasmuch as that the power of cancellation
is only referable under Rule 20 of the Rules. It
is further submitted that power of cancellation
can be invoked by the Geologist only when he
satisfied that conditions in the dealer's licence WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..5..
have been violated.
8. Apparently, the Geologist canceled the
registration and dealer's licence noting that the
appellant was not willing to extend the validity
of the consent. If there exists a ground not to
grant any licence on same reason, the Geologist
can also invoke his power to cancel a licence.
It is true that as rightly pointed out by the
learned senior counsel for the first respondent,
Rule 20 of the Rules refers to cancellation only
when there are violation of conditions in the
dealer's licence. But it does not mean that for
any reason the original grant of licence is
vitiated, the Geologist has no power to cancel
it.
9. As pointed out by the learned senior
counsel for the appellant, this matter requires
appreciation of facts by adverting to the
documents and materials. In such circumstances,
we are of the view that the proper remedy of the WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..6..
first respondent is to approach the Appellate
Authority, Deputy Secretary to Government,
Industries Department. If that be so, the first
respondent shall move the Appellate Authority
within a period of ten days from today. The
Appellate Authority shall dispose of this matter
within a further period of one month thereon,
after hearing both sides.
10. Till the Appellate Authority takes a
decision in this matter, no coercive steps shall
be taken on the basis of Ext.P5 as against the
first respondent. The impugned judgment is,
accordingly, modified. The Appellate Authority
shall also communicate the order to the parties
without any delay.
This writ appeal is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JUDGE PR WA NO. 444 OF 2023
..7..
APPENDIX OF WA 444/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure-I TRUE COPY OF THE RENT DATED 20.3.2020 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE APEPLLANT AND ANEESH
Annexure-II TRUE COPY OF THE RENT DATED 20.3.2021 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE APEPLLANT AND ANEESH
Annexure-III TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29.1.2023 FROM THE ADDL.CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!