Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7325 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 2575 OF 2012
PETITIONER:
AJITH V.A.
VADAKKEDATHU VEEDU, MYNAGAPPALLY SOUTH,
MYNAGAPPALLY.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR CHERTHALA
RESPONDENTS:
1 SASTHAMCOTTA SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD
NO.2531,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, PORUVAZHY P.O,
PIN 690 520, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2 ASSISTANT ENGINEER [GENERAL] OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
SASTHAMCOTTA 690 521.
3 JOINT REGISTRAR [GENERAL] OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
KOLLAM 691 001.
4 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
BY ADVS.
SMT.BINDU GEORGE
SRI.K.SIJU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 27.06.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).1730/2013, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NOs.2575 OF 2012 & 1730 of 2013
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 1730 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
AJITH V.A.
VADAKKEDATHU VEEDU,MYNAGAPPALLY
SOUTH,MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRCT.
BY ADV SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENTS:
1 SASTHAMCOTTA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PORUVAZHY P.O.,KOLLAM
DISTRICT, PIN 690 520.
2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR [GENERAL] OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 520.
3 JOINT REGISTRAR [GENERAL] OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
KOLLAM - 691 001.
4 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5 RENJITH
S/O.GANGADHARAN PILLAI,THUMBOTHU VEEDU,
MUTHUVILKKAD P.O.,SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM DISTRICT
- 690 521.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.ABHILASH
SMT.BINDU GEORGE
SRI.K.SIJU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.06.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).2575/2012, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NOs.2575 OF 2012 & 1730 of 2013
3
JUDGMENT
These matters have been pending before this Court for
the last ten years without any orders. Obviously, these
matters may have become infructuous.
In fact, the learned counsel for the petitioners did not
have instructions either.
In the afore circumstances, these Writ Petitions are closed as
having become infructuous; however, leaving full liberty to the
petitioners to seek a rehearing, if any further orders are found
necessary.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE lsn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!